![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
How can anyone say Hitler was a Genius? Hitlers victories both Military and political were because of the fear, cowardice and incompetence of his adversaries not because of some grand insight on his part.
Sure he was clever, but He was also extraordinarily Lucky. He was lucky that Hindenburg, and von Papen underestimated him and that Chamberlin and the various French Presidents feared him. Hitler assumptions were almost always wrong, even when he benefited from them. For example he assumed that France and the UK would defend Czechosolakia while at the same time he thought they wouldnt bother going to war over Poland. He was wrong both times. He assumed Britain would sue for peace after the defeat of France, (wrong) that Russia would be finished in a few weeks (wrong), that Italy, Spain, Romania, Austra would be a useful allies (wrong), that America would stay out due to the isolationist movement (wrong) etc etc etc... |
![]() |
||
![]() |
Quote:
well reading the Political map is a great trait...and the man...who was brilliant...with a wicked Idiology knew how to read the political map and how and when to do certian things...u have to face it...it was fear...it was luck but a regular person such as me cold never succeed to control the entire world with out shooting a sinlge bullet. and then came Sept' 1939..... |
![]() |
|||
![]() |
Quote:
It would be nice to be able to attribute whatever "good" Germany managed to do between 1933 and 1939 to Hitler but I am more convinced that it was just pure luck that some of the sycophantic lackeys that formed the Nazi party also had some ability at the posts they were assigned. Quote:
|
![]() |
|
![]() |
MontyB
Actually I think BritinAfrica meant America (correct me if I'm wrong, Brit). I think Hitler did have a choice to invade Russia. War with Germany was the LAST thing Stalin wanted (he was too busy killing his own people, to have time to kill somebody else). A smart man knew the risks involved of invading the USSR, Hitlers Generals did, as did many of his staff like von Rittentrop who argued against it. In this case Hitler was relying on his ideological hatred, and like Napoleon his ego, so convinced he was that he couldnt not fail. At least Napoleon had some martial skill to back up his ego, Hitler was relying on his gamblers luck which had worked so well in the past. Hitler made the mistake in thinking luck would be with him indefinatly, but all luck runs out eventually. Hitler was a shrewd and ruthless politician, and like all bullies he was very good at manipulating weak people, but when he actually faced resistence his leadership abilities...lacked. |
![]() |
||
![]() |
Quote:
|
![]() |
||
![]() |
Quote:
The German people's admiration of Hitler was bought about by the fact that he turned the country's fortunes around once he became Chancellor attaining high employment and lifting the standard of living enormously. After the privations the German people had been suffering as a result of War reparations for WWI, followed by the depression, it's no wonder they were willing to overlook some of his less desirable traits. He would certainly have appeared to be a genius to them. One only has to be in the shoes of the German population who had suffered through the 1920s to see why they were willing to do anything for him. |
![]() |