Hilary takes New Hampshire

D

Del Boy

Active member
HILARY CLINTON won the New Hampshire contest as far as the Democrats were concerned. Speaking last night of the result forecast of a big Obama win, Bill Clinton said - B***-S***. He was right.

Now Obama has pledged not to use 9/11 in electioneering and to finish the job in Afghanistan; but is this a promise he can keep? I have grave doubts, it cannot be clever to hang your prospects on such a pledge, surely. That is a bigger problem than Iraq. Oops - bring back Geo W.!
 
If Klinton gets the seat in the office I am packing my guns and moving to Australia - I sh!t you not.

No way will she EVER be my Commander in Chief. Not now, not ever. Hell, could you see her at nuclear arms talks? "I don't know, Mr. Il, I've never made a decision before. What do YOU think? Oh, ignore the Joint Chiefs [giggles]. Boys and their toys, ya know."

Sorry, but that ***** is whacked in the head. I'd rather see a RINO like McCain in office than her. And Barrack has ZERO political experience, so he's about as useful as a REMF in a firefight.

This election = screwed no matter what.

Thus, I agree with the OP: Bring back George W.!

(Better yet, bring back Reagan).
 
Maytime said:
What it's going to come down to is a choice between a giant douche and a turd sandwich.
Click to expand...

Preeeeeeeeeecisely.

I wouldn't mind Ron Paul but he doesn't have a stone's chance on lake front property.

Hukabee looks good, too, but like Ron, he's overlooked for the more popularized nitwits of the bunch.

Does anyone know if Ireland allows personal gun ownership and REALLY has red heads that look like Maureen O'Hara? If so, I may change my new address from Australia to Ireland.
 
Please be mind full she won't act like a nut to take your guns away cause the Superme Court won't let her so plesae give the lady a darn chance.
 
warhappy100 said:
Please be mind full she won't act like a nut to take your guns away cause the Superme Court won't let her so plesae give the lady a darn chance.
Click to expand...

Like our congress did with the AWB of 1996?

No thanks, never again. Hillary is an anti-gun nut (it and opposing the war are her only two platforms). She is undecided on everything else, flip flops at every corner, and has no balls to do the job. Sorry, but them's the facts. If she gets in office, I'll be at risk for everything I hold dear so her socialist calendar can be put into play - my guns, my Christianity, my freedoms, and it will degrade my service to this nation.

I've busted my ass to get where I am at in life, which isn't very far. I'll be damned if her socialist ass will take it away or make me spread it around to a bunch of welfare mommas that crossed the border illegally.

The lady has some very redeeming qualities, don't get me wrong. But her inability to choose a position and stick with it makes me distrust her. Anti-gun, anti-God, anti-military (and don't you doubt that, lest I show you her voting referendums on military cuts) and open border means that she is a threat to this country.

Even her husband was better than her.

Please keep in mind that this is just MY opinion - I will discuss it, but not argue about it. My mind would only be swayed by a pretty hefty sum of facts I am not privy to, and that is unlikely given how close I am following this cluster FK of an election.

I'll give her a chance when she makes an actual platform that doesn't betray the foundations of the Republic this nation was founded on.
 
[rant]

My beef with presidential elections these days is that there is entirely too much money, hype, and false promises that go into campaigning that you really can't trust what a candidate says to be honest at any time. These people's strategy is to pander to the largest amount of voters who will give them their votes. Obama will have the black voters in the bank, Hillary will have women, now it's down to the smaller groups like gun owners, veterans, other minorities, religions, etc. I

'm so sick of the lies and the "I'll-scratch-your-back" mentality of elections and politics in general that my vote goes to the person who is the most unlike these turd sandwiches. Also, I don't know if anyone's noticed, but their speeches are such garbage and really don't say a damn thing except "We need change," or, "The new era is here..." GAH I want to throw up every time I hear that crap!

[/rant]
 
AZ_Infantry said:
Preeeeeeeeeecisely.

.

Does anyone know if Ireland allows personal gun ownership and REALLY has red heads that look like Maureen O'Hara? If so, I may change my new address from Australia to Ireland.
Click to expand...




Now you are talking. ALL the girls look like Maureen O'Hara. Nobody bothers with laws, when it comes down to there ain't no rules. Loads of horses, best jockeys and music in the world.
 
Del Boy said:
Now you are talking. ALL the girls look like Maureen O'Hara. Nobody bothers with laws, when it comes down to there ain't no rules. Loads of horses, best jockeys and music in the world.
Click to expand...

Errr, you're British, LOL!

But if that really IS the way Ireland is, I'm packing my bags tonight.

<--- Loves the red heads and detests the laws.

Edit: Kidding about the British thing (flag) and quite drunk. Wheeeeeeee! :)
 
AZ_Infantry said:
No way will she EVER be my Commander in Chief. Not now, not ever. Hell, could you see her at nuclear arms talks? "I don't know, Mr. Il, I've never made a decision before. What do YOU think? Oh, ignore the Joint Chiefs [giggles]. Boys and their toys, ya know."
Click to expand...



one day, i think the US may drag it's self out of the 1930's in regards to attitudes towards female leaders. look around, other countries have had effective, strong willed female leaders.


im not saying this necessarily about clinton (she's not my pick) but writing of a potential president just because she has internal genitals is a bit silly
 
Infern0 said:
one day, i think the US may drag it's self out of the 1930's in regards to attitudes towards female leaders. look around, other countries have had effective, strong willed female leaders.


im not saying this necessarily about clinton (she's not my pick) but writing of a potential president just because she has internal genitals is a bit silly
Click to expand...

You WAY mistook what I wrote, my friend.

Hillary being Hillary has nothing to do with her gender. In my eyes, she's just another John McCain with absolutely zero redeeming credentials as a leader and way too much tolerance to make the hard decisions.

I explained this quite well.

Whether she sits or stands to pee if of no consequence to me.

My men in the field, where and when we're deployed, and the amount of support our military gets ARE, however, key deciding factors. In all of that, plus my personal endearments (2A freedom, freedom to worship my God, not bowing to PC, etc) she fails miserably.

The fact SHE fails miserably is of no concern to my ticket, my gender, or my system of beliefs.

Please don't try and apply labels where none exist. I am neither sexist or chauvinistic. I simply want the best person in office representing our country. Hillary, Obama, John... None of these idiots fit the bill, and I could care less if they are men, women, transsexual, trans gender, satanists, Christians, young, old...

I just want this country back in shape. That takes a leader.

Sorry we are not seeing eye to eye on this, but where did you ever draw that I wouldn't vote for her just because she has a menstrual cycle? Be specific, please - I'd like to clear up the confusion so we can enter a real discussion. Show me where that attitude exists in my post, and I will apologize or defend as necessary.

Thanks!
 
AZ_Infantry said:
You WAY mistook what I wrote, my friend.

Hillary being Hillary has nothing to do with her gender.
Click to expand...



i'm going to re-quote for emphasis here;


"I don't know, Mr. Il, I've never made a decision before. What do YOU think? Oh, ignore the Joint Chiefs [giggles]. Boys and their toys, ya know."
Click to expand...


^^^
that sentence make no sense, if her gender isn't a problem for you
 
I don't think the US has that much against female leaders. I do think that theres a better choice than Clinton among female politico's. And thats simply because I do not trust her. Nothing she says rings true. Then again I'm jaded towards politicians in general and anyone named Clinton in particular.
 
03USMC said:
I don't think the US has that much against female leaders. I do think that theres a better choice than Clinton among female politico's. And thats simply because I do not trust her. Nothing she says rings true. Then again I'm jaded towards politicians in general and anyone named Clinton in particular.
Click to expand...



i wouldn't trust her either, but i see in a lot of comments about her, things that would never be said about male politico's
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Infern0 said:
i'm going to re-quote for emphasis here;





^^^
that sentence make no sense, if her gender isn't a problem for you
Click to expand...

Well, either we have a communication problem or you're just being obstinate - most likely, you're just too filled with hype from the media to look past anything.

The fact she can't make a decision has nothing to do with her being a woman.

It's the fact she CAN'T MAKE A DECISION.

Just because I used "boys and their toys" to add a bit of levity doesn't make me sexist. Levity - you know... ha ha?

Sorry you feel otherwise, but I gave MANY reasons she'll not get my vote. Picking out one funny comment and twisting it out of context to make me appear biased against women is just silly. :sarc:

Being a capable president isn't about gender. It's about making the hard decisions. Hillary cannot and will not make hard decisions, and her sitting in the House will doom this country. Just like McCain. We don't need people in the White House looking at the floor, shuffling their feet, going "Errrm, ummm, I dunno."

The idea YOU demand I give her a chance just because she IS a woman is where the only issue of gender bias comes in. The woman is and always has been a sh!tty politician who runs on one platform: She's a woman against the war. I can't help the fact she's a nitwit anymore than she can help the fact she's a woman. But her being an idiot isn't based on her gender, it's based on the fact that she chooses to be an idiot.

I don't want to argue about this. Take me for what you will, but you've got it all wrong (and won't accept correction).

Sorry we disagree.
 
Don't know where people get this idea that women like Hillary, I have yet to meet one who does.

And I agree with AZ, Hillary doesn't make decisions, she is however very good at dodging questions and shifting blame. For instance, when asked about a hypothetical situation involving the "ticking bomb" imminent terror attack, detaining persons illegally (but suspected of involvement), and the scenario was authored by one Bill Clinton, Hillary responds with "Well I'll have a talk with him tonight." without actually saying anything about how she would handle the situation. Every Hillary response is nothing but an elaborate "We'll cross that bridge when we get there." or some idealist b******t about Iraq and the Middle East.
 
Hmm lets see:
- Dodges questions.
- Shifts the blame.
- Full of catch phrases .

She sounds like 99.9% of the worlds politicians to me, these are people that make a living out of lies and self interest why is a bad trait in her and not the others?
 
AZ_Infantry said:
Well, either we have a communication problem or you're just being obstinate - most likely, you're just too filled with hype from the media to look past anything.

Picking out one funny comment and twisting it out of context to make me appear biased against women is just silly. :sarc:



Agreed. Yes, he is just a sniper.
Click to expand...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top