Ted said:
But IG, this is so very hypothetical. You instate a form of democracy and when you don't like the result you claim it isn't true democracy. I bet that if a very Israel oriented government would have emerged you would claim that true democracy had done it's job!
And saying that they don't have true democracy is so condescending! Just because you don't like the result can only mean one thing: they don't know what they are doing!
You're wrong. Answer this: Do Palestinians have a free society where if you criticize their political leader you are protected by a detailed set of laws laid out by Congressmen? No, unless they live within Israel.
Do Palestinians have a fair and due process of law when they get trialed? No, unless they live within Israel.
Can a Palestinian write what he thinks on a publicly published newspaper, saying anything (e.g. the Palestinian Authority sucks because they're just terrorists and this and that) and nobody will cause him trouble? No, unless he lives within Israel.
Can a Palestinian go to school wearing a kippah, as a sign of friendship with Israel? No, they can't, although many Jewish kids wear kefiahs in Israel.
Can a Palestinian teacher teach his kids that the Jews are good guys and the Nazis and the terrorists who kill civilians on buses are rotten bastards? No he could never do that.
Do you really think a Palestinian could sue a minister from any Fatah government or publicly denounce the leaders' corruption and expect to enjoy real justice? No, never. Remember Fatah has always systematically jailed or eliminate Palestinian journalists who were not aligned with Arafat and did not cherish him.
Are minorities respected in the Palestinian society? No, because they do not have any minority. They would not respect a Jewish minority while Israel is home to more than one million Arabs with Israeli passport. And please note that respect for minorities is a true aspect of any democracy.
I'm not saying elections were rigged, I'm just saying elections do not mean democratic society altogether, in spite of their major importance. And this is precisely the case of Palestine. Palestine is not even a State, how can they be democratic? They don't even have control over their own police or territory.
This is why the fact that Hamas won elections does not change my view on democracy in any way. My faith in the terrific effects of democracy is unrivaled an stronger than ever.
Anyways I'm -paradoxically- moderately optimistic about what will come next.
Have you read what
The Telegraph says?
"Arab leaders - and not a few Europeans - will be muttering to the Americans: "We told you so. Allowing the ordinary Muslims to vote freely is a bad idea."
Yet this would be the wrong lesson to draw. The popularity of political Islam reflects the bankruptcy of the political order that has gone before. When the state fails, as it has done across the Middle East since the end of the colonial era, then Muslims instinctively turn to the mosque.
So the first lesson has to be a gradual reform of autocratic Arab states, risky as that may seem.
With Arafat, or even his successor, Mahmoud Abbas, there has always been a debate over whether the Palestinian Authority was unable, or merely unwilling, to stop the violence. Palestinian leaders have turned weakness into a diplomatic art-form, telling Israel and the West they needed more concessions in order to have the authority to take on Hamas. With the terrorists in office, there should be no such ambiguity. When the suicide bombs go off, the address for protests will be obvious: the office of the Palestinian prime minister".
And then you sarcastically ask Gladius: "What if your democracy experiment gives rise to something like that too?", showing that you do not have any "democracy experiment" up your sleeve, and you couldn't care less about that weird concept. Are you somewhat adverse to democracy yourself?
Last. You said: "Just because you don't like the result can only mean one thing: they don't know what they are doing!"... I never said they don't know, they do very well.