What if, completely hypothetically, the gulf war played out entirely the same, but the iraqis were equipped with the m1 abrams and the coalition with the t72. would the iraqis have done better? would the m1 save them?
in essence would the superior tank have won the battle or would the coalition's tactics and strategy, although armed with the inferior tank, still beat the iraqis using the m1?
again this is completely hypothetical...but basically which is more important, the tank itself or the strategy and battle tactics?
in essence would the superior tank have won the battle or would the coalition's tactics and strategy, although armed with the inferior tank, still beat the iraqis using the m1?
again this is completely hypothetical...but basically which is more important, the tank itself or the strategy and battle tactics?