[FONT="]But the question was answered in the next year:[/FONT]
Page 4, last paragraph… ”12. On 21 May 2005, the Agency received from another Member State a number of centrifuge components, environmental sampling of which was thought might provide information on the origin of the LEU and HEU particle contamination found at various locations in Iran. The analysis of swipe samples taken from those components, which was carried out at the Agency’s Safeguards Analytical Laboratory (SAL), was completed in early August 2005. Based on the information currently available to the Agency, the results of that analysis tend, on balance, to support Iran’s statement about the foreign origin of most of the observed HEU contamination.”
http://www.isisnucleariran.org/assets/pdf/iaea-iranreport-090205.pdf
HEU: high enriched uranium
LEU: low enriched uranium
SAL: Safeguards Analytical Laboratory, Seibersdorf, Austria
So be more careful about your sources in future.
My source was the IAEA itself. The same document also says :
45. With respect to the first issue — contamination — as indicated above, based on the information currently available to the Agency, the results of the environmental sample analysis tend, on balance, to support Iran’s statement about the foreign origin of most of the observed HEU contamination.
It is still not possible at this time, however, to establish a definitive conclusion with respect to all of the contamination, particularly the LEU contamination. This underscores the importance of additional work on the scope and chronology of Iran’s P-1 and P-2 centrifuge programmes, which could greatly contribute to the resolution of the remaining contamination issues.
About the contamination issue at the university the IAEA said : Therefore, the
Agency considers those
questions no longer outstanding at this stage
Implementation of the NPT Safeguards - 22 February 2008
[FONT="]20% enriched uranium is used for medical purposes. When it was finished in Iran, Iran requested from IAEA to prepare it for her and as per IAEA rules, IAEA must have done it. But as I said before, IAEA is in west countries control and as their order IAEA said to Iran we give you the 20% enriched uranium if you give us your 3.5% enriched uranium. Since this request was illegal, Iran started producing 20% enriched uranium herself. And as Ahmadinejad said two month before we can stop producing 20% enriched uranium if they sell it us without any condition.[/FONT]
Well the problem is the UN resolutions. No one is allowed to sell that fuel to Iran. The resolutions are binding, and the ones who are able to sell that to Iran abide by those resolutions. To solve this matter the fastest way is for Iran to abide by the UN resolutions. Stop the enrichment.
[FONT="]If they are care about the world wide consequences, it is better to destroy their nuclear weapons instead of depriving other countries from their legal rights. NUCLEAR ENERGY FOR EVERYONE, NUCLEAR WEAPON FOR NO ONE.[/FONT]
I agree with you, but only if the IAEA has broader powers so military sites researching nuclear related stuff can be destroyed.
[FONT="]If Israel dared to carry out it, he would have done it before ten times, as she did in Iraq and Syria.
[/FONT]
Do not underestimate the daring of Israel.
[FONT="]Yes, that is allowed. But it is silly to be care for a murder or a thief who doesn’t observe the city rules while he is objecting to a citizen who observes the city rules but is objecting about the city management.[/FONT]
It's a little different. Israel didn't signed the protocol so it does not have to follow it (my point of view is they must sign that protocol), Iran did, but it is not following it like it should be.
[FONT="]Enrichment activities are legal, making nuclear weapons is illegal which Iran is doing the first one, but the Israel did the second one.[/FONT]
Let me say it this way. In the middle east no one trust each other. Maybe they should work on that one first. The west and Israel doesn't trust Iran, as are some Arab countries. And other countries don't trust Israel. I hope it turns out as during the cold war when the west and the USSR didn't trust each other. We both were defending ourselves for something the other side was not going to do.
[FONT="]Iran has never said that she want to wipe out Israel from the world. This is a big lie. Iran always says the Palestinians are the real original owner of occupied Palestine and they must come back to their homeland and they should decide about the Jews who immigrated.[/FONT]
Wipe Israel 'off the map' Iranian says. That's the article that started it all. A Washington Post article says this : "Cole said this week that in the 1980s Khomeini gave a speech in which he said in Persian “Een rezhim-i eshghalgar-i Quds bayad az sahneh-i ruzgar mahv shaved.” This means, “This occupation regime over Jerusalem must vanish from the arena of time.” But then anonymous wire service translators rendered Khomeini as saying that Israel “must be wiped off the face of the map,” which Cole and Nourouzi say is inaccurate."
I tried to translate the Persian sentence with Google Translate but nothing came out of it. Maybe you can help.
[FONT="]As a European should be more care about the Europe than an Asian, I should be more care about ME than a European.[/FONT]
We are living in a worldwide economy. Borders diminish. It is better to open up than to isolate yourself.
