I stand my point and women should be ablr to join up and fight for their country even though they don't have the male organ.
In the US women DO join up and fight for their country. It doesn't matter that they do not have the "male organ."
It isn't always about strength and etc.
I've been in combat arms my entire military career .. it is VERY much about strength. Mental determination will only get you so far without the body mass/muscle mass to carry the load. That is reality. A lot of good men with the hearts of lions cannot make it in this field simply because they do not have the strength. Until women evolve, change their skeletal structures and develop a more mass producing hormone (besides testosterone) they WILL be the
physically weaker sex.
Maybe the will of defending the country isn't as valuable anymore.
As I said, women already serve proudly .. putting them into combat arms MOS will not add nor take away from their honorable service through the years and wars.
But I know that the will can beat the strength issue at all times.
"Will" is important, and sometimes it is that mental determination that will make or break you .. push you to the edge and back again. That said; "Will" will not carry my 200lbs + Irish arse out of the enemy AO and to safety and it will not prevent stress fractures to the smaller bones women have from carrying a 140lbs + ruck.
It doesn't matter where you serve, as long as you serve. Combat arms may seem glamorous, but it isn't. Support MOSes aren't that glamorous either. While they may have different missions, one thing does remain the same - both are serving THEIR country. I'm not sure why you feel women aren't serving if they aren't in combat arms .. you're taking away from them and their sacrifice.
Btw, plenty of female MPs are getting some in Iraq.