FOURTEEN CHARACTERISTICS OF FASCISM

chewie_nz

Banned
FOURTEEN CHARACTERISTICS OF FASCISM
http://chetzar.com/fascism.html/

Dr. Lawrence Britt, a political scientist, wrote an article about fascism which appeared in Free Inquiry magazine, a journal of humanist thought. Dr. Britt studied the fascist regimes of Hitler (Germany), Mussolini (Italy), Franco (Spain), Suharto (Indonesia), and Pinochet (Chile). He found the regimes all had 14 things in common, and he calls these the identifying characteristics of fascism. The article is titled "Fascism Anyone?," and appears in Free Inquiry’s Spring 2003 issue on page 20.

The 14 characteristics are:

1.. Powerful and Continuing Nationalism – Fascist regimes tend to make constant use of patriotic mottos, slogans, symbols, songs, and other paraphernalia. Flags are seen everywhere, as are flag symbols on clothing and in public displays.

2.. Disdain for the Recognition of Human Rights – Because of fear of enemies and the need for security, the people in fascist regimes are persuaded that human rights can be ignored in certain cases because of "need." The people tend to ‘look the other way’ of even approve of torture, summary executions, assassinations, long incarcerations of prisoners, etc.

3.. Identification of Enemies/Scapegoats as a Unifying Cause – The people are rallied into a unifying patriotic frenzy over the need to eliminate a perceived common threat or foe; racial, ethnic or religious minorities; liberals; communists; socialists; terrorists, etc.

4.. Supremacy of the Military – Even when there are widespread domestic problems, the military is given a disproportionate amount of government funding, and the domestic agenda is neglected. Soldiers and military service are glamorized.

5.. Rampant Sexism – The government if fascist nations tend to be almost exclusively male-dominated. Under fascist regimes, traditional gender roles are made more rigid. Opposition to abortion is high, as is homophobia and anti-gay legislation and national policy.

6.. Controlled Mass Media – Sometimes the media is directly controlled by the government, but in other cases, the media is indirectly controlled by government regulation, or through sympathetic media spokespeople and executives. Censorship, especially in wartime, is very common.

7.. Obsession with National Security – Fear is used as a motivation tool by the government over the masses.

8.. Religion and Government are Intertwined – Governments in fascist nations tend to use the most common religion in the nation as a tool to manipulate public opinion. Religious rhetoric and terminology is common from government leaders, even when the major tenets of the religion are diametrically opposed to the government’s policies or actions.

9.. Corporate Power is Protected – The industrial and business aristocracy of a fascist nation often are the ones who put the government leaders in power, creating a mutually beneficial business/government relationship and power elite.

10.. Labor Power is Suppressed – Because the organizing power of labor is the only real threat to a fascist government, labor unions are either eliminated entirely or are severely suppressed.

11.. Disdain for Intellectuals and the Arts – Fascist nations tend to promote and tolerate open hostility to higher education, and academia. It is not uncommon for professors and other academics to be censored or even arrested. Free expression in the arts is openly attacked, and governments often refuse to fund the arts.

12.. Obsession with Crime and Punishment – Under fascist regimes, the police are given almost limitless power to enforce laws. The people are often willing to overlook police abuses, and even forego civil liberties, in the name of patriotism. There is often a national police force with virtually unlimited power in fascist nations.

13.. Rampant Cronyism and Corruption – Fascist regimes almost always are governed by groups of friends and associates who appoint each other to government positions, and who use governmental power and authority to protect their friends from accountability.

14.. Fraudulent Elections – Sometimes elections in fascist nations are a complete sham. Other times elections are manipulated by smear campaigns against (or even the assassination of) the opposition candidates, the use of legislation to control voting numbers or political district boundaries, and the manipulation of the media. Fascist nations also typically use their judiciaries to manipulate or control elections
 
I think i may be a Fascist.

I agree with

#1
#2
#3
#4
#6
#7
#8
#12

Yeh, definitely a Fascist.
 
Comunism will also fit very well in many of this characterictics, with the only exception of #8. I think this are the characteristic of all kind of dictator ship, not just Fascism.
 
Rabs said:
I think i may be a Fascist.

I agree with

#1
#2
#3
#4
#6
#7
#8
#12

Yeh, definitely a Fascist.

how bout you actually THINK about what you are saying. 60 years ago the world united to crush fascism, don't be so ready to identify with it.
 
how bout you actually THINK about what you are saying. 60 years ago the world united to crush fascism, don't be so ready to identify with it.

I'm with him on that.


However I would like to say that the list is very general and dosent fit all countrys. Also some aspects of "facisem" shown here are not uncommon in democracys and are not that bad in moderation.

In my eyes the key is that facists take everything to am extreme, and the state cases to serve the people and serves only the government.
 
I would define Fascism as the social and political ideology with the primary guiding principle that the state or nation is the highest priority, rather than personal or individual freedoms.
 
i think what chocobo is trying to say (without actually having the stones to come out with it) is that my post is aimed at the US.

it isn't


here in NZ i fight facsist and neo nazi groups. this piece was posted in our forums and i thought it would be of interest.

if you can see these charecteristics in your own country, i'd worry. then i'd do something about it.
 
We had the first original fascismo in the world. I don't agree with the point of art (disdain for): italian fascism promoted a lot of art and a lot of academia people were part of the establishment.
On top of that, they had no "obsession for punishment" back then.
 
Sherman summed it up pretty well why the article is fubar, but I felt like it was catered specifically for people to draw parrallels to the US.

It seemed pretty obvious to me, but I guess not...
 
Chocobo_Blitzer said:
Sherman summed it up pretty well why the article is fubar

where?

Chocobo_Blitzer said:
but I felt like it was catered specifically for people to draw parrallels to the US.

It seemed pretty obvious to me, but I guess not...



thats your perogative to believe what you want, it mentions the regiemes that the study looked at before drawing these commonalities. if you feel that some (or many) are represented in the US at this time, it just goes to show that it wouldn't take much of a slide to go from "a freedom exporting democracy" to "a despotic facist state". and maybe illustrates the fear that some of us have about where the US could go.
 
if you feel that some (or many) are represented in the US at this time, it just goes to show that it wouldn't take much of a slide to go from "a freedom exporting democracy" to "a despotic facist state". and maybe illustrates the fear that some of us have about where the US could go

But dont you agree that if democarcy was more agressive about self protection during the 20th century alot of bad stuff could be avoided. You do understand that when democracy stops defending itself it becomes anarchy?
 
SHERMAN said:
if you feel that some (or many) are represented in the US at this time, it just goes to show that it wouldn't take much of a slide to go from "a freedom exporting democracy" to "a despotic facist state". and maybe illustrates the fear that some of us have about where the US could go

But dont you agree that if democracy was more agressive about self protection during the 20th century alot of bad stuff could be avoided. You do understand that when democracy stops defending itself it becomes anarchy?


i part i do, but then we get to the very thinest of lines; "where does self protection stop"

pre emptive attacks or projecting military power outside of your own borders. remember that this was the justification that hitler used to stomp his way across europe....poland "attacked" germany. self defence then right?

and just as an aside, anarchy isn't neccisarily a bad thing... the basic premise for anarchy is just that we should all be responsible for our own actions;

The word "anarchy", as most anarchists use it, does not imply chaos or anomie, but rather a stateless society with voluntary social harmony. All proponents of anarchism argue that relations based upon voluntary cooperation (as opposed to statism) will lead to a society of free individuals.

Anarchism is a term which encompasses a variety of political philosophies, social movements, and political ideologies that advocate the abolition of all forms of coercion (including any social hierarchy of a dominating nature). Proponents of anarchism argue that relations based upon voluntary cooperation and mutual aid will lead to a society characterized by the ability of each actor to have a say in outcomes proportionate to the degree they are affected by them, a society consisting of free individuals.

Individual freedom and opposition to the State are the unvarying principles of anarchism; less agreed upon are such matters as the role of violence in changing society, the preferred type of economic system, whether private property is allowable, whether hierarchy and unequal social status are natural voluntary social forms or authoritarian, the interpretation of egalitarian ideals, and the degree of organization desirable to effect social change
.
 
Anarchy in its ideal form can never exist. It would become a situaton that thhe strong rob and kill the weak.
 
Italian Guy said:
Thank you mate. Didnt know that. Well I guess point number 2 is now valid, only :oops: :D

Indeed it is, as Sherman points out Anachy in its purest form cannot work.
 
SHERMAN said:
Anarchy in its ideal form can never exist. It would become a situaton that thhe strong rob and kill the weak.

i 100% agree with you, it is a nice idea though....and and only our own nature that screws it up.

my point was that anarchy isn't neccisarily a bad thing...chaos would be my choice of words.
 
Back
Top