Family Christens USS George H.W. Bush

Team Infidel

Forum Spin Doctor
http://apnews.myway.com/article/20061008/D8KK44R80.html

By JENNIFER LOVEN
[FONT=Verdana,Sans-serif](AP) President Bush, center, with former President George H.W. Bush, left, and Florida Gov. Jeb Bush,...[/FONT]


NEWPORT NEWS, Va. (AP) - Spraying the bubbles from sparkling wine across the enormous gray bow of the USS George H.W. Bush, the Bush family on Saturday christened the nuclear-powered aircraft carrier named after the 82-year-old former president.
"I know you join me in saying to our father, President Bush, your ship has come in," the current president said during a ceremony for the last of the Nimitz-class carriers, the CVN 77.
"She is unrelenting, she is unshakable, she is unyielding, she is unstoppable," Bush said, lauding the warship's state-of-the-art design before pausing for a punch line aimed at his mother's well-known steely constitution. "As a matter of fact, probably should have been named the Barbara Bush." The elder Bush, a decorated Navy pilot in World War II, joined the armed forces on his 18th birthday, June 12, 1942. "After our nation was attacked at Pearl Harbor, you simply couldn't find anyone who wasn't anxious to sign up," he told the audience as a heavy rain fell.

The point is that our nation was totally united against the insidious totalitarian threat against freedom," he said. He added, "In my humble view, we were no greater than the kids that serve today."

The current president said that in the 21st century, "freedom is again under attack and young Americans are volunteering to answer the call."
Doro Bush Koch, the elder Bush's daughter, handled the ritual smashing of a bottle of sparkling wine against the flattop's bow.
Bush father and son and several relatives joined hundreds of others, from government dignitaries to shipyard workers, at Northrop Grumman Newport News, where the $6 billion, 1,092-foot-long carrier is being built. It is not yet finished and is scheduled to be delivered to the Navy in late 2008. The christening ceremony was scheduled to be nearly two hours long, but deafening thunderclaps, lightning, wind and intermittent heavy rain left the speakers mostly abandoning their prepared remarks to merely introduce the next in line.

The elder Bush choked up during his informal and sentimental address, while talking about the men with whom he served in World War II.

Four Navy veterans who served with Bush during the war traveled to the ceremony, an event the former president called the "third happiest day of his life," after his wedding and the day when two of his sons were elected governors.
"This is every naval aviator's dream," he said
The 10th of the Nimitz-class carriers - the largest warships in the world - features technological advancements that make it a bridge to the next generation of nuclear-powered aircraft carriers. On Sunday, the carrier was to be launched from its dry-dock into the James River and taken to an outfitting berth, where work on interior systems will continue.

The former president was the youngest pilot in the Navy when he joined, receiving his commission and naval aviator wings before age 19.

Bush flew torpedo bombers off the aircraft carrier USS San Jacinto. In 1944, he was on a mission over the Pacific when Japanese anti-aircraft fire hit his plane. Bush parachuted into the sea and was rescued by a Navy submarine. He later was awarded the Distinguished Flying Cross and three Air Medals for his Navy service in the Pacific theater. Capt. Kevin O'Flaherty, the carrier's prospective commanding officer, is in charge of about 330 sailors now attached to the ship. He said he eventually will be responsible for about 3,000 crew members when the ship is put into service. It is not known where the carrier is to be stationed.
 
Nice ship, good sailors, but why not mention the the current President did not have the guts to do active service himself. This man brings others into danger, but dives for cover at every alarm. The USA deserves something better!!!
 
Because this article wasn't about the current President. Besides, there's been plenty of dirt thrown at the current President in other articles.
 
Nice ship, good sailors, but why not mention the the current President did not have the guts to do active service himself. This man brings others into danger, but dives for cover at every alarm. The USA deserves something better!!!

You aren't entitled to that opinion. Come to America, go through the naturalization process, become a citizen, and then you can say whatever you want about Bush or any other President. But until you have done so, shut your big mouth.
 
Not to play Mod, but I believe the rules of this forum urge toleratation and respect of all opinions. You people dont hesitate to criticize the leaders of other countries, so whats wrong with a foreigner criticizing the President of the USA? You dont have to agree, but don't be hypocritical.

Back to Subject...

I am alittle disturbed about naming ships after living presidents. It seems like the politicans trying to polish their own apples. We should stick to the old system of naming ships after those that have passed away in order to wash the stink off politics off. Thats my only beef, I have no problem naming a carrier after Bush or submarine after Carter.
 
Last edited:
excellent point by mmarsh. However, Englander2, such remarks will not earn you a lot of friends here. I personally have no comment on this matter, except that it's good to know that the most powerful Navy in the world has one more ship in its large arsenal.
 
Not to play Mod, but I believe the rules of this forum urge toleratation and respect of all opinions. You people dont hesitate to criticize the leaders of other countries, so whats wrong with a foreigner criticizing the President of the USA? You dont have to agree, but don't be hypocritical.

Couldnt agree more but then this has been an issue for a long time so I doubt anything will change.

Back to Subject...

I am alittle disturbed about naming ships after living presidents. It seems like the politicans trying to polish their own apples. We should stick to the old system of naming ships after those that have passed away in order to wash the stink off politics off. Thats my only beef, I have no problem naming a carrier after Bush or submarine after Carter.


I really dont see any problems with the name and I think it is probably a tribute he deserves (dead or alive) however if there is some convention about only naming ships after dead presidents then maybe they should have waited but personally I cant see the point.
 
Mmarsh, you are talking about the rules of the forum. I'm talking about the rules of this country. I would think you and any other American would be with me on this one.
 
Mmarsh
, you are talking about the rules of the forum. I'm talking about the rules of this country. I would think you and any other American would be with me on this one.

But as he has pointed out there is no shortage of criticism by americans on this board of other world leaders/nations if you expect other nations citizens not to criticise GWB then perhaps you should extend the same courtesy?
 
Last edited:
But as he has pointed out there is no shortage of criticism by americans on this board of other world leaders/nations if you expect other nations citizens not to criticise GWB then perhaps you should extend the same courtesy?

When have I ever questioned Jacques Chirac's IQ or Vladimir Putin's courage? It is one thing to criticize another leader's foreign policy but it is just uncalled for someone to question what kind of a man they are.http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jacques_Chirac
 
Back
Top