Ex-Envoy Urges European Troops To Work Together

Team Infidel

Forum Spin Doctor
Washington Times
January 25, 2008
Pg. 13
Tells U.S. to engage insurgents
By Leander Schaerlaeckens, Washington Times
BRUSSELS — In order to have any chance of winning the war in Afghanistan, NATO's European member states will have to remove caveats on how and where their troops can fight and work together more closely, according to a former British diplomat who oversaw reconstruction in Iraq and Afghanistan.
In return, the United States should radically alter its strategy and engage insurgents instead of fighting them, says Daniel Korski, a fellow at the European Council on Foreign Relations, in a new report.
"European governments should agree to lift operational restrictions on existing deployments and move troops to the now quieter east, allowing the U.S. to transfer forces to the south in aid of the British, Canadians and Dutch," said Mr. Korski, who also advised the Afghan government on the fight against narcotics.
The report also argued that the European delegations haven't consolidated their strategies and are undermining one another with irreconcilable policies.
The caveats, which range from preventing troops from fighting at night to staying within a certain area under all circumstances, have recently come under fire because they allow countries to take part in, and get credit for, operations while leaving the burden of risk to others.
The British, Canadians and Dutch, who have taken the brunt of the heavy fighting in southern Afghanistan, have urged other countries in the alliance to drop the caveats and assist them but to no avail.
Gen. Klaus Naumann of Germany, who is chairman of NATO's military committee, told the Guardian newspaper that the caveats were undermining NATO and threatening his country's reputation as a reliable military partner.
Mr. Korski's report stressed that some of the alliance's European members are doing a minimalist job and are failing to coordinate adequately, which has severely hampered progress.
"EU countries have treated the common effort in Afghanistan like a potluck dinner where every guest is free to bring his own dish," Mr. Korski said.
It is becoming plain to see that counties such as Austria, Ireland, Luxembourg and Switzerland — with symbolic troop contributions of three, seven, nine and two respectively — are the ones bringing the napkins, cups and ice to the potluck, according to the report.
"The U.S. rightly argues that more troops are needed to dominate the terrain, and lambasts European allies for their failure to step up their effort," the report says, echoing a statement made by Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates last week when he told the Los Angeles Times that the performance of fellow NATO countries involved in Afghanistan was for the most part inadequate.
Instead of a strictly militaristic mission which actively fights the Taliban, the forces should take a more passive stance and serve chiefly to protect the Afghans and help improve their standard of living.
The report was released with an eye on the upcoming NATO summit in Bucharest, Romania, in April, at which the International Security Assistance Force Afghanistan's progress and strategy will be discussed.
 
Difference of opinion openly expressed without fear of oppression is a freedom which we have grown to accept as being normal within democracy. In the last few years however, several states claiming to be democratic have introduced laws which contravene this very freedom.
Few would wish to argue that the last century was without crimes against humanity, but why have the Western Allies, for example never allowed an investigation into their own war crimes? All we hear in the Media, is how terrible the Germans were. It seems to be forgotten, (also in German schools), that Hitler was not German born, but a migrant who had been accepted by that country after applying for citizenship..
We now have the absurd situation, in which the NATO is calling for Germany to send fighting troops into Afghanistan, a land which has never threatened in any way the people of Europe. At the same time, the Wehrmacht (63 years after WW2) is still being criticised for having marched into Poland. That country was a real threat to Germany between the 2 world wars, having been the first state to build concentration camps for ethnic minorities within Europe. Hundreds of German speaking people had been imprisoned or killed before the decision to invade was taken.
Anybody (in many European countries) these days, who openly tries to obtain an impartial fair view of what happened in 1938/9, risks a long prison sentence. The truth is not wanted, because it does not fit into current international conceptions. At the same time, demands are being made for the new smaller Germany to fight against complete strangers, in a war which was never justified. As a Briton, who just happens to live in a German garrison town, I am forced to ask myself, will these young lads, who do service at the risk of their lives, one day also be portrayed as Criminals. A soldier seldom hears the words "thank you" is that too much to ask?
 
Back
Top