For the last few decades of peacekeeping missions it was always the "regular" military that went abroad. Finally, after much lobby work, the Dutch government was prepared to sent our commando's into the field. But being Dutch, this means in accordance with strict safety rules. (We learned some lessons from Srebrenica...)
One of the demands was that we worked with the Americans, but not under the command of the Americans. Secondly, if the Dutch came under fire, US gunships would offer immediate support etc. etc. This seemed okay to me.
But to my amazement a member of parliament stated the our forces shouldn't go because "it could be dangerous". To be continued....
But what I am looking for via this thread is: did any of you work with the Dutch in Afghanistan? What are the odds that our troops in Uruzghan will be in charge of that region or the the US claims control since their involvement and overview is much greater?
One of the demands was that we worked with the Americans, but not under the command of the Americans. Secondly, if the Dutch came under fire, US gunships would offer immediate support etc. etc. This seemed okay to me.
But to my amazement a member of parliament stated the our forces shouldn't go because "it could be dangerous". To be continued....
But what I am looking for via this thread is: did any of you work with the Dutch in Afghanistan? What are the odds that our troops in Uruzghan will be in charge of that region or the the US claims control since their involvement and overview is much greater?