Originally Posted by Rob Henderson

It's so funny that you (Spike) say that you don't give "idiots" the time of day, yet you NEVER FAIL to reply to a post.

Ahhhh,... back to our childish pranks Rob, I thought you may have learned after after being sat on your @rse last time, with your admitted outright lies and attempted at evasions of the truth.

I could very easily answer that question, but not fully believing you have quoted me within my meaning I would ask.

"Could you please quote exactly where i said that"?

You must realise that having been caught out as a malicious liar (twice,... yes,... I still remember), I will be closely watching everything you say and do, your credibility and moral reasoning is severely lacking. All from a self professed christian too,... Sighhhh,.. I sometimes wonder what the world has come to.

Originally Posted by senojekips

I am not in the habit of entertaining idiots who can't grasp facts.

Sorry, Spike, I realize you might be suffering some memory loss.



It's also so funny how you take this forum so seriously... It's mental masturbation... Give me a break with the "better than thou" (I realize holier than thou would be MUCH more appropriate) crap. I couldn't give two shakes of a stick at what you think of me.

Originally Posted by Rob Henderson

Sorry, Spike, I realize you might be suffering some memory loss.

It's also so funny how you take this forum so seriously... It's mental masturbation... Give me a break with the "better than thou" (I realize holier than thou would be MUCH more appropriate) crap. I couldn't give two shakes of a stick at what you think of me.

I find it even more funny the way that you deliberately misconstrue the comments of others, then when confronted you havent the intestinal fortitude to take your licks, so you slither back into your hole, with some ill thought smart @rsed comment (that usually back fires like this last one).

In fact most of that post was not for your benefit but merely to remind people here of who we are dealing with. Someone willing to lie and distort what others say merely to win a point,.... who then says stupid things like "It's also so funny how you take this forum so seriously..."

Well obviously I don't take the forum so seriously as to have to misrepresent what others have said to win a point. You see,... nothing you say here has any credulity, pathological liars, like drug addicts are not worth wasting time trying to correct, the next best thing being to just keep letting them know that you are aware of their "frailty"

Grow up

Now that is what I call funny,....

(Notice how he COMPLETELY ignored the fact that I called his error... He DID call our new man an idiot and he DID say he wasn't in the habit of entertaining idiots.)


You're a bloody riot, old man.

Originally Posted by Rob Henderson

(Notice how he COMPLETELY ignored the fact that I called his error... He DID call our new man an idiot and he DID say he wasn't in the habit of entertaining idiots.)


You're a bloody riot, old man.

But you didn't quote where i said I don't entertain idiots, .. Which i was not on this occasion, I was telling him a few home truths, something he needed and definitely not entertainment,... FAIL.

Didn't you read where I said,

Originally Posted by senojekips

I could very easily answer that question, but not fully believing you have quoted me within my meaning I would ask.

"Could you please quote exactly where i said that"?

You lie , you deliberately misquote and every time you fall on your @rse it must be the size of a house to withstand all that punishment.

A riot indeed. But I'm not a pathological liar who still professes to be a "christian"

Fine christian morals you display there Rob,... you are a fine example of your kind, pity it's all a lie and you fool no one but yourself, which I guess in view of the evidence is very easily done.... in fact it's a "no contest".

Originally Posted by senojekips

But you didn't quote where i said I don't entertain idiots, .. Which i was not on this occasion, I was telling him a few home truths, something he needed and definitely not entertainment,... FAIL.

If, by entertaining, you mean giving him some sort of pleasure, YOU were the one who failed... If, by entertaining, you mean giving him consideration, then you ENTERTAINED him with any reply beyond "I am not in the habit of entertaining idiots who cannot grasp facts."

See, you gave him and his idea consideration, which is the third definition of "entertain"... So you DID "entertain" him. By the way, check post number 512, where I DIRECTLY QUOTE your statement about you not entertaining idiots.

Originally Posted by senojekips

Didn't you read where I said, You lie , you mdeliberately misquote and every time you fall on your @rse.

A riot indeed. But I'm not a pathological liar (Look it up) who still professes to be a "christian"

Fine christian morals you display there Rob,... pity it's all a lie and you fool no one but yourself, which I guess in view of the evidence is very easily done.... in fact it's a "no contest".

Settle down, man... From your typing, I'd say I've gotten you a bit riled up... Wouldn't want anything to happen to you.

Aside from all this, attacking my religious beliefs does absolutely NOTHING for me... There's a reason it's called "faith." "Complete trust or confidence in someone or something."

Remember? I couldn't give two shakes of a stick at what you think about me OR my morals.

Originally Posted by Rob Henderson

If, by entertaining, you mean giving him some sort of pleasure, YOU were the one who failed... If, by entertaining, you mean giving him consideration, then you ENTERTAINED him with any reply beyond "I am not in the habit of entertaining idiots who cannot grasp facts."

Rob, you can interpret your own posts as you wish, ... but please do not try to tell me what I mean when I post. If that's his (it's) version of entertainment, I'll entertain him until they close the thread and with great relish. The entertainment being solely on my behalf.

By the way, check post number 512, where I DIRECTLY QUOTE your statement about you not entertaining idiots.

You did and i apologise for having missed it, but never the less, it still falls within the answer I gave previously, and have repeated once since, where I deliberately stated, (knowing full well your fondness for jumping in feet first)

Originally Posted by senojekips

I could very easily answer that question, but not fully believing you have quoted me within my meaning I would ask---snip---.

Me stating this, was not an accident, You are altogether too predictable. All one has to do is wait for you to fall into your own big mouth, it doesn't take long, and it's a target you could never miss.

Remember? I couldn't give two shakes of a stick at what you think about me OR my morals.

Ahhh,.. but you do, as you keep telling me you don't care, if your statement were true you would ignore it. You are absolutely transparent,as i see it. not a really desirable quality for someone who continually tells lies. But at least I guess you lie consistently if not artfully.

Originally Posted by senojekips

Rob, you can interpret your own posts as you wish, ... but please do not try to tell me what I mean when I post. If that's his (it's) version of entertainment, I'll entertain him until they close the thread and with great relish. The entertainment being solely on my behalf.

Sorry... I don't come up with the definition of words and neither does he. A word cannot have a definition outside it's written one.

I did not say what you mean, I said "IF you meant"... So, I'll let you answer.. What did you mean when you said "I do not entertain idiots..."?

Originally Posted by senojekips

You did and i apologise for having missed it, but never the less, it still falls within the answer I gave previously, and have repeated once since, where I deliberately stated, (knowing full well your fondness for jumping in feet first) Me stating this, was not an accident, You are altogether too predictable. All one has to do is wait for you to fall into your own big mouth, it doesn't take long, and it's a target you could never miss.

How did I quote you outside your meaning? It was a direct quote... No editing was done... It was directly from your post, and it was the entire statement.

Originally Posted by senojekips

Ahhh,.. but you do, as you keep telling me you don't care, if your statement were true you would ignore it. You are absolutely transparent,as i see it. not a really desirable quality for someone who continually tells lies.

This would be my entertaining of idiots who think they know someone based on an extremely limited experience over the internet... LMAO

Just to make my stance clear, as I've been qouted.

Do I agree with the current "don't ask.don't tell"?

Yes

Do I care about the sexual practices of other persons?

No. Provided they are not foisted upon me as "normal" and having the cavet that i must be accepting of said practices.

Do I think that repeal of "don't ask" is benifical to the military?

Absofreakinglualey not.

The military is not a petrey dish for society. Nor is it a grand social expieriment.

Thanks for providing an insider's view, 03. I'm glad that you don't find homosexuality to be an issue large enough to interfere with your service of this country. And I do agree... There is a time and place to fight the battle for equal rights, but the military is not the place and the time is not now.