yes, I agree he has some responsibilty.

well, finally we agree in something! I want to belive that it was an indirect responsability.

Righteous Victims is not an objective book.
Wikipedia itself is not necessarily an objective place.
The only objectivity you can find is trying to compare verify and doublecheck all the elements of the story.
If I type "Bush is a murderer"and google it up I'll most probably stumble across those very news I was looking for- and will find all the confirmations I needed.

And btw: Sherman might be very young, but seldom have I met a guy who was so much acquainted with the real story of Israel, regardless of European propaganda. He is totally truthful on the Sabra and Chatila massacre.

Originally Posted by Italian Guy

Righteous Victims is not an objective book.
Wikipedia itself is not necessarily an objective place.
The only objectivity you can find is trying to compare verify and doublecheck all the elements of the story.
If I type "Bush is a murderer"and google it up I'll most probably stumble across those very news I was looking for- and will find all the confirmations I needed.

And btw: Sherman might be very young, but seldom have I met a guy who was so much acquainted with the real story of Israel, regardless of European propaganda. He is totally truthful on the Sabra and Chatila massacre.

Righteous Victims is a highly acclaimed book about the Palestinian-Israeli conflict. It methodically (and in great details) walks you through the evolution of the conflict since the late 19th century, until year 2000. It should be noted that most of the early chapters of this book have been mostly based on declassified Israeli, Haganah, and Zionists documents. Benny Morris, the author of the book, is a famous Israeli historian who has written several books and many articles rotating around the al-Nakba and the Palestinian refugees, especially 'The Birth of the Palestinian Refugee Problem´. Why it isn´t objetive?