Which country might be responsible for the disaster of 9/11 - Page 2




 
--
 
November 14th, 2004  
SHERMAN
 
 
Are you joking? Firstly, the Japanese did not use Kamikazee in Pearl Harbor, only later in the war. Secondly...Common. If you make allegations like that you must have some sort of sources. Do you seriously think that 19 Arabs were hired by the Japanese govermen to preform an attack to revenge actions from 60 years ago?!
November 14th, 2004  
USAFAUX2004
 
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kirill K
IMO I have this theory i call "Kamikaze". I believe that Japan could be one of the responsible for doing this terrible disaster. It's because if you think back....... the WW2 ended with 2 A-bombs dropped on Japan. Also remmember the attack on Pearl Harbour, Kamikaze planes falling into the warships and killing inocent people. Then how else can Japan repay USA for total destruction that was dropped on them on Aug. 6 and Aug. 9. They used Kamikaze's to do this mission. Also this would be the country that no one would suspect. Also the qpprotunity at his grasp Bush said that the Arabs were responsible for this disaster. Why you ask?? To get oil from Iraq because they had little contracts with the country, and Iraq as a prospering country, on oil beneath it. Another thing is i believe that the Arabs were unable to plan this attack and carry it out by themselves, because they aren't able to know how to penetrate
the US security systems, to take control of the plane.



I'm not sayin that this is the truth of any sort, but it's something to think about.
Pearl Harbor was a battle, kamikaze was a strategy used later in the war and the A-bombs were droped to end the war, get your history right
November 14th, 2004  
Kirill K
 
HAHAHA i know my history my friend and thats what i clearly said "It's because if you think back....... the WW2 ended with 2 A-bombs dropped on Japan." And now my friends, Kamikazes were used in the WW2 and in Pearl Harbor, its something you should read about. And how do u know maybe they want to get back on USA without nuclear weapons.
--
November 14th, 2004  
USAFAUX2004
 
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kirill K
HAHAHA i know my history my friend and thats what i clearly said "It's because if you think back....... the WW2 ended with 2 A-bombs dropped on Japan." And now my friends, Kamikazes were used in the WW2 and in Pearl Harbor, its something you should read about. And how do u know maybe they want to get back on USA without nuclear weapons.
Pearl harbor '41 was a battle, and there was no need for kamikaze tactics, they fought with honor. When the fleet was not doing so well in '43 they started to crash ships, and the Bombings happaned in '45 so you cannot have actions of '43 happane because of 45' in '41
November 14th, 2004  
Xion
 
uhh, how did ya'll forget good old ally of the US - Pakistan

http://www.military-quotes.com/forum...pic.php?t=6034

Pakistan supports Taliban - Taliban supports Al Qaida - Al Qaida attacks USA.
November 14th, 2004  
A Can of Man
 
 
The House of Saud, which the US is friends with, does not speak or represent the population of Saudi Arabia.
The Royal family is in fact, quite unpopular in several places in that country.
November 15th, 2004  
Xion
 
I saw a documentary on CNN about Saudi Arabia named 'Kingdom On The Brink", though the ppl might be hating the Royal Family, they do have total control over the state and they have some extremely strict islamic laws.Life for westerners is hell there.If you say the Royal family supports the US why don't they change these orthodox islamic religious laws which are reponsible for nurturing terrorism/terrorists ?!?.In fact they also showed some educated muslims trying to coerce the Royals to shift from this extremist path, but they don't budge, hope those who try to alter their thoughts don't get beheaded.
November 15th, 2004  
Damien435
 
 
I think I know where Krill K is going with his ranting, I think he is talking about the five Japanese mini-subs that slipped into the harbor, nine out of the 10 men on board these minisubs died, whether they were meant to be suicide attacks is unclear, the subs did have the capability to head back to the fleet, but in reality that was unlikely in a harbor on lock down. Hell, one of those subs were sunk upon trying to enter the harbor one hour before the attack. But these were not kamikaze's, the mini-subs were armed with torpedoes, they were not meant to just simply run into the boats, in fact I think they all failed in their objectives and sank, except the one that washed up on shore.

The thought that Japan could be responsible for the attacks of 9/11 is ludicrous, Japan's economy also suffered from the attacks, the United States' greatest trade deficit is greatest with Japan over that of any other nation. I also heard that some Palestinian Terrorist group had claimed responsiblity for the attacks of 9/11, but Al Qaeda is the only terror group that had the ability to pull it off, the US would have seen this attack coming from any other nation, we have spies or informants in all the governments that could have pulled this off, but then again the same is most likely true in the other direction. The evidence before and after the attack all pointed towards Al Qeada, Osama Bin Laden is responsible for the attacks, heck, he had a history of such actions.
November 15th, 2004  
Darkmb101
 
No single country is responsible for 9/11 because if they were they would have claimed credit.
November 15th, 2004  
Damien435
 
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Darkmb101
No single country is responsible for 9/11 because if they were they would have claimed credit.
Only two countries would dare do such a thing, Russia or China, I don't think either one could keep it a secret either.