jimmyboy said:hmm i was going to say the UK being patriotic, but our prime minister seems to keen to please america and drags england into amercas wars so we are just as hostile as america as a result
Locke said:the vatican
USAFAUX2004 said:I think that they are hiding something up their sleeves. Why are they so neutral? why do they make their military so small? What if they got some advanced tech and are ready to take over the world, what if they are the next rulers of europe?
Bhutan signed a political Treaty with independent India in 1949, much before it stepped out of its self-imposed isolation in early sixties. According to Article 2 of the Indo-Bhutan Treaty, 1949, at least theoretically, Bhutan is required to consult India in the conduct of its external relations. Although, the basic framework of the bilateral relations may be the Treaty of Friendship and Cooperation of 1949. However, the Treaty which was signed in 1949, has never become an irritant factor in the traditional warm relationship between the two countries. There are frequent state visits between two countries. The Indian ministers and top army brass also keep visiting Bhutan, frequently. India is responsible for Bhutanese security. Indian Military Training Team (IMTRAT) is based in Bhutan to provide training to Bhutanese security forces.
Grimnar said:What about Iceland?
Try to find some information about their armed forces.
Oh.... thats right.... They dont have any.
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.