CIA Blocks Book on Chinese Nuclear Weapons

Lunatik

Active member
An eagerly awaited book on the history of the Chinese nuclear weapons program will not be published due to objections from the Central Intelligence Agency, which said it contains classified information.
A federal court last week ruled (pdf) that the CIA was within its rights to block disclosure of 23 sections of a manuscript by former Los Alamos intelligence specialist Danny B. Stillman, who had brought a lawsuit asserting his First Amendment right to publish the volume.

During the 1990s, Mr. Stillman traveled to China nine times, including six trips that took place after his retirement in 1993. He visited nuclear weapons facilities and “engaged in extensive discussions with Chinese scientists, government officials, and nuclear weapons designers,” resulting in a 506-page manuscript entitled “Inside China’s Nuclear Weapons Program.”

Since he was a Los Alamos employee prior to retirement, and maintained a security clearance thereafter, he submitted his manuscript to the government for pre-publication review, as required by the non-disclosure agreements that he had signed.

His book was written for publication and did not include classified information, in the author’s judgment.

Significantly, the Department of Energy, which has principal classification authority over nuclear weapons design data, concurred. After initial resistance, DOE gave its approval for publication of the entire volume.
But the Central Intelligence Agency, DIA and DoD were opposed.
In a March 30 ruling, Judge Emmet G. Sullivan of the DC District Court wrote that the non-disclosure agreements signed by Mr. Stillman contain “incredibly broad language” with regard to protection of classified information.

And upon review, the Court said it was persuaded that “the government has properly classified the twenty-three passages in Stillman’s manuscript.”

Since those passages constitute about 15% of the total manuscript and include some of the most interesting and valuable information that he gathered in his travels to China, the author said he would not publish the remainder.

http://www.fas.org/blog/secrecy/2007/04/cia_blocks_book.html


You know what? According to the Reporters Without Borders Press Freedom Index, the United States is currently ranked 48th in the world in terms of press freedom. Freaking 48th! Can you believe it? Langley had blocked many pages from Valerie Plame's book Fair Game too, even though the contents weren't classified and had nothing to do with compromising CIA or national security. This is unncessary censorship and it's becoming a dangerous trend. The basic American freedoms and our amendments are no longer respected. To some it might look like a good thing for now, perhaps, but wait until you'll want the world to know something about YOUR case, and you won't be allowed to share that.

Pisses me off! :evil:
 
Last edited:
While I share your sentiment of freedom of speech and press, I agree with the Supreme Court's decision on these matters. Notice how the two examples you stated involved people who used to work for the CIA or <insert 3-lettered acronym agency here related to national security>. Something I've always found interesting and funny is that some people who work for these agencies always want to write some type of tell-all book after they've retired or left the agency. I'm sure there are non-disclosure agreements preventing these types of things but these people always want their 15 minutes of fame. If you don't like the line of work you are in for these agencies, then quit. Just because you don't like the way they do something or know something doesn't give you the right to blab about it. To me, this is no different than a lawyer disclosing his client's case to others. Or a doctor violating physician-patient confidentiality. If you're going into the national security line of work, then just prepare to shut up and do as you're told. If you don't like it, there are hundreds of other jobs out there for you.
 
It's not about fame at all and what they write are far from tell-all books. In former agent Valeri Plame's case, she was undercover with no intention whatsoever to be known in any way (she had no death wish), and it was Robert Novak, a politically-motivated Washington Post journalist, who identified her and blew her covert identity, remember? The book was written entirely in her defense and absolutely no information was shared that'd jeopardize CIA operations or any aspect of national security. This is a very educated woman that was in charge of CIA's nuclear anti-proliferation operations, a wife and mother with great morals and values, and a true American patriot. They did her wrong!

I read it through, it's very informative and eye opening about the inner workings, power circles and the reaches of special interest groups inside our security organizations.

Here you go: http://www.amazon.com/Fair-Game-Age...bs_sr_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1220861944&sr=8-1

516lQy9OjzL._SL500_AA240_.jpg


You'd like it.
 
Last edited:
I don't know if it's really that bad... the freedom of press. I think the US is just under more scrutiny and more people and writers want to dig into things that are secret.

Information like that presented above should just stay away from the public for the most part. Why the hell do you want to know anyway? Interested? Then join the CIA.
 
Back
Top