China's nuclear and ICBM power - Page 2




 
--
 
February 16th, 2005  
gingerbeard
 
intresting sexybeast, i have heard that china's ICBM is much more powerful than what u realy think. i remember reading a source about it, i will try to find them again, its scary if u read what china can do.
February 17th, 2005  
MadeInChina
 
it is, many nuclear strategists can tell you

the chinese missiles are thermonuclear, that is a small fissinb bomb in a fusion outterlayer
February 17th, 2005  
Whispering Death
 
 
Yeah China has about 20 ICBMs capable of reaching the U.S. which coincidentally is the number that the American missile defense shield is designed to shoot down.

It will be interesting to see what China's next move is since for them to try and build more ICBMs of that range would be very very expensive for them.
--
February 19th, 2005  
Sexybeast
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Whispering Death
Yeah China has about 20 ICBMs capable of reaching the U.S. which coincidentally is the number that the American missile defense shield is designed to shoot down.

It will be interesting to see what China's next move is since for them to try and build more ICBMs of that range would be very very expensive for them.
lol...good for U.S, since most of those 20 are DF-5A, which is capable of having 5 warheads (according to missile threat site),...so that is over 80
and we dont know whether it is 20 ICBMs or not..

and china developed DF-31A, and JL-2 (12000km), and new nuke sub which can carry 16 JL-2 and the old one Xia, another 16 JL-2

JL-2 is also capable of having 5 warheads, that is another over 100 warheads hitting U.S

that is already over 150 warheads capable of delivering to U.S, 3 heads for each state,

how many shield missiles U.S deployed ?
February 19th, 2005  
MadeInChina
 
though in missile strategies, the attacker will win mostly

china wont go everycity, probably concentrate the number of missiles per area, so the defensive system is going to be less effective
February 19th, 2005  
Sexybeast
 
is U.S's missile shield thing effective against three stage missiles which can change route in half-way?
February 20th, 2005  
It's all a game
 
Long time to come here.... I really hate to see this China vs USA stuff. But hey, I also can take it as something fun. Here's an old old article, dating back to 1996. To me, it sounds more credible than much of the stuff floating here:

http://www.kimsoft.com/korea/ch-war.htm


And remember, that was 1996 and it is 9 years later now. Do your own math and tell me you still believe those self-deluding numbers some China-haters love to quote of the Chinese nukes?

Again, when it come to nuclear war, I still believe it means the end of all countries on the face of the earth. So please don't count on your good luck just because you live in the deep mountains of West Virginia, say.

... Well, of course, from the perspective of "it's all a game", The End merelly means the beginning of something else (I believe it'd be a lot more fun). So no biggie and let's all "Bring it on!"
February 20th, 2005  
Sexybeast
 
if china can send humans to space..

than it proves that china's missile tech is already mature enough to have soild-fueled ICBMs plus multi-war heads...
February 20th, 2005  
It's all a game
 
Oh, for those of you Americans who really really wants to see the US beating China. Please go lobby your government to push Taiwan to declare independence right away. And you'll find missles and humans flying over the Taiwan Strait, and if your hawks get lucky to succeed in moving your fleets to join the fun, you'll next see your fleets sink, then probably Beijing and Shanghai get nuked and then it's your cities turn and then it's the world's turn... and turning upside down and inside out, meaning Hell on the face of Earth. Haha... What bloody fun! Can't wait the day to come! Really!!
February 20th, 2005  
Sexybeast
 
wow , easy buddy,

i am sure most of americans love peace, and have no desire of a nuclear winter,

although they may dont like china for various of reasons, either logical ones, or purely prejudice