Chertoff: U.S. Still at Risk for Attacks




 
--
Boots
 
August 13th, 2006  
Team Infidel
 
 

Topic: Chertoff: U.S. Still at Risk for Attacks


http://www.breitbart.com/news/2006/08/13/D8JFIELO1.html


the U.S. is remaining vigilant for other attacks after last week's foiled plot to blow up airliners, the nation's chief of homeland security said Sunday, "citing concerns that terror groups may "think we are distracted."
Michael Chertoff, secretary of the Department of Homeland Security, said he expects the Bush administration to keep the U.S. on its highest threat alert for flights headed to the U.S. from the United Kingdom and at its second-highest level for all other flights.

"We haven't fully analyzed the evidence, so we are concerned there are some plotters out there," he said. "We're also concerned about other groups who may carry out attacks because they think we are distracted."
The continuing high level of alert "suggests a real uncertainty about whether they have fully plumbed the scope of the plot, and whether they've wrapped everybody up," Chertoff said. "They also have to be concerned about copycats _ other groups that may think they have the opportunity to carry out a plot."
Police in England have arrested roughly two dozen people, saying they had thwarted a plot to blow up as many as 10 passenger planes flying between Britain and the United States. At the same time, they have stressed the danger has not passed, saying their investigation was continuing.
Chertoff said he would like to see a renewed look at U.S. laws that could give authorities here the flexibility to detain suspects for longer periods of time, noting the British have such latitude.
"I think we should always review the law," Chertoff said. "Certainly the ability to be as nimble as possible with surveillance, and their ability to hold people for a period of time gives them a legal advantage.
"We have to have a legal system to allow us to do that rather than punishing people after the fact," he added.
At the same time, however, Chertoff said he believed that the nation's airline screeners were well-positioned to catch future terrorists and did not anticipate greater restrictions, such as a ban on all carry-on luggage.
"We don't want to burden unnecessarily," he said. "We can do the job with screening, training and technology without banning all carry- ons." Chertoff made the comments on "Fox News Sunday" and ABC's "This Week."
August 13th, 2006  
Chief Bones
 
 

And if you believe this one do I have some swampland for you.

Many of the baggage screeners perfunctorily screen your bags ... I have seen this for myself at several airports. On top of that, the 'sniffer' machines that are present at some of the airports are incapable of detecting these adhoc liquid and semi-paste explosive bombs.

So far, the Bush Administration and the Homeland Security Agency have NOT come up with either a plan, or the necessary funding to tighten security to the point that more of these types of explosives can NOT be smuggled onto an airplane. What they have done is to rely on their present screeners, and NOT ALL screeners are as diligent in their screening as they need to be.

Remember, the terrorists only have to be successful once ... we have to be successful 100% of the time.
August 13th, 2006  
Team Infidel
 
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chief Bones


Remember, the terrorists only have to be successful once ... we have to be successful 100% of the time.
very correct.
--
Boots
 


Similar Topics
The Philippines: Americas First Vietnam and Iraq
Was Lee Whi-So killed by the U.S Government?
Phasing Out US Forces in South Korea
The US roll in central & south America.
Shaking hands with Sadam Hussein