I also go along with the "I told you so" about some of the stuff I've been writting on this forum for sometime now.
Here are some quotes from the linked article that was posted.
A British Muslim group called the Islamic Forum Europe warned the measures could jeopardize national unity in Britain.
I'll buy this up to a point. But if they are going to criticize this, makes me question were their loyalty is in the first place.
"The measures are counterproductive and will encourage more radicalization," said forum President Musleh Faradhi. "Many Muslims will perceive our prime minister as playing into the hands of the terrorists."
By deporting those that fuel radicalism, you will encourage more radicalism? How so?
So just leave them in the country to posibly stir up more fanatics? Hmmm...
He also criticized the government's plans to ban Hizb ut-Tahrir, a radical Islamic group that calls for the formation of an Islamic caliphate and is banned in several countries in Central Asia. Supporters insist it is a nonviolent group persecuted by corrupt governments.
Now you see this groups true intentions, despite all their rhetoric.
They are against banning this group that wants to have a Caliphate (a Caliphate for those of you who don't know is the great Muslim Empire). They believe the formation of this empire as a stepping stone for world domination & conquest.
They are saying this group is non-violent, but somehow they just want to conquer the world (anyone want to buy a bridge in Brooklyn?). What if we don't want to be conquered what then, they will leave us alone, ...yeah sure.
Thats the problem with these people, they say one thing but they mean another. They may not support the terrorist directly, but the reality is, alot of them are for bringing the countries they live in (such as Britain) under total Islamic domination, which they believe someday will happen. Some of these are more radical in how to make it happen but most of them are all working towards the same goal.