![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
|
![]() |
There were lots of designs that were latecomers ... most of which DID NOT affect the outcome of the war. Of those that were very relevant to the War's outcome - so we're only counting tank designs that saw at least 3 years of WW2 service - the Tiger I was unbeatable 1v1. If anyone can think of an exception, please do share.
|
![]() |
|||
![]() |
Quote:
Because thanks to its 17 pdr gun, the Firefly could KO a Panther at up to a 1,000 yards. In a battle between a Firefly and a Panther the winner would tend to be the one who scored a hit first. In a single tank battle near Caen in Normandy a Firefly KO'd 3 Panthers. |
![]() |
|
![]() |
Hmmm, Id go with the Panther agains the firefly, if we are alking about the later modles of the Panther(which is only fair seing the FF is a late model of the Sherman...)
Would take Pershing over Tiger I...Probably equal to KunigTiger. Id like to mention that if you count the Pershing in, than we really must discuss the Centurion and the T44. This makes it very diffecult for me....On the whole, Id say that, apart fromthe very last stages of the war, the Germans were superior, with their Tigers and Panthers. The Russians came a close second with the T34/88 and Stalin III...Americans were a very far 3rd, with the Sherman... |
![]() |
|
![]() |
How many Pershings were actually deployed in World War II? I know that it was during WW2 that the USA realized they needed something better, but I'm not certain how much use the Pershing saw in that war.
As I said, there were a good number of latecomers and the outcome was already obvious by the time they were deployed. I believe that the Tiger II and T44 probably fall into that category, as does the Pershing. |
![]() |