Barack Obama Wins Nobel Peace Prize

Seems to have received it for what he is trying to do, rather than what he has acheived. Perhaps, its not the best time to award it as well, as he is increasing the troop numbers in Afghanistan with little prospect of a peaceful settlement.

There were a record 205 nominations for this year's peace prize. Zimbabwean Prime Minister Morgan Tsvangirai and Chinese dissident Hu Jia had been among the favourites. Many of these had endured extreme risks for their belief. This is very much a political prize.

Perhaps it's a relative Nobel peace prize, relative to George W Bush.
 
THe cut off date for nominations apparently was before he took Office, according to comments on the radio.
 
THe cut off date for nominations apparently was before he took Office, according to comments on the radio.
Looks like it's actually Feb 1, so he'd been in for 10 days. Must have been the promise of peace in our time, wasn't for acomplishment.
 
Whoop de doo. He hasn't earned. What did actually do?

It's anti Bush award.

If he had any respect he'd bow out but his ego won't allow that. Seems his appeasement and apology stratgey worked however.

But the NPP has been a joke since they gave it to Arafat.
 
Well, he's donating all the money that comes with it to charity... That seems to be SOMETHING.

And it is called the Nobel PEACE prize... Not the... You know what... Never mind... Disagreeing words fall upon deaf ears here.
 
I like the guy but he shouldn't have gotten a Nobel Peace Prize at least not yet.
This is an anti-Bush award and the Nobel Peace Prize has become a thing of a bad joke where it's not good work that is rewarded, rather it has become a way some snobs in Sweden give a medal to people who represent their values.
I guess more like a "you should be more like this guy" medal.
Sad thing is, a lot of kids in Korea have their life goal, yes LIFE GOAL as, "to recieve a Nobel Peace Prize." The prize is everything, the work is nothing.
Want a Nobel Peace Prize? Conservative? Never going to happen.

Again, I like the guy but this is a little over the top.
 
Well, he's donating all the money that comes with it to charity... That seems to be SOMETHING.

And it is called the Nobel PEACE prize... Not the... You know what... Never mind... Disagreeing words fall upon deaf ears here.

He's donating the money because he can't accept a monetary award while in office. Read the law.

Peace? What freakin peace? I don't see any peace. He's spouted alot of stuff but thats it.

Maybe he oughta donate it to the ACORN legal defense fund.
 
The peace he's TRYING to promote world-wide... It takes more than a year to quell the fire of thousands of years of hatred. I wish people would give Obama a chance... People supported George Bush till the bitter end... Why can't they let Obama have a fair turn instead of condemning him 9 months into the presidency?


If you'll read the article... It states that he recieved the award for ENGAGING the challenges of today's world... Not fixing everything with the flip of a switch like some conservatives think we were hoping for. But he's DOING something. He's TRYING to make ammends.
 
The peace he's TRYING to promote world-wide... It takes more than a year to quell the fire of thousands of years of hatred. I wish people would give Obama a chance... People supported George Bush till the bitter end... Why can't they let Obama have a fair turn instead of condemning him 9 months into the presidency?


If you'll read the article... It states that he recieved the award for ENGAGING the challenges of today's world... Not fixing everything with the flip of a switch like some conservatives think we were hoping for. But he's DOING something. He's TRYING to make ammends.

Trying don't feed the damn bulldog. Trying don't win you awards. Trying is trying...winning (doing ) is winning (doing) he hasn't done squat to rate this "prize" it's a sham anti-Bush award ....deal with it.

Give him a chance....fine. I've already said some of his domestic policy is commendable if it's done right and has a level of accountability. But much of his foregien policy is a GD cluster @+ck thats has a possibilty of back firing. Couple that with his apparent unability to make a decision on a hot war and you have what?

He's doing nothing but bumping his damn gums.
 
Check this article on Nicholas Sarkozy's response to the announcement. He sums it up best.

http://www.earthtimes.org/articles/...es-great-joy-at-obamas-nobel-peace-prize.html


Not really because in the end he should have at least done something to justify the award and no matter what he wants to achieve it really doesnt amount to a hill of beans until he actually achieves something.

However I think there is a fair bit of misplaced hostility toward Obama over this, he didnt award it to himself the people that need a swift boot in the nuts are the crowd that gave him an award he has done nothing to deserve as yet.

On the whole I think this award is more an indication of the relief that much of the world feels at the departure of the Bush administration than anything else, I think a sizable proportion of the world feel much safer that George no longer has his finger on the button.
 
I woke up and checked my watch... I really thought it was April 1st.... WTF?

I now have no faith.

Ronald Reagan ... Margret Thacher.... Ghandi.... never get the award after a LIFETIME of service and world changing events, but this guy gets it for WHAT? Have you MotherF:cen:ers gone mad?
 
Yeah,...****en locos...freaking America and the world have gone nuts...or could it be prophecies of the anti-christ????
 
In 1948, the year of Gandhi's death, the Nobel Committee declined to award a prize on the ground that "there was no suitable living candidate" that year. Later, when the Dalai Lama was awarded the Peace Prize in 1989, the chairman of the committee said that this was "in part a tribute to the memory of Mahatma Gandhi".

The awards given to Theodore Roosevelt, Woodrow Wilson, Shimon Peres, Yitzhak Rabin, Yasser Arafat, Lê Ðức Thọ and Henry Kissinger were particularly controversial and much-debated. The Kissinger-Thọ award prompted two dissenting Committee members to resign

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nobel_Peace_Prize

Remember Kissinger? part architect of the Chilean Military Coup

"I don't see why we need to stand by and watch a country go communist (should read socialist of course) due to the irresponsibility of its own people. The issues are much too important for the Chilean voters to be left to decide for themselves." — Henry Kissinger

With regard to "Let's bomb the Russians" Reagan and "Belgrano" Thatcher, hardly appropriate, prompting surely more resignations, at least Obama hasn't actually done much either way yet.
 
Last edited:
I woke up and checked my watch... I really thought it was April 1st.... WTF?

I now have no faith.

Ronald Reagan ... Margret Thacher.... Ghandi.... never get the award after a LIFETIME of service and world changing events, but this guy gets it for WHAT? Have you MotherF:cen:ers gone mad?

TI,

The reason Ghandi didn't receive it was simply bad luck. He had the double misfortune of of being politically active during WWII (when the Nobel didn't give out any awards) and being assassinated shortly after the war before he was fully recognized internationally. Had he lived he would have certainly received it but unfortunately Nobels can only be given to the living.

As for Reagan and Thacher, its called the Nobel PEACE prize for a reason, and neither Reagan nor Iron Maggie were very peaceful individuals. Since both were military hawks and both were widely despised outside their countries. Nor were they terribly popular inside their country except amongst the right wing. So I think its rather obvious why they didn't get it.

As for Obama, I think its slightly premature. But I think people (espicially on the right) who accuse it of being a anti-Bush vote need to take note. You dont get Nobels by running America the way Bush did.

Besides, its a Norwegian-Swedish award, they can give it to whoever they want.
 
Last edited:
Reagan and Thatcher assisted in ending the Cold War. That sounds pretty peaceful to me. Again, what the f:cen:k has Obama done to deserve this? NOTHING!!

Other possibilities
The Nobel Committee received a record 205 nominations for this year's Peace Prize. By rule, the names of the nominees (172 individuals and 33 organizations) are kept secret for 50 years. The controversy over President Barack Obama's selection has prompted speculation about who the other nominees were and many people have offered candidates they say are more deserving of the honor.
A selection of other potentially worthy recipients:
Hu Jia: A human rights activist and outspoken critic of the Chinese government. Hu, 36, who was jailed last year for "inciting subversion" before the Olympic Games, is being held in prison on a 3 1/2 year sentence. Fellow dissidents Gao Zhisheng and Wei Jingsheng were also named. Gao disappeared in February after being arrested by Chinese police. Wei spent 17 years in prison before he was released in 1997 and sent to the United States.
Piedad Cordoba: The Colombian senator had been called the leading candidate for her work to release hostages held by left-wing guerrillas. Cordoba, 54, was nominated by another Peace Prize recipient, Adolfo Perez Esquivel, who won in 1980.
Prince Ghazi bin Muhammad: A philosophy professor in Islamic faith at Jordan University and member of the royal family, bin Muhammad, 42, has become known for trying to bridge gaps with other religions.
Sima Samar: An Afghan physician and human rights activist, Samar, 52, is the head of the Afghanistan Independent Human Rights Commission and serves as the U.N. special envoy to Darfur. She established the Shuhada Organization, which focuses on health care, especially for women.
Morgan Tsvangirai: The Zimbabwean opposition leader faced arrest and intimidation in his attempts to unseat President Robert Mugabe. Tsvangirai worked out a tenuous power-sharing agreement with the notorious strongman.
Greg Mortenson: The American founder of the Central Asia Institute was nominated for his work building nearly 80 schools in remote areas of Pakistan and Afghanistan. He writes about his work in the memoir Three Cups of Tea.
Paul Farmer: The Brooksville native established Partners in Health, which brought high-quality health care to victims of HIV/AIDS and tuberculosis in Haiti and other developing nations.
Krisana Kraisintu: The Thai pharmacologist received the 2009 Ramon Magsaysay Award, considered the Asian Nobel Peace Prize, for her work helping to reverse the AIDS epidemic in her country. She successfully formulated a generic version of AZT to treat HIV at one-fourth the cost of the branded product. She has spread her work to sub-Saharan Africa where she opened factories to produce cheaper drugs to fight malaria and HIV/AIDS.
 
Last edited:
Reagan and Thatcher assisted in ending the Cold War. That sounds pretty peaceful to me. Again, what the f:cen:k has Obama done to deserve this? NOTHING!!

So did alot of people, and frankly I think the role was much smaller than say that of Mikeal Gorbachev, Pope John Paul, and Lech Walsa (Polish PM) the latter two were working to end the Cold War when Reagan was still making B rated movies. Then there was all the s*** that happened on their watch in Central and South America which certainly didn't help their chances. Selling weapons to terrorists like Iran certainly didn't help Reagan chance's any nor did the US training of death squads in Nicaragua.

BTW: Both Gorbachev and Welesa DID win the Nobel Peace prize.

Here is a video of Thorbjorn Jaglad explaining why he won: Essentially for his extraordinary efforts to strengthen international diplomacy and cooperation between peoples.

See it here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_fc0CdaPV7U


And as I said: its the Scandinavians prize, they can award it (or not) to whomever they please.
 
Last edited:
thanks.... and it is interesting if you view the past winners of the award here..

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Nobel_Peace_Prize_laureates

It may have been just fine if they did not award anyone this year instead of Obama. I am sorry, but there are many more deserving people able to be given this honor. I just don't see it. I also see a very LIBERAL / LEFT leaning trend towards who has been getting the award over the past several decades.

Welcome to politcs.
 
thanks.... and it is interesting if you view the past winners of the award here..

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Nobel_Peace_Prize_laureates

It may have been just fine if they did not award anyone this year instead of Obama. I am sorry, but there are many more deserving people able to be given this honor. I just don't see it. I also see a very LIBERAL / LEFT leaning trend towards who has been getting the award over the past several decades.

Welcome to politcs.

There is no bias because the RIGHTWING doesnt really exsist in any measureable form in Scandinavia. I worked for 4 years in a Swedish Company, the Swedes view things very different manner then you do. They view people like Bush, Reagan, and Thatcher as people who have escaped the loony bin. Liberalism/Socialism is the overwhelming political thought and it is far more prevalent there than in the USA. Which goes back to what I said: you don win Nobel prizes by bombing people.

Rightwing political theory, which tends to be very aggressive and far less tolerant is not appreciated there. So its not surprising really why the people you mentioned didn't win.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top