Army Recruiting

PJ24

Active member
Army Meets Recruiting Goals for March

The Army met its recruiting goal for March, but lags behind last year's pace as it nears some of the most challenging recruitment months of the year.

The Army has also increased the percentage of recruits it will accept that fall below certain aptitude levels. Now, 4 percent of the annual recruits can score at the lowest acceptable level, compared with 2 percent. The Defense Department has set 4 percent as the maximum amount, but the individual military services can set lower limits.

I really wish they'd get rid of the false idea that lowering standards to get bodies is actually going to help in the long term. :roll:
 
It all depends on if they are using them for infantry *eyes the grunts and thinks of stereotypes* or if they will use them in a more technical field. The schools still have standards to pass or fail people. . . I hope.
 
Reminds me of Project 100,00 during the late 60s or early 70s. A brain fart of Robert MacNamara which was used to get more people in during the VietNam conflict. Not a good idea in my opinion, based on personal experience with some of those people who were in my units (plural) during that time. Lowering of standards is not good for any branch of the Army, especially infantry. I am sure DTop will have his say on this as well.
 
Oh boy....

Do I really want Mr. Dumb Ass next to me in a fox hole with a loaded rifle and grenades.
 
Army surpasses year's retention goal by 15 %.


WASHINGTON — Two of every three eligible soldiers continue to re-enlist, putting the Army, which has endured most of the fighting in Iraq, ahead of its annual goal.
The Army was 15% ahead of its re-enlistment goal of 34,668 for the first six months of fiscal year 2006, which ended March 31. More than 39,900 soldiers had re-enlisted, according to figures scheduled to be released today by the Army.
Strong retention has helped the Army offset recruiting that has failed to meet its targets as the war in Iraq has made it harder to attract new soldiers. The Army fell 8% short of its goal of recruiting 80,000 soldiers in the fiscal year that ended Sept. 30, although it is exceeding its goal this year. Army recruiting figures for the first half of the year are to be released today.
The Army has met or exceeded its goals for retention for the past five years, records show. It was 8% over its goal for 2005, and 7% ahead of its targets for 2004. The number of re-enlistments has exceeded the Army's goal by a larger margin each year since 2001.
Soldiers like the Army, "and the war is not causing people to leave," says Lt. Col. Bryan Hilferty, an Army spokesman. Through March, 2,325 U.S. troops had been killed in Iraq; 1,593 were Army soldiers.
The Pentagon announced in March that each of the armed forces was on track to meet its retention goal for the year.
Pay and re-enlistment bonuses help, Hilferty says. Bonuses range from nothing to $150,000 for a handful of special operations commandos. The average re-enlistment bonus is $6,000, Hilferty says.
"It's not just pay," Hilferty says. "Our people want to be part of something greater than themselves, and they're willing to put up with a lot."
Charles Henning, a national defense analyst with the Congressional Research Service, says robust re-enlistment allows the Army to maintain its strength.
"Retention has been a very positive thing for the Army," Henning says. "That's an indicator of very high morale, high esprit de corps. It's a very solid indicator that soldiers are gratified, or they'd vote with their feet."
In the longer term, the trend could create an older, more expensive-to-maintain Army, according to military sociologist Charles Moskos, an emeritus professor at Northwestern University in Evanston, Ill.
The Army needs to balance career soldiers with younger troops who serve for just a few years, Moskos says.
"It can be financially astounding in terms of retirement and health benefits," Moskos says. "You need more citizen soldiers rather than professionals."
The Army accounts for age when it accepts soldiers for re-enlistment, Hilferty says. While the Army has fewer privates and more specialists than in the past, he says, the age structure is balanced. "We're aware of it, and we're considering. :salute:
 
Re-ups haven't been a problem outside of specific communities, and that's evened itself out a bit more now.
 
Back
Top