After Bailout, AIG Executives Head to Resort

istealfreefood

Active member
Less than a week after the federal government offered an $85 billion bailout to insurance giant AIG, the company held a week-long retreat for its executives at the luxury St. Regis Resort in Monarch Beach, Calif., running up a tab of $440,000, Rep. Henry Waxman (D-Calif.) said today at the the opening of a House committee hearing about the near-failure of the insurance giant.
Showing a photograph of the resort, Waxman said the executives spent $200,000 for rooms, $150,000 for meals and $23,000 for the spa.
"Less than a week after the taxpayers rescued AIG, company executives could be found wining and dining at one of the most exclusive resorts in the nation," Waxman said. "We will ask whether any of this makes sense. "
The committee will ask the company's executives about their multimillion-dollar pay packages -- some of which they continue to receive -- as well as who bears responsibility for the company's high-risk investment portfolio, which led to its near collapse just weeks ago.
"They were getting their manicures, their pedicures, massages, their facials while the American people were paying their bills," thundered Rep. Elijah E. Cummings (D-Md.), of the executive retreat at the Monarch Resort.
The House committee, which took on executive compensation at bankrupt Wall Street firm Lehman Brothers yesterday, has received "tens of thousands" of pages of documents from AIG, Waxman said.
Those documents show that as the company's risky investments began to implode, the company altered its generous executive pay plan to pay out regardless of such losses.
AIG lost over $5 billion in the last quarter of 2007 due its risky financial products division, Waxman said. Yet in March 2008, when the company's compensation committee met to award bonuses, Chief Executive Martin Sullivan urged the committee to ignore those losses, which should have slashed bonuses.
But the board agreed to ignore the losses from the financial products division and gave Sullivan a cash bonus of over $5 million. The board also approved a new compensation contract for Sullivan that gave him a golden parachute of $15 million, Waxman said.

Joseph Cassano, the executive in charge of the company's troubled financial products division, received more than $280 million over the last eight years, Waxman said. Even after he was terminated in February as his investments turned sour, the company allowed him to keep up to $34 million in unvested bonuses and put him on a $1 million-a-month retainer. He continues to receive $1 million a month, Waxman said.
Waxman also looked skeptically at the executives' defense that the troubles in the business had to do with larger economic forces and not their own bad decisions.
When a former AIG auditor, Joseph St. Denis, expressed concerns, Cassano told him "I have deliberately excluded you from the valuation ... because I was concerned that you would pollute the process," according to Waxman.
St. Denis resigned in protest.
PricewaterhouseCoopers, AIG's auditor, told the company in March 2008 that the "root cause" of AIG's problems was that people assessing risk did not have enough access to the financial products division, where the risky investments originated.
Waxman further suggested that Sullivan had deliberately misled investors.
On Dec. 5, 2007, Sullivan expressed confidence to investors. But a week before, PricewaterhouseCoopers warned Sullivan that the company "could have a material weakness relating to these area," committee members said.

http://voices.washingtonpost.com/li...er_bailout_aig_executives_h.html?hpid=topnews








Now that is some BS! You get billions of dollars to bail your company out of the hole it helped dig itself into, and then you blow a bunch of it on an expensive vacation for the executives. That aint right!
 
By the way, last week, George Bush agreed to lend $25bn to US car manufacturers. It’s a soft loan, which will cost the government $7.5bn. Few people noticed; fewer fought it. The House of Representatives approved the measure by 370 votes to 58. The great corporate bail-out is spreading like the plague.

It has already crossed the Atlantic. Yesterday European car makers demanded that the EU hand them E40bn ($54bn) in cheap loans to match the US subsidy.

It is socialism for corporations again, but don't worry we we be back to capitalism once the economy gets going again.
 
This just reaffrims my commitment not to vote for any incumbents in the next two or three elections, except in my County elections. If you currently have a house or senate seat (State or Federal) don't bother me. I'm voting for whoever runs against you regardless of party.
 
Good Story...I still think the bailout was necessary but if I hear anymore of these incidents I will be seriously displeased with those who voted in favor of it come next election.
 
By the way, last week, George Bush agreed to lend $25bn to US car manufacturers. It’s a soft loan, which will cost the government $7.5bn. Few people noticed; fewer fought it. The House of Representatives approved the measure by 370 votes to 58. The great corporate bail-out is spreading like the plague.

It has already crossed the Atlantic. Yesterday European car makers demanded that the EU hand them E40bn ($54bn) in cheap loans to match the US subsidy.

It is socialism for corporations again, but don't worry we we be back to capitalism once the economy gets going again.

This is all surely about jobs. Capitalism hasn't gone away. Socialism has gone. Social - Capitalism is the change of direction. We need to avoid a financial crisis from turning into an economic crisis.
 
Last edited:
I'm starting to miss public executions.

Kind of like what the Chinese did to their land lords. Those guys got what they deserved. Too bad we can't say the same for these guys.
 
I'm starting to miss public executions.

Kind of like what the Chinese did to their land lords. Those guys got what they deserved. Too bad we can't say the same for these guys.

In the UK they used to have debtors prisons, those inside remained there until someone paid off their debts. Perhaps the bankers (I am an awful speller) should take responsibility for those they have put into debt! Surely lending sub prime is no different to being a loan shark?
 
Sounds like a grand idea. But I prefer the way Mussolini and a whole stack load of Chinese land owners went.
The Chinese may have had it worse.
But they got what they deserved.
 
UPDATE

Apparently AIG has canceled another such Hotel vacation for this weekend citing cost concerns. I swear it took AIG a single week to embarrass Bush and Paulson since both wanted no congressional oversight during the discussions with Congress. I should have known anything out of Bush mouth was a bad idea.

Federal Charges are needed.
 
Last edited:
There should be a bailout, but it should come from the wallets of the bank owners. And such a move should be mandatory, not voluntary.
 
negative, not just one set of guilty parties, all guilty parties, it is much more than those than just with the banks.
 
Most of this problem was born out of the affirmative action credit lending. Of course, greed is also in the air, but the birth came from the affirmative action spirit of the credit.
 
The deregulation of the market back in the late 90s-early 00s played a very big role. Had it not been deregulated this would not have been allowed to happen.
 
Back
Top