20th Century Heroes & Villains

Ollie Garchy

Active member
What do you guys think of the following list by a favourite journalist of mine? I personally like the Stalin and Roosevelt sections.​

The century's greatest heroes and its bloodiest villains

By Eric Margolis (Jan 2000)


One hundred years ago, most people earnestly believed the dawning 20th century would bring a golden age of technology-based prosperity, reason in human conduct, an end to war, and remarkable advancement of all mankind.

Instead of a golden era of humanism, the 20th Century became the bloodiest era in the past 1,000 years. To avoid repeating the crimes and horrors of the century just past, we must study - and restudy - its political heroes and villains. The heroes may not return, but the villains and their malevolent thinking certainly will. Study history, as Santayana warned, or relive it.

HEROES

*Konrad Adenauer - Took over leadership of a ruined, defeated, disgraced Germany, in 1949, which was still under foreign occupation. In fourteen years, the Adenauer government organized the rebuilding of Germany from rubble, its restoration to international respectability, and its re-emergence as a world power. Dignified, stern and upright, Adenauer symbolized all that was good in the old Germany.

*Winston Churchill - A deeply flawed hero. A great war leader, historian, and brilliant actor who brought out the pride and valor of Britons. But Churchill, the century’s most ardent imperialist and leader of Britain’s war pro-war faction in two world wars, was so blinded by his hatred of Germany, that he ended up destroying the British Empire, and, with Roosevelt, handing half of Europe over to Stalin’s tyranny. Hitler, not Churchill, saved Britain in 1940 by refusing to destroy the trapped British armies at Dunkerque and declining to invade prostrate England - in vain hope of an Anglo-German alliance against the USSR.

*Charles DeGaulle - A majestic figure of profound dignity, foresight, moral energy, determination and style. He almost single-handedly saved France from the ignominy of defeat by Germany in 1940, rekindling the pride, elan, and power of his great nation. DeGaulle was the only Allied leader who understood the Soviet threat. After the war, his embrace of old foe Germany laid the foundation for united Europe. In spite of the spiteful mockery of his Anglo-American allies, among the greatest of the great.

*Deng Xioping - Deng seized power in China after Mao’s death in 1976 and ended the dementia of the Cultural Revolution that killed 2 million people and nearly destroyed China. In 20 years, Great Reformer Deng transformed China from a vast, impoverished prison camp into a dynamic nation destined to become a world power. Deng deftly dismantled communism and Mao’s totalitarian system, releasing the Chinese peoples’ inherent energy and talent, and brought China into modern world. Under Deng, the income of Chinese jumped tenfold. Deng laid the foundation for a future more politically relaxed China that resembles modern Singapore. History will hold Deng a greater revolutionary than Mao Tse-tung.

*Dwight Eisenhower - The best president of the 20th Century and the finest American. Eisenhower personified the admirable qualities of Americans: energy, simplicity, forthrightness, confidence, and decency. Eisenhower’s years as president marked the high point of good government and civic values - before made-for-television politicians degraded and besmirched and cheapened the presidency. I like Ike.

*Mohandas Gandhi - The greatest Indian of the millenium. A leader spiritual and temporal who combined moral saintliness with political cunning and inspiring leadership. Gandhi’s crusade for non-violence, human rights, religious tolerance and aiding the helpless were a beacon of light in the 20th Century’s darkness - particularly since he did so on a vast subcontinent where none of these qualities were known. Though the racist Churchill dismissed Gandhi as ‘a half-naked fakir,’ the Indian sage will likely be regarded by future historians as the noblest and most important human being of the 20th Century- and, of course, the father of Indian independence.

*Mikhail Gorbachev - A tragic yet admirable figure who did not understand that communism was not an economic system, but one of mass control and intimidation. Gorbachev’s attempts to reform and modernize communism, and the even more important rejection of class struggle and international revolution by Foreign Minister Eduard Shevardnadze, destroyed the Evil Empire that was Soviet Union. Gorbachev’s refusal to use tanks to crush nationalist uprising in the USSR and Eastern Europe, and his withdrawal of Soviet forces from Germany, saved the world from a war that could have easily gone nuclear. Today, he is reviled by Russians. History, however, will view him as man who was too decent and humane to perpetuate the Soviet Empire.

*David Ben Gurion - Modern patriarch of the Jewish people, he led his people out of the wilderness of the Holocaust into the promised land of Israel. A man of Biblical majesty and enormous inner power, without Ben Gurion the state of Israel may not have succeeded. Tragically, the price of the Jewish homeland was the eviction of a million Palestinians from their ancestral homeland, a problem which has yet to be resolved half a century later.

*Pope John Paul II - Stalin once asked, sarcastically, ‘how many divisions has the Pope?’ The answer came three decades later in the form of Pope John Paul II. This Polish warrior pope helped raise the storm winds that finally blew down the evil edifice of communism and freed the long- suffering peoples of Eastern Europe who had been condemned by Roosevelt and Churchill at Yalta to Soviet totalitarian rule. Great warrior, great humanist, he renewed the vigor and teachings of the Catholic Church, and expelled the marxist priests who had infested it. If there ever was a true saint, it is John Paul II. The greatest pope since the Renaissance.

*Jean Juares - French humanitarian, thinker and martyr, his voice thundered at the beginning of the century for the rights of the common man. His calls for Franco-German brotherhood presage the European Union. Juares was assassinated for opposing France’s entry into World War I, the greatest disaster of the century.

*Imam Ruhollah Khomeini - A Shia cleric of enormous moral stature, he sparked an historic revolution in Iran that overthrew the US-run regime of the vainglorious, thieving, hated Shah, Reza Pahlavi, freeing Iran from 30- years of western exploitation, inspiring Islamic revolutionaries from Morocco to the Philippines. Khomeini showed that ideas and faith were more powerful than police states.

*Gamal Abdel Nasser - Nasser electrified the entire Third World and personified the struggle against British and French colonialism. Though he suffered disastrous military defeats and economic failures, Nasser still managed to instill a sense of pride and manhood in the demoralized Arab and Muslim world. His strength, honesty, concern for his people, and determination to restore Egypt’s long lost dignity, made Nasser a titan among Mideast leaders. Egyptians still call him El Rais’ the boss.

*Ronald Reagan - A simple man wise enough to know right from wrong in a confusing, morally ambiguous world, Reagan, like Eisenhower, brimmed with optimism and decency. Intellectuals and the media scoffed at him, but ordinary Americans knew what a truly great and good man Reagan was. Against all advice, Reagan challenged the Soviet Empire and defeated this scourge of mankind. His impending death will break America’s heart.

*Margaret Thatcher - A grocer’s daughter who managed to overcome Britain’s poisonous class structure, restore the jejune Conservative Party, and rescue her nation from the swamp of socialism into which it was sinking fast. The toughest politician in Britain, she and Ronald Reagan led the free world to victory in the Cold War. Thatcher is the greatest woman of the century.

*Theodore Roosevelt - A true man’s president. Adventurer, outdoorsman, explorer, Teddy Roosevelt captured the robust spirit of a young, dynamic America and the wild west. When an American named Ian Pedicaris was kidnapped by the Barbar chieftan El-Rasaouli, Teddy R. wired him, ‘Pedicaris alive, or El-Rasaouli dead.’ A bully president and a memorable American.
 
VILLAINS

*Heinrich Himmler - A sadist and monster, Himmler made his SS organization into an industrial scale killing machine of Jews and other ‘inferior’ races. His racist brutality turned the Ukraine and western Russia against the Germans, who had been welcomed as liberators from Stalin. Small-minded, arrogant, and efficient, he personified the worst in the German psyche.

*Adolf Hitler - A frustrated artist who saw himself as the ‘Nordic Christ,’ and Germans as ‘the chosen people,’ Hitler was the almost inevitable result of Germany’s humiliation after World War I. An idealist, he was determined to better mankind by purging the world of inferior races and peoples - and smokers. Hitler’s Reich murdered 12 million people, half of them Jews. If Britain had the right to colonial rule over India and Egypt, Hitler asked, why did Germany not have the right to rule Poland and Russia? In 1942, Hitler told the Duce, ‘My dearest wish would be able to wander about in Italy as an unknown painter.’ Hitler rightly predicted the Soviet Union would become a mortal peril to Europe and America.

*Josef Stalin - Genghis Khan with tanks. An extraordinary monster, the biggest mass murderer since the Mongols - perhaps the biggest in all history. Everyone was Stalin’s enemy. Power was everything. Stalin presided over the murder of 40 million of his own people and the imprisonment of tens of millions of Russians and East Europeans. The master terrorist of all time, Stalin knew how to conjure fear and obedience on a mass scale. He repeatedly outwitted the bumbling Roosevelt and Churchill and infiltrated their governments with his agents. A despot whose names inspires fear and respect(in Russia) to this day. The real victor of WWII in Europe.

*Lazar Kaganovitch - Stalin called him ‘my Himmler.’ Kaganovitch personally supervised the murder of 6-7 million Ukrainian peasants in the mid-1930’s - a decade before Hitler’s crimes - and went on to organize the mass murder of 2 million Muslims in the Caucasus and deportation of another 2 million to Siberia. This work continues today as Russian forces complete their Mongol-style destruction of tiny Chechnya.

*Kim Il Sung - North Korea’s communist despot, Kim, who began the Korean War that killed over 2 million of his people, was noteworthy for creating - along with Albania’s Enver Hoxha - the most lunatic totalitarian regime on earth, turning North Koreans into brainwashed robots, an Orwellian monstrosity that still persists.

*Vladimir Lenin - Falsely portrayed by historical revisionists as the ‘good’ communist whose ideas were later corrupted, Lenin was, in fact, the father of the system of ‘Red Terror’ which resulted in the death of some 40 million Soviet citizens from 1922-1953. Stalin merely expanded on and perfected the institutionalized repression created by the utterly ruthless, brilliant, iron- willed Lenin who was determined to impose marxism on the world. Life meant nothing; the Party was everything, according to this perverted genius, the very worst of the many bloody-minded intellectuals who brought untold suffering to this century.

*Mao Zedong - Brilliant, determined, visionary, colorful, Mao defeated the nationalists and Japan, and unified China. Two million ‘landlords’ were shot. Mao woke China from centuries of sleep, and laid the basis for a modern nation. But he created a grim , totalitarian police state that rivaled Stalin’s USSR. Mao’s’reforms,’ so lauded by the CBC and western liberal admirers, bankrupted China and led to the death of 30 million peasants. The Cultural Revolution unleashed by the dying Mao killed another 2 million people and saw China’s greatest art treasures destroyed, the worst act of cultural vandalism in modern history.

*Mengistu Haile Mariam - The bloodiest of Africa’s modern tyrants, in 1973 Mariam overthrew Emperor Haile Selassie and embarked on the communization of Ethiopia under Soviet guidance. Farmers who resisted collectivization were denied food and seeds: 1.5 million were starved to death while fuddled Canada aided the Mengistu regime, even flying food to its troops. Hundreds of thousands of Ethiopians were tortured and murdered. Today, mass murderer Mengistu resides comfortably in exile in Tanzania while Chile’s former leader, Gen. Pinochet, is held by Britain on flimsy Spanish charges his security forces killed 2,600 marxist rebels and civilians.

*Benito Mussolini - A strutting popinjay, a windbag, a buffoon from comic opera, he made Italy look very silly. Though largely inoffensive in Europe, the Duce’s Fascist Legions used poison gas and concentration camps extensively in Libya and Ethiopia. Mussolini was a great orator, great dresser, and made the trains run on time - until bombed to smithereens by the Allies. Clever Italians have managed to convince most people that they were actually on the Allied side during WWII. Though a very minor malefactor, Mussolini proved even fools can be dangerous.

*Pol Pot - A vicious teacher turned ideologue, he combined the worst of Cambodian nationalism with Maoist ideology and dementia. Pot and his Khmer Rouge sought to create a perfect agrarian society -‘led by the communist party - by killing anyone with an education. A million Cambodians were slaughtered in the name of ‘agrarian reform.’

*Franklin Roosevelt - A clever, flamboyant American leader idolized by Democrats as the greatest president. But recent revelations from Soviet KGB archives show FDR’s administration was riddled with communist agents and sympathizers who ended up virtually directing US foreign policy during the war. Roosevelt(and Churchill) prolonged the war and aided the Soviet advance into Eastern Europe by refusing to negotiate a surrender with Germany. In effect, Roosevelt defeated a lesser tyrant - Hitler - by allying himself to a far greater criminal - Stalin, who had killed tens of millions of people before 1939. At Yalta, Roosevelt and Churchill gave half of Europe to Stalin in payment for defeating Hitler.

*Woodrow Wilson - Named here not because he was an evil man, but because he was a good man whose wrongheaded idealism helped create the greatest disaster of the century: the end of World War I and its aftermath. Gulled by British propaganda, Wilson foolishly sent American troops to fight on the Western Front, thus giving victory to the Allies in a previously stalemated war. Had US troops stayed out of the conflict, the Allies and Central Powers would have come to a negotiated peace settlement that punished no nation for a war that began virtually by accident. This would very likely have prevented the century’s two worst scourges: the Bolshevik Revolution in Russia and the rise of the Nazis in Germany. Instead, Wilson watched helplessly as Britain and France ground Germany into the dust and carved up the empires of their defeated foes - leading directly to today’s conflicts in the Balkans and Middle East.

*Papa Doc Duvalier - The consummate master of evil. A country doctor turned despot, Francois Duvalier imposed a reign of terror over Haiti that was exceptional for the supernatural fear he inflicted on his people. High priest of Ongan (voodoo), and a ruthless dictator, Papa Doc was said to read people’s minds and turn the dead into zombies. The most frightening person this writer has met.

http://www.ericmargolis.com/archives/2000/01/the_centurys_gr.php
 
I liked the Pope John Paul II and Winston Churchill sections...And Adolf Hitler...Maybe FDR should have been put under both hero and villan...He did do something to get us outta the Depression...
 
Wow put good ol' FDR in with Adolf, Josef and Heinrich, that is a new one on me! Because his administration might have been riddled with agents doesn't make him the uber-mass murderers some of the other villains are. John Paul and Khomeini is cleric hero's is also doubtful to say the least. The catholic ineptness to dealing with aids and prohibiting the use of condoms make the almost in the same league of (indirect) murderes as many of the villains. Let's just say I have my doubts, but some names are well merited on this list.
 
Ted said:
The catholic ineptness to dealing with aids and prohibiting the use of condoms make the almost in the same league of (indirect) murderes as many of the villains.

You really went too far with that one.
 
Last edited:
I personally think this guy deserves a kick in the nuts, hourly. Listing FDR and Roosevelt as villians... is just plain stupid. If Wilson is listed as a villian why not Georges Clemenceau and David Lloyd George? Oh, could it be because those two had a much more profound and direct impact on world history but in a not-so positive way? I mean come on, he is villianizing the only man who tried to prevent WWII prior to WWII. Wilson's plan for a post war Germany would have prevented a person like Hitler from rising to power, but oh no, he's a bad guy because he ended one war and tried to prevent another.

FDR. Are you :cen:ing kidding me? The mad did everything BUT declare war on Germany and Japan to try and get America involved in this war. Americans were fighting in Europe before December 7, 1941 and FDR was anything but impartial in who he traded with during the war. I am fairly confident that if you check who received what VIA lend-lease you will find that not much went to Germany, most of it went to Britain and the USSR.
 
I agree with Damien, You cannot call Wilson a villan, and leave out Clemencau and Lloyd George. They not only :cen: germany up right and proper, but also the Middle East, and Africa.

And that journalist who wrote this list, must be extremly foolish to think that the Allies and Axis would have negoitated a peace had the US not enter the war. France was humiliated at the end of the Franco-Prussian War, and wanted revenge, and the British Politicans did not want to face an election, without the victory they had promised. They would accept only an unconditional surrender from Germany.
 
Bory said:
I agree with Damien, You cannot call Wilson a villan, and leave out Clemencau and Lloyd George. They not only :cen: germany up right and proper, but also the Middle East, and Africa.

And that journalist who wrote this list, must be extremly foolish to think that the Allies and Axis would have negoitated a peace had the US not enter the war. France was humiliated at the end of the Franco-Prussian War, and wanted revenge, and the British Politicans did not want to face an election, without the victory they had promised. They would accept only an unconditional surrender from Germany.

Hello,

Margolis is seriously anti-communist. For this reason, he does not argue that the destruction of Germany represented the greatest democratic achievement in history. If that is the "end" of history, then fine. History is over.

Listen to yourselves. "France was humiliated at the end of the Franco-Prussian War, and wanted revenge, and the British Politicans did not want to face an election, without the victory they had promised. They would accept only an unconditional surrender from Germany". International relations (and human life) is reduced to a thirst for revenge or electoral realities. France and Britain have the right to subject other populations to whatever they want. That is cynicism on a grand scale. But, again, fine. Hitler and Stalin followed a similar pattern. Churchill, Hitler, Roosevelt and Stalin were essentially the same monsters. Only the death totals were different. Life was worthless in the first half of the 20th Century.

That is what I like about Margolis. He is not afraid to voice his opinions.

[By the way, Roosevelt hated Germans primarily because a German girl once rejected his sexual advances during his studies at Göttingen. Feeling snubbed, he took out his massive frustrations on millions of people. My God, that is pathetic].
 
PJ24 said:
You really went too far with that one.

I actually gave it quite a lot of thought whether or not to say that, but I chose to do so. These guys just get my blood bloiling with their caring-for-the-world-cause-we-know-better attitude. You have this extreme conservative cleric group making rules about peoples and cultures thousands of miles away. They know that the Catholics there listen to them, but they also know that these same people indulge in sexual escapades (as do they too). And denying these people the simple protection of a condom is beyond me. I do know that it helped to spread HIV! And to me that is being an acomplise to murder. You premeditated the prohibition of condoms and you know that HIV kills!
 
Oh, boy...Take cover men, we are about to see some bombshells dropped here...I highly doubt the the President would take out frustrations on millions of people because of one girl...If you could, cite a source for the comment where President Roosevelt said," This one German girl rejected me so Im gonna get the US involved in a war against Germany, even though I know hundreds of thousands of lives will be lost." Then my friend, I will truely be a believer.

EDIT: Ted, the Catholic Pope prohibited condoms because Catholics believe that one should not have sex before marriage. That being said, what do you need a condom for if you arent afraid of getting your wife pregnant. If you are, then dont have sex. And I highly doubt the POPE had sex before marriage...oh wait, did the pope ever get married?
 
Last edited:
*Deng Xioping - Deng seized power in China after Mao’s death in 1976 and ended the dementia of the Cultural Revolution that killed 2 million people and nearly destroyed China. In 20 years, Great Reformer Deng transformed China from a vast, impoverished prison camp into a dynamic nation destined to become a world power. Deng deftly dismantled communism and Mao’s totalitarian system, releasing the Chinese peoples’ inherent energy and talent, and brought China into modern world. Under Deng, the income of Chinese jumped tenfold. Deng laid the foundation for a future more politically relaxed China that resembles modern Singapore. History will hold Deng a greater revolutionary than Mao Tse-tung.

Where in the name of all that is unholy did they source this crap?!

Deng was at the helm and personally ordered the crackdown on demonstrators at Tianamen Square in 1989. This pisses me off.
 
What strikes me is that many, me included, take all these different approaches to this list. There are enough things to say about Deng that will not make him look like a hero to me... and Buldogg too (but that was already obvious) So who was responsible for making this list again?
 
Ted said:
I actually gave it quite a lot of thought whether or not to say that, but I chose to do so. These guys just get my blood bloiling with their caring-for-the-world-cause-we-know-better attitude. You have this extreme conservative cleric group making rules about peoples and cultures thousands of miles away. They know that the Catholics there listen to them, but they also know that these same people indulge in sexual escapades (as do they too). And denying these people the simple protection of a condom is beyond me. I do know that it helped to spread HIV! And to me that is being an acomplise to murder. You premeditated the prohibition of condoms and you know that HIV kills!

The fact that you would sit and call Catholics murderers doesn't sit well with me at all, and frankly, stinks of ignorant bashing.
 
PJ24 said:
The fact that you would sit and call Catholics murderers doesn't sit well with me at all, and frankly, stinks of ignorant bashing.

Bashing... okay, you might be right there. Ignorant, I would call me ignorant, at least not on that specific issue. During my Uni years I had quite a few classes about developmental issues and this came up too. And the occasions where you could say that the Catholic church did real solid developmental work are countable on one hand! But the examples of classic, colonial approach are still numerous. And that doesn't sit well with me. That is why I called it indirect murder or accomplise to murder. Maybe the latter should be brought back to: accomplise to not providing protection and due to this other people died. The fact that they knew what would happen and that they still said; wearing a rubber is wrong and against biblical values! Again, it makes my blood boil!
 
C/1Lt Henderson said:
Oh, boy...Take cover men, we are about to see some bombshells dropped here...I highly doubt the the President would take out frustrations on millions of people because of one girl...If you could, cite a source for the comment where President Roosevelt said," This one German girl rejected me so Im gonna get the US involved in a war against Germany, even though I know hundreds of thousands of lives will be lost." Then my friend, I will truely be a believer.

EDIT: Ted, the Catholic Pope prohibited condoms because Catholics believe that one should not have sex before marriage. That being said, what do you need a condom for if you arent afraid of getting your wife pregnant. If you are, then dont have sex. And I highly doubt the POPE had sex before marriage...oh wait, did the pope ever get married?

Which Pope are you refering to?
 
I don't believe the Hungarian people consider Ike a hero. The back door deal he brokered gave the Brits and Frogs free reign in the Suez and allowed the nacent Warsaw Pact to crush Imre Nagy's Hungarian Independance movement. In doing so, economic colonialism was perpetuated in the Middle East and the precedant set for the death of '68's Prague Spring.
Al that being said, the lists are interesting and reflect a certain Euro-centric perspective. The description of De Gaulle might not be appreciated by many Frenchmen.
 
Ted said:
Bashing... okay, you might be right there. Ignorant, I would call me ignorant, at least not on that specific issue. During my Uni years I had quite a few classes about developmental issues and this came up too. And the occasions where you could say that the Catholic church did real solid developmental work are countable on one hand! But the examples of classic, colonial approach are still numerous. And that doesn't sit well with me. That is why I called it indirect murder or accomplise to murder. Maybe the latter should be brought back to: accomplise to not providing protection and due to this other people died. The fact that they knew what would happen and that they still said; wearing a rubber is wrong and against biblical values! Again, it makes my blood boil!

Nope, I'm sticking with ignorant religion bashing.
 
Last edited:
Ollie Garchy said:
[By the way, Roosevelt hated Germans primarily because a German girl once rejected his sexual advances during his studies at Göttingen. Feeling snubbed, he took out his massive frustrations on millions of people. My God, that is pathetic].

Not saying that this isn't true but could you post a source for this along with proof of the insight on whether he took out his frustrations on millions of people? No gobbledegook allowed.
 
Missileer said:
Not saying that this isn't true but could you post a source for this along with proof of the insight on whether he took out his frustrations on millions of people? No gobbledegook allowed.

Sorry guys. That annecdote was only from memory. I cannot for the life of me remember where. I tried the "net" but to no avail. My memory might be somewhat defective these days.

Anyway, here is something equally interesting. Roosevelt was arrested in Germany. "FDR was once arrested — four times in one day! At age 14, he sailed to Europe with his tutor, Arthur Dumper, and one day they embarked on a bicycle tour of the Black Forest in Germany. Roosevelt later confessed that authorities had arrested them for knocking over a goose, picking cherries, parking bicycles at a railroad station and cycling after sunset. FDR said in each case, he managed to talk them out of trouble ‘‘in my best company German.’’"

My aim in recounting the original story -- now it is in any case interesting that Roosevelt had a good command of German -- was to try to reduce realpolitik to something less mysterious and closer to home. People form their ideas from personal experience. There is a good dissertation on the subject cited below. If you read a bit of it and think about how Roosevelt's worldview formed, it all seems quite primitive.

http://www.poughkeepsiejournal.com/projects/fdr/stories/story_21.shtml

https://drum.umd.edu/dspace/bitstream/1903/1393/1/umi-umd-1397.pdf
 
Back
Top