So how do we know that Iran wants the Bomb?
Read this expert's analysis http://bit.ly/q1aZLh
Read this expert's analysis http://bit.ly/q1aZLh
Any mention of an Iranian nuclear weapon is taboo in the Islamic Republic, which insists that its nuclear programme is entirely for peaceful, civil purposes.I think we have 100 reasons that Iran never and never want atomic bombs, please think and research about that reasons.
OK, I know my government is honest with me in this matter because I listen and see with my eye and ear and I sure that my country don`t want bomb. It`s very clear for me. History can teach us if we look good from ancient to now.
OK, I know my government is honest with me in this matter because I listen and see with my eye and ear and I sure that my country don`t want bomb. It`s very clear for me. History can teach us if we look good from ancient to now. My friends, we can use gas for product and industrial NO for burning and energy.Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad claims Iran does not need nuclear arms and that his country is only asserting its right to peaceful nuclear technology, as allowed under the nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT). Unfortunately, countries such as Israel made similar denials in the mid-1960s when they were developing nuclear weapons, so any such denials ought to be taken with a grain of salt.
In Iran's case, Ahmadinejad needs to be asked why it is so essential for Iran to gain nuclear power stations when the country is sitting on one of the most plentiful gas supplies in the world.
OK, I know my government is honest with me in this matter because I listen and see with my eye and ear and I sure that my country don`t want bomb. It`s very clear for me. History can teach us if we look good from ancient to now. My friends, we can use gas for product and industrial NO for burning and energy.
Do you think this gas can support Iran and other countries that import it from Iran for all of the futures?
(CNN) -- The International Atomic Energy Agency issued a critical report Tuesday saying that it has "serious concerns" about Iran's nuclear program and has obtained "credible" information that the Islamic republic may be developing nuclear weapons.
The IAEA report, the most detailed to date on the Iranian program's military scope, found no evidence that Iran has made a strategic decision to actually build a bomb. But its nuclear program is more ambitious and structured, and more progress has been made than previously known.
"The agency has serious concerns regarding possible military dimensions to Iran's nuclear program," the report said. "After assessing carefully and critically the extensive information available to it, the agency finds the information to be, overall, credible. The information indicates that Iran has carried out activities relevant to the development of a nuclear explosive device."
Of course they will say that, only a muppet would think otherwise, they WANT Iran out of the way, they lied about Iraq, why not about Iran?
Of course they will say that, only a muppet would think otherwise, they WANT Iran out of the way, they lied about Iraq, why not about Iran?
So the vision of an Middle East un settled by the prospect that Iran as a nuclear power causes other countries there to then rush in creating nuclear programs as a deterrent against Iran is a settling idea?
Or the prospect of a Unstable leadership accidentally "losing" a device only to have it appear in the back of a van inside Israel either being used as it's a intended purpose or as a radiation device?
We use essential cookies to make this site work, and optional cookies to enhance your experience.