| |
| | Post 1641 |
| Milforum Moderator ![]() | FN Browning Hi-Power?
__________________ |
| |
| | Post 1642 | |
| Immunes | Quote:
I believe the British Army still uses the High Power. Last edited by Papashah41; September 21st, 2008 at 17:44. | |
| |
| | Post 1643 |
| Milforum Moderator ![]() | During the German Advance into france, a certain counter-attack caused a small panic to German generals, including Rommel. 1)Where was this counter attack made? 2)Which unit mounted it? 3)With what primery weapon? 4)How did Rommel break the counter-attack? |
| |
| | Post 1644 | |
| Immunes | Quote:
2. Lord Gort commander of the B.E.F. ordered two infrantry battalions of the 50th division and the 1st army tank brigade. 3. With 58 Mark 1 Matildas armed with the 2 pounder. 4. Rommel broke the counter attack by frantically forming a gun line with artillery and the 88mm anti-aircraft guns. Rommel also radiod the Panzers ahead. The Panzers arrived at the rear and flank of the British and an armoured Donnybrook commenced. The German's destroyed 7 Matildas and 6 anti-tank guns. But they lost 3 Pzkpf 4's and 6 Pzkpf 3's and a number of lighter tanks. The Germans also lost 387 men. The British fell back to Arras. Last edited by Papashah41; September 22nd, 2008 at 21:59. | |
| |
| | Post 1645 |
| Milforum Moderator ![]() | nearly. just one mistake there Edit: You know what, ill take that. The British main tank was indeed the Matilda Mk 1(58 alltogather), however these were not armed with the 2 pounder. What was probably more significant, was the presence of 16 Matilda Mk 2 tanks, armed with the 2 pounder and armoured to an extent that the German anti tank weapons could not penetrate them. Last edited by SHERMAN; September 22nd, 2008 at 17:15. |
| |
| | Post 1646 | |
| Immunes | Quote:
The next question may appear hard but there is much ample material out there for one with investigative worth. The 7.5 cm Pak 40 was adopted in 1940 as the standard anti-tank gun of the German forces. But another gun was considered because of better armour piercing abilities. A. What was the name of this weapon? B. What was the starting caliber in mm and inches? C. What was the emerging caliber in mm and inches? D. What was the name of the principle involved in this weapon? E. What was Germany short of which made the production of this weapon prohibative? F. How many of these weapons were made? | |
| |
| | Post 1647 |
| Milforum Moderator ![]() | 1)sPzB 41 2)28mm or 1.102~ inches 3)20mm or 0.787~ inches 4) cone-bore principle 5)Tungstan, used for making the projectiles 6)2797 |
| |
| | Post 1648 |
| Primus Pilus | I've just come across an interesting fact. There was only one major incident involving chemical agents in the European theatre of WW2. Where did the attack come from that caused the incident, who held the stocks of gas, and who got gassed? This incident resulted in a greater number of deaths relative to those affected than the WW1 average.
__________________ Voice or no voice, the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is to tell them they are being attacked, and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same in any country. Herman Goering |
| |
| | Post 1649 |
| Milforum Moderator ![]() | German attack on the port city of Bari(spelling is probably not right). The port was filled with supply ships for the Allied forces in Italy. One of the American ships was carrying 100 tons of mustard gas. The ship was hit and the gas caused more than 1000 deaths to Allied troops and Italian civilians. |
| |
| | Post 1650 |
| Primus Pilus | Thought that would keep you all for a bit longer, well done Sherman. |
| |