Topic: Who would win the battle? 4

U.S. Cavalry

FAQ/Rules - Search - Military Photo Gallery

  International Military Forums > Military History Forums > Older and Ancient Military History
User Name
Password

View Poll Results :Who would win the pitched battle?
The Samurai 8 22.22%
The contemporary European soldier 15 41.67%
Depends on the terrain, weather and other circumstances 13 36.11%
Voters: 36. You may not vote on this poll

 
June 5th, 2006   Post 31
SNowblind
Immunes
 
Gear

I say the latter knights of the crusade or the knights templar could beat the samurai

1: superior armor
2: weapons you REALLY dont want to get hit by
3: physically stonger, and bigger
4: knights had horsies....wearing even more armor than the knights
 
June 24th, 2006   Post 32
LeEnfield
Tribuni Angusticlavii
 
 
Gear

I think many people are influenced about this by the films that they see where the warriors complete acts of total fantasy while fighting.
__________________
LeEnfield Rides again

 
June 25th, 2006   Post 33
MightyMacbeth
ICBM
 
 
Gear

Quote:
Originally Posted by SNowblind
I say the latter knights of the crusade or the knights templar could beat the samurai

1: superior armor
2: weapons you REALLY dont want to get hit by
3: physically stonger, and bigger
4: knights had horsies....wearing even more armor than the knights
ahh good points, but then see.

The samurai had armour to provide balance of light weight and protection. The knight had heavy and bulky armour.
Weapons, both sides had a variety of a fascinating arsenal.
Each sizes has its goods and bads. The smaller samurai will eventually have superior manauverabilty and speed.
The horses that samurai used where not as armoured as the knights one ofcourse. One had protection, while the other had agility. Both are good if u ask me
__________________
~when a man does his best, what else is there? Gen.George S.Patton

 
June 28th, 2006   Post 34
OORAH
Primus Pilus
 
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by SNowblind
I say the latter knights of the crusade or the knights templar could beat the samurai

1: superior armor
2: weapons you REALLY dont want to get hit by
3: physically stonger, and bigger
4: knights had horsies....wearing even more armor than the knights

weapons you REALLY dont want to get hit by..........i would definately not want to get hit by a katana.


physically stronger and bigger, in the martial arts, size and strength, although sometimes important, does not make a difference in most one on one fights. Individual skill and training, which the Japanese would have an upper hand on, would prevail.



I think the fight we're fantasizing about would be a good one, and it would be one hell of a fight to watch( i know i wouldn't wanna fight in it ), but i think overall the samurai would win. Superior training, weapons that were made with perfection in mind, and the mindset of the samurai would help them to overcome the Europeans
__________________
And shepards we shall be
For thee, My Lord, for thee
Power hath descended forth from thy hand
That our feet may quickly carry out thy command
So we shall flow a river forth to thee
And teeming with souls shall it ever be
In nomini Patri, et Fili, Spiritus Sancti

Veritas, Aequitas
 
August 9th, 2006   Post 35
Mohmar Deathstrike
Banned
 
 
Gear



Quote:
Originally Posted by Fox
I think that would be european soldiers. European soldiers have catapult, knights with chain of metals and metals. also their horses wear chain of metals, etc.
Nope. Contemporary European sodiers have assault rifles, hand grenades, grenade launchers, AT rockets, sniper rifles, submachine guns, machine guns etc...

So it would be a slaughter, not a battle.
 
August 9th, 2006   Post 36
Team Infidel
Milforum's Postmaster
 
 
Gear



It's all about the terrain.
__________________
 
August 14th, 2006   Post 37
AussieNick
Forum Digger
 
 
Gear

Quote:
weapons you REALLY dont want to get hit by
I don't want to get hit by any weapon. That should be a given.
__________________
Platoon Commander, 6 Platoon, B Company
10/27th Battalion
Royal South Australia Regiment

PRO PATRIA
 
May 16th, 2007   Post 38
Insomniac
Optio
 
 
Gear

Don't forget the mace: a crushing weapon that would bat aside any sword placed before it. The mace wielder would have probably battered a samurai to the floor through sheer force of attack. And the mattock. If i remember rightly, a mattock was basically a huge hammer with either a wooden or iron head. Think of someone wielding one of those coming screaming at you: you're certainly going to panic.
__________________
An appeaser is one who feeds a crocodile - hoping it will eat him last.
Sir Winston Churchill
 
May 21st, 2007   Post 39
mmarsh
Tribunus Laticlavius
 
Gear


I just cannot image how the Samurai would be able to stop a European heavy cavalry charge. The Samurai had imported Ponies from Korea, not European War Horses. And Unlike Hollywood, Most of the combat in Feudal Japan was fought on foot. A Frontal Charge by Veteran European Heavy cavalry formations would have been unfamiliar, terrifying, and unstoppable.

The Europeans only had 2 effective anti-heavy cavalry weapons: Pikes and Archery. Both of which relied on the other to be effective.

Pikes -The Samurai didn't have them. They did have spears, but not en-mass. Also I think the shaft on them would have been too short to prevent the cavalry from breaking through the lines.

Archery, The English/Welsh were the ones who pioneered arrowheads capable of penetrating plate (botkin arrowtip). I am not sure the Japanese arrowheads would penetrate the plate, let alone the chainmail shirt the Knights wore under their cuirass.

If it were Samurai vs Men at Arms I could see more of a match-up...
__________________
"My center is giving way, my right is in retreat; situation excellent. I shall attack." -Foch

I get this question a lot. I am from NYC. I fly a French flag because I work for the Paris Office of a International company.

Last edited by mmarsh : May 21st, 2007 at 04:46 PM.
 
August 22nd, 2007   Post 40
Norwegian Viking
Milites Gregarius
 
 
I think the samurais would have a big problem with Europe's technology