Topic: Worst Pices of Crap 3: Tanks 8

U.S. Cavalry

FAQ/Rules - Search - Military Photo Gallery

  International Military Forums > Military Discussion Forums > Military Hardware, Gear and Technology > Armored Military Vehicles Discussions
User Name
Password

 
March 6th, 2006   Post 71
LeEnfield
Tribunus Laticlavius
 
 
Gear

Heavy tanks, there were only a handful made before they brought the Centurion
__________________
LeEnfield Rides again

 
March 6th, 2006   Post 72
Doppleganger
Tribuni Angusticlavii
 
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by LeEnfield
icecold....Said
Conqueror (Heavy tank of the 60’s – so bad that Chieftain was a great improvement.)
Tortoise (80 ton monster that was too big and heavy for most bridges)

My you have been doing some reading, The British Conqueror never made it into service as it cancelled at the end of WW2 and only a few of these tanks still exist. The Tortoises was mainly designed to block bridges and control sections of the battlefield. You can still see this beastie in Bovington Tank Museum
The Conqueror was certainly not a bad tank, just that its intended role became obsolete with the advent of the Main Battle Tank concept. Futhermore, the 1st generation of post WW2 tanks definately had mobility as the most important factor from the 3 classic tenets of tank design, something that wasn't designed as being the Conqueror's strong point.
__________________
"An Emperor is subject to no-one but God and justice."

Frederick 1, Barbarossa
 
March 7th, 2006   Post 73
zander_0633
Milforum Gnat
 
 
Gear

Ok, so the Conqueror was slow, But did it compensate with good fire power?
__________________

- Ready To Strike -
 
March 7th, 2006   Post 74
LeEnfield
Tribunus Laticlavius
 
 
Gear

Zander..... there was only a limited number of the Conqueror tanks ever made, I don't think that they ever fired a shot in anger.

Last edited by LeEnfield; March 7th, 2006 at 19:14.
 
March 7th, 2006   Post 75
zander_0633
Milforum Gnat
 
 
Gear

oh! ok! so did they took part in any fighting?
 
March 7th, 2006   Post 76
LeEnfield
Tribunus Laticlavius
 
 
Gear

To answer your question Zander the answer is no, as the Centurion came out just afterwards and the British settled on this Tank as its main Battle Tank.
 
March 8th, 2006   Post 77
zander_0633
Milforum Gnat
 
 
Gear

Ok, So it actually was a tank that seen no action! weird!
 
March 8th, 2006   Post 78
Dean
Centurion
 
 
Gear

I was doing some thinking, (rare for me, but it does happen sometimes) and I realized that my personal worst tank of all time, the Sherman, actually outclassed its Japanese opposition. Could anyone enlighten me on the subject of Japanese WW 2 tanks and why they were so bad?

Dean.
 
March 9th, 2006   Post 79
zander_0633
Milforum Gnat
 
 
Gear

Wad ype of Japanese tanks, cause the Japanese did not use tanks in most warfare! I only remember them using the small three men tanks!
 
March 9th, 2006   Post 80
2dold4this
Immunes
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dean
I was doing some thinking, (rare for me, but it does happen sometimes) and I realized that my personal worst tank of all time, the Sherman, actually outclassed its Japanese opposition. Could anyone enlighten me on the subject of Japanese WW 2 tanks and why they were so bad?

Dean.

Interesting question.