| |
April 22nd, 2004
| Post 11 | |
| Tribuni Angusticlavii | Quote:
 | |
|
|
April 22nd, 2004
| Post 12 |
| Banned  | wow someone that actualy moderate. WOOHOO! |
|
|
|
April 25th, 2004
| Post 13 | ||
| Buttercup  | Quote:
Depends on how many you kill .
__________________ No boom, no boom, no boom, Amen. | ||
|
|
|
April 25th, 2004
| Post 14 | |||
| Tribuni Angusticlavii | Quote:
 | |||
|
|
|
April 25th, 2004
| Post 15 |
| Optio | i would have to say military strength cause were always going to war for peace but never happens  |
|
|
|
April 26th, 2004
| Post 16 |
| Optio | I agree to jamoni...... for something like peace you must give something to all countries that unites them..... and to future rangers scenario that wouldtnt work.....think of terrorists..... they also cant mess with a regular army, but nevertheless cause trouble as a equal opponent |
|
|
|
May 13th, 2004
| Post 17 |
| Banned | Theres never been world peace and until doomsday there never will be |
|
|
|
May 13th, 2004
| Post 18 |
| Tribuni Angusticlavii | The only time i have found that the conditions for world peace existed..was when Rome took over the known civilised world and put it under their rule. this came about through military action...ill say it would take military action today to get one top dog on top to state the rules. 
__________________ “If we should have to fight, we should be prepared to do so from the neck up instead of from the neck down.”— General James H. Doolittle, USAAF |
|
|
|
May 13th, 2004
| Post 19 |
| Tribuni Angusticlavii | A man kind isn't inteligent inuf to achive world peace  |
|
|
|
May 14th, 2004
| Post 20 |
| Milforum Hitman  | The international system is an anarchical system: each State can resort to force if it believes appropriate, without thus infringing any code or convention whatsoever. What some people want to purport ( right term? ) as the closest thing to an International Legal Order, ignore that there is no WORLD Constitution, nothing like common values such as those written on a nat'l constitution. On top of that, most of the countries in the UN are non democratic so force is permitted. Anyways I'd say half diplomacy and half strength in a general perspective: sumtimes 100 % diplomacy would be enough ( very seldom ), sum others 100 % would be ( less seldom, but seldom ). I vote for "others" option. Until a shared common values- int'l order is established ( resembling a private State constitution ) there will never be peace on earth.
__________________ "Freedom is the sure possession of those alone who have the courage to defend it". Pericles.  |
|
|
