Originally Posted by sharkwood

Those Nazis in German or japan did not represent justice.

something new :Japanese nazi's

I see that you are out of arguments,but not out of insults .

Originally Posted by lljadw

I see that you are out of arguments,but not out of insults .

I can keep this going for years if you so wish. I'm not out of arguments, I'm out of patience.

This is akin to trying to explain to a five year old why they shouldn't play with matches.

I thought you were older ;six maybe ?

Any chance we can move back to topic?

We have lasted 56 pages so far it would be a shame to screw it up now.

I couldn't agree more Monty.

Bloody twonks get my goat. Calms down to a mild panic.

Here's my point of view.
The Germans kicked to many asses and were very brutal in the occupied countries. Their supreme leader , Hitler, was a disaster in military warfare.
I don't know if Churchill new that Hitler would change plans in the Battle of Britain with that bombing raid in Berlin, but it surely saved the RAF. Hitler also changed plans when Moskow was within reach and lost his 6th Army in Stalingrad out of stubbornness. But he was also lucky, the bickering among the allied commanders prolonged the war unnecessary.

That's a lot of wrong things :
The LW never had a chance to win in the Battle of Britain.
There is no proof at all that the Germans could capture Moscow in 1941,and very unlikely that this would be decisive.
About Stalingrad :the truth is much more complicated.
About the bickering among the allied commanders :you could maybe give some explanations ?

Originally Posted by lljadw

About the bickering among the allied commanders :you could maybe give some explanations ?

There were bickering's between Monty and Patton, or rather Patton complained that Monty got the lions share of equipment and troops for Market Garden

These bickerings had no influence on the outcome of the war,because,it is not proved that,with more men,Patton could do better.On the other hand,while the execution of MG left much to be desired,the idea was not bad;whatever,MG resulted in the gaining of some terrain,with few losses.
The only chance the Allies had to force a decisive victory on the western front ,in the autumn of 1944,was, by starting a big offensive(some 50 divisions) on a small front,and this was logistically impossible;thus,the decision by Eisenhower to advance on a broad front was justifiable and defensible.