Topic: Why can't former Soviet states stay together as one country? 2

U.S. Cavalry

FAQ/Rules - Search - Military Photo Gallery

  International Military Forums > Military Discussion Forums > Political Discussions
User Name
Password

 
April 11th, 2005   Post 11
Italian Guy
Milforum Hitman
 
 
Gear

GodofThunder got the point there. Especially the Baltik states, Ukraine and Central Asian countries would gain nothing from joining up Russia.
__________________
"Freedom is the sure possession of those alone who have the courage to defend it".
Pericles.


 
April 11th, 2005   Post 12
CABAL
Primus Pilus
 
 
Gear

The former Soviet States cannot be joined together because of Political Polarity and in terms of economics, the Marginal Cost exceeds the Marginal Benefit, hence they see no need to re-unite.
__________________


Cogito ergo sum
 
April 12th, 2005   Post 13
Italian Guy
Milforum Hitman
 
 
Gear

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cabal
The former Soviet States cannot be joined together because of Political Polarity and in terms of economics, the Marginal Cost exceeds the Marginal Benefit, hence they see no need to re-unite.
Like Waltz or his buddies teach, uh?
 
April 13th, 2005   Post 14
daedalus
Milites Gregarius
 
 
you`d have to be inhabitant of one of these former countries to understand that... IMO nothing good has ever come to Estonia from Russia.. or can someone name anything
and in that union, where Russia undoubtly would be the leading country, you can`t talk about democracy..
and having a larger military.. again in my opinion it isn´t a way to measure the life standards in a country
 
April 16th, 2005   Post 15
Ezechiel
Optio
 

Post; Re: Why can't former Soviet states stay together as one coun


Quote:
Originally Posted by Red_Army
After the fall of the USSR in 1991, every Soviet state wanted independence.

My question is, why can't they stay together as one country? For example, "Republic of Soviet Union."

I think that if former Soviet states stayed together after the fall of communism, they could have a much larger military, a higher population, larger resources, and more GDP. All of this while in a Democratic system.
Never, because Racial conflict can causes many developement "blocktage" in Politics,economics and everything.

Even Russian can't govern their own people well (remember they have good resouces). You still expect a further Union of the eastern Europe?
 
April 16th, 2005   Post 16
Missileer
Nuclear Duck Hunter
 
 
Gear

If you were an independent country until Stalin, after which you became a number in a tax roll, would your now independent Government want to be a servant or served? Most of the countries which formed the USSR had longer histories as free states than Russia. And having your young people conscripted into every war the USSR decided was in it's interest does not make a strong military. It makes a fractionalized one at best.
__________________



“War is an ugly thing but not the ugliest of things; the decayed and degraded state of moral and patriotic feelings which thinks that nothing is worth war is much worse.”
—John Stuart Mill