Topic: What the US Should've Done...

Stripesgamer.com


Click Here to Join us Today!
FAQ/Rules - Search - Military Photo Gallery

  International Military Forums > Military Discussion Forums > Political Discussions
User Name
Password

 
August 5th, 2009   Post 1
Tovarish1
Optio
 
 
Gear


Post; What the US Should've Done...


I know this is a little bit old but I'm just gonna say it anyway because it seemed like a good idea then and now (even though now it's too late because it's over.) Iraq...USA...what do they have in common??? Well they're both enemies with Iran! So US should've collaborated with Saddam, then the US and Saddam should've went over to Iran, taught them a lesson, and when the lesson was over, we should've turned our backs on Saddam. I wanna know what you people think about that idea, again, even though it's years late ........
__________________
What's life without a little RISK!?!?!
-Joe Bourke & Dan Spevak (This signature is copywrited you heathens!)
 
August 5th, 2009   Post 2
The Other Guy
Spam King
 
 
Gear


We fooled around with this idea for years, and I believe we may have even sent weapons to Iraq during the Iran-Iraq war (though we were privately funding Iran to get our hostages released) but we never planned full scale attacks.
__________________
Democracy can not be installed by a foreign country; the people must do it themselves.
Free Iran! Half off Iraq, Buy one get one free Kuwait...
 
August 5th, 2009   Post 3
Tovarish1
Optio
 
 
Gear


God... President Carter should have sent a conventional fighting force to Iran to get those hostages out. If it weren't for Carter, we'd still have great relations with Iran... Here's one thing that makes a good president... DON'T BE A PACIFIST. So why couldn't that idea have worked?
 
August 6th, 2009   Post 4
the_13th_redneck
Je suis aware
 
 
Gear

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tovarish1
God... President Carter should have sent a conventional fighting force to Iran to get those hostages out. If it weren't for Carter, we'd still have great relations with Iran... Here's one thing that makes a good president... DON'T BE A PACIFIST. So why couldn't that idea have worked?
A conventional army to get the hostages out? You mean launch a full scale invasion and take apart Iran and hope by the time troops got to Tehran there was actually something left of the hostages?
__________________

I sold my soul to the devil, and the price was cheap.
 
August 6th, 2009   Post 5
rustybolt25
Milites Gregarius
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tovarish1
God... President Carter should have sent a conventional fighting force to Iran to get those hostages out. If it weren't for Carter, we'd still have great relations with Iran... Here's one thing that makes a good president... DON'T BE A PACIFIST. So why couldn't that idea have worked?


A full scale army? Wouldn't the Iranians be covering the US with love now!
 
August 6th, 2009   Post 6
Tovarish1
Optio
 
 
Gear


Well yeah I left out a detail. Maybe Green Berets to rescue hostages maybe DEVGRU, but while the hostages are being rescued yeah, sure, launch an invasion of unconventional Marines and Soldiers.
 
August 6th, 2009   Post 7
Chukpike
Primus Pilus
 
 
Gear

Actually the did launch a rescue mission but it failed to reach the embassy where the hostages were being held.
 
August 6th, 2009   Post 8
the_13th_redneck
Je suis aware
 
 
Gear

Read up:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Eagle_Claw

Look up Desert One as that was the code name of the refeulling point they set up in Iran. It's where things went irreversably south.
 
August 6th, 2009   Post 9
Tovarish1
Optio
 
 
Gear


Yeah... Carter was definitely a pacifist when it came to that ordeal.
 
August 6th, 2009   Post 10
the_13th_redneck
Je suis aware
 
 
Gear

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tovarish1
Yeah... Carter was definitely a pacifist when it came to that ordeal.
Did you even read about what happened?
 



Similar Threads
McCain: Bush should've urged enlistment (AP)
if ur late to ur final exam
Do you think Micheal Jackson should've been found guilty?