| |
October 5th, 2004
| Post 11 |
| No Chance Outside | It's got to be a lousy job. Apparently the chances of getting out of 2 years of mine disarming without getting mangled is about 50/50. It's one of things I'd never do. Ugh.  Better to just explode them from a distance.
__________________ I don't exist.  TRESPASSERS WILL BE PROSTITUTED  Next time you travel http://www.epictrip.com |
|
|
October 5th, 2004
| Post 12 |
| Primus Pilus | I dont know if i could do it, as if a bomb goes off your going to lose your hands, and personally i would probably prefer to lose my legs or eyes rather than lose both hands. |
|
|
|
October 5th, 2004
| Post 13 | |
| Centurion | Quote:
I'd rather just have one of these babys do it. Better then losing a man, aye? http://www.army-technology.com/contr...mines/i_robot/ | |
|
|
|
October 5th, 2004
| Post 14 |
| Primus Pilus | very true! |
|
|
|
October 5th, 2004
| Post 15 |
| Tribuni Angusticlavii | The RCMP issue class 3 flak vests are pretty good.
__________________ WO2 Trevor Perry, Squadron Deputy Commander 746 Lightning Hawk RCACS |
|
|
|
October 6th, 2004
| Post 16 |
| Tribunus Laticlavius  | My vote goes for this one:  Kidding of course. 
__________________ "It is well that war is so terrible, else we should grow too fond of it." - General Robert E. Lee Warning, critical pebkac error in the iD10t!! pebkac\wtflolurpwnzd\snafuroflmao.exe called iD10t, iD10t failed to respond!! System in danger!! "It takes a big man to admit when he's wrong. I am NOT a big man." -Chevy Chase |
|
|
|
October 6th, 2004
| Post 17 |
| Centurion | I think God is on to somthing. I'm betting those laser weapons are useless on it! The armor of the future is the armor of the past.  |
|
|
|
October 6th, 2004
| Post 18 | |
| Banned  | Quote:
Laser weapon, with enough power can simply make hole thougth iron (cause the laser will fuse it), rather than like bullet being stopped. | |
|
|
|
October 6th, 2004
| Post 19 |
| Optio | I have an Interceptor bullet proof vest with level IIII ceramic plates. Which one is best really depends on the use. For combat where you face rifle rounds ie 7.62 from AK's you need to have good coverage and level IIII protection without losing to much mobility. The interceptor is light comfortable as it can be and provides level IIII protection of the majority of your back and chest, the rest of your upper torso to include your neck and groin area. It doesn't weigh too much and you keep the majority of your mobility. Until something else comes out that is better this will stay as my choice.
__________________ "You don't hurt 'em if you don't hit 'em." - Lieutenant-General Lewis B. "Chesty" Puller |
|
|
|
October 6th, 2004
| Post 20 | ||
| Centurion | Quote:
I know.  Was just kidding. | ||
|
|
