Topic: Wesly Clark For President 2004 2

GuyontheRight · November 5th, 2003

With all dou respect Shobah, if Clarke had run the war on terror he would of exhausted all are cruise missle arsenal preping Afgahnistan for invasion, bombed every last remote villige he could find, and when half the population was dead he would finally insert ground troops, while bin Laden had hobbled his way clear into Iran.

Shobah · November 6th, 2003

didnt osamma run to Iran any ways?

GuyontheRight · November 6th, 2003

That or Pakistan, the point being Clarke would have run a potracted bombing and land campaign that wouldn't have been as effective or casualty-free as the SF plan Rumsfeld had laid out.

Shobah · November 6th, 2003

what makes you think that Clark would have not made a qick attack? what makes you think that he would do a worse job them Pres. Bush and the team?

why are we even having this thread as long as your converitive and im liberal we wont agree because we dont feel the same on these things nothing you say will change my mind and nothing i say will change yours

GuyontheRight · November 6th, 2003

It has nothing to do with politics, to think so is sterotypical and ludicris. You musn't be so familier with Clarke's record. In the Balkans it he nearly depeleted US smart weapos assets by waging a 90 day war only by air, in which a number of objectives wern't met, and atocities were still being commited. He is highly conventional, unlike Bush and Rumsfeld who vied against Tommy Franks in using Conventional forces to take down the Taliban. In the war on terror, conventional forces just won't cut it, and as good as a stratigest Clarke may be, I highly doubt he would of dealt with Afgahnistan as efficiently as the Bush team.

Im not nearly as conservative as most people think btw, I opposed the war in Iraq. As far as Im concerned this discussion is not of politics, but of the carrer of Wesly Clarke.

diplomatic_means · December 7th, 2003

All I know is Clark doesn't stand a chance. The Dems are running a bigger circus than California. They have like twelve different candidates and the support for each one is fairly evenly spread. If any one of the candidates are given the official spot there will be many other democrats that dislike the candidate enough to vote Bush. Bush will win this election by a landslide.

GuyontheRight · December 7th, 2003

I know who Im voting for.

Forgot I cant vote yet

Redleg · December 9th, 2003

Quote:

Originally Posted by GuyontheRight

I know who Im voting for.

Arnie??

GuyontheRight · December 9th, 2003

George W Bush

Airborne · October 11th, 2004

Ya, ummm, I don't think Clarke is going to make it.

November 5th, 2003	Post 11
GuyontheRight Tribuni Angusticlavii	With all dou respect Shobah, if Clarke had run the war on terror he would of exhausted all are cruise missle arsenal preping Afgahnistan for invasion, bombed every last remote villige he could find, and when half the population was dead he would finally insert ground troops, while bin Laden had hobbled his way clear into Iran. __________________ No Voice

November 6th, 2003	Post 12
Shobah Milites Gregarius	didnt osamma run to Iran any ways?

November 6th, 2003	Post 13
GuyontheRight Tribuni Angusticlavii	That or Pakistan, the point being Clarke would have run a potracted bombing and land campaign that wouldn't have been as effective or casualty-free as the SF plan Rumsfeld had laid out.

November 6th, 2003	Post 14
Shobah Milites Gregarius	what makes you think that Clark would have not made a qick attack? what makes you think that he would do a worse job them Pres. Bush and the team? why are we even having this thread as long as your converitive and im liberal we wont agree because we dont feel the same on these things nothing you say will change my mind and nothing i say will change yours

November 6th, 2003	Post 15
GuyontheRight Tribuni Angusticlavii	It has nothing to do with politics, to think so is sterotypical and ludicris. You musn't be so familier with Clarke's record. In the Balkans it he nearly depeleted US smart weapos assets by waging a 90 day war only by air, in which a number of objectives wern't met, and atocities were still being commited. He is highly conventional, unlike Bush and Rumsfeld who vied against Tommy Franks in using Conventional forces to take down the Taliban. In the war on terror, conventional forces just won't cut it, and as good as a stratigest Clarke may be, I highly doubt he would of dealt with Afgahnistan as efficiently as the Bush team. Im not nearly as conservative as most people think btw, I opposed the war in Iraq. As far as Im concerned this discussion is not of politics, but of the carrer of Wesly Clarke.

December 7th, 2003	Post 16
diplomatic_means Centurion	All I know is Clark doesn't stand a chance. The Dems are running a bigger circus than California. They have like twelve different candidates and the support for each one is fairly evenly spread. If any one of the candidates are given the official spot there will be many other democrats that dislike the candidate enough to vote Bush. Bush will win this election by a landslide.

December 7th, 2003	Post 17
GuyontheRight Tribuni Angusticlavii	I know who Im voting for. Forgot I cant vote yet

December 9th, 2003	Post 19
GuyontheRight Tribuni Angusticlavii	George W Bush

October 11th, 2004	Post 20
Airborne Optio	Ya, ummm, I don't think Clarke is going to make it.