| |
| | Post 1 |
| Optio | Post; Were Draft Dodgers Cowards?The question is: Were the people who fled to Canada and other points to avoid service in the Vietnam War Cowards? As far as I see it, this is one of those topics that people try to make more complex than it really is. Granted its a pretty personal decision, made at a time that at least to these folks was pretty intense, but where the rubber meets the road the choice's are actually pretty clear. Your decision is either based on fear: "I don't want to maybe die", or it's based on conviction: "I don't agree with what's going on, and I'm not going to take part in it". My 2 cents: I respect those that stood by their conviction, and paid the price (Mohammed Ali is an example). I don't agree with them, but I can respect them to a point. Anyone who ran, as far as I'm concerned was a coward, and should have never been granted amnesty, nor let back into the country they abandonded the second it was going to cost them something. The only "conviction" this group stood for concerned the yellow stripe running down their backs. Enough for now. |
| |
| | Post 2 |
| Milforum's Bouncer | In my judgement the ones who ran were the more economically challenged cowards as the ones who were better off had positions in NG units that were sure not to be activated secured for them.
__________________ "The purpose of fighting is to win. There is no possible victory in defense. The sword is more important than the shield and skill is more important than either. The final weapon is the brain. All else is supplemental." - John Steinbeck |
| |
| | Post 3 | |
| Nuclear Duck Hunter ![]() | Quote:
__________________ “War is an ugly thing but not the ugliest of things; the decayed and degraded state of moral and patriotic feelings which thinks that nothing is worth war is much worse.” —John Stuart Mill | |
| |
| | Post 4 | |
| Tribunus Laticlavius | I dunno, alot of good people make bad choices. Like Missileer said, they now have to live with it. I doubt many go bragging about how they fled from the draft (for whatever reason).
__________________ Quote:
| |
| |
| | Post 5 |
| Tribunus Laticlavius | Well as they don't want to support their country why not just disown them, remove their right to live in the US and also take away their passport.
__________________ LeEnfield Rides again |
| |
| | Post 6 | |
| Tribunus Laticlavius | Quote:
| |
| |
| | Post 7 |
| Tribunus Laticlavius | I definitely would've been one of the guys who ran on his convictions... But I'm sure there were a lot of cowards too. If there was a direct threat to America, then I'd go, but I wouldn't go to stop the spread of communism in some southeast asian hellhole... World War 2, Korea, sure... But not in a civil war where both sides are shooting at you.
__________________ "It will be found an unjust and unwise jealousy to deprive a man of his natural liberty upon the supposition he may abuse it." - George Washington Last edited by major liability; February 16th, 2006 at 21:24. |
| |
| | Post 8 | |
| Milites Gregarius | Quote:
| |
| |
| | Post 9 | |
| Banned ![]() | Quote:
| |
| |
| | Post 10 |
| Tribunus Laticlavius | I reckon that it is far fetched to strip them of their nationality because they don't want to fight their government's war! Personally I think I would have gone, but I'll never know for sure. But the older I get them more I understand the nay-sayers. It has to be pretty damn personal for me to step up and go to war! In a war of such dubious nature one should have to right to say "no". Or the government should have made it a volunteers-only war. But to draft people and not give them a choice in a war that is not really worth dying for..... hell, it a tough call. To most defensive wars I'd go, but this specific one.... I guess I'll never know and thank God I am not in the situation that I have to choose!
__________________ A fanatic is one who can't change his mind and won't change the subject. Sir Winston Churchill |
| |