Topic: Wars going Nuclear 4

MadeInChina · February 7th, 2005

deaths over years of war and attrition as well as famine due to war in the millions are likely to be ignored, the thing is when large number of deaths occur in a short period of time is the attentiong grabber

the atomic bomb is not worse than the japanese onslaught

however, we wont like that any more than future wars

the face of war has been changed by the use of machines and atomic bombs, the latter very big.

lets hope no abomb explodes in the future, as we know its powers when inthe hands of the wrong people, like terrorists and iran and NK

MadeInChina · February 7th, 2005

lemme correct that, wrong people as in wrong leaders and countries likely to use nuclear

Sexybeast · February 9th, 2005

before we hope that no one will ever use Nukes again, we should PRAY that no one will start the WW2 like **** again and force ppl to throw nukes at them

MadeInChina · February 9th, 2005

yes, even i felt sry for the japs in hiroshima, even though their deaths was much lower than compared

anyhow, it just shows the power of a single bomb to destory a city, but well enough to have a image in military minds about bigger, more powerful bombs in the future.

mcarthurs willingness to nuke china was how close a second nuclear disaster will occur

same with the cuba crisis

and now we have the korean crisis, hope it will be solved as usual

Sexybeast · February 9th, 2005

i doubt Kim will really use nukes at anyone unless that is his last resort..

i believe that he wants to continue his life and also his ppl's lives

wut is reallly disturbing is Isreal's nukes...

it is rumoured that Isreal has more than 400 nuke warheads, and preparing to use them when Isreal is in danger of being overan by Arabian nations

Missileer · February 23rd, 2005

I guess all I can say is, don't try to overrun them.

Whispering Death · February 24th, 2005

Quote:

Originally Posted by the_13th_redneck

People might criticse America for being in the wrong even if they're right, but if you ACTUALLY do wrong, then imagine how bad it could get? You still have to act on principle, regardless of what others think.
No Nukes.

Yeah, they all seemed to think going into Iraq was a pretty bad idea, I wonder how that turned out for them?

The truth is that republicans don't really give 2 shits about what the rest of the world thinks and if they tell you they do it's only because they want something out of your country. But you guys can pretty much make a democrat do anything you want because they're spineless when it comes to foreign policy.

Was that inflamatory about democrats? Well just compare Clinton and Carter to Regan and Bush.

C/Cpl. Chirico · February 24th, 2005

interesting fact that the US has enough nukes in its arsenal to destroy the world 8 times over.

Sexybeast · February 25th, 2005

and i hope that in my life time no one will use nukes,

cuz once ppl start to use it, no one knows when ppl can stop using it without getting our poor little planet into a nuke winter

February 7th, 2005	Post 31
MadeInChina Primus Pilus	deaths over years of war and attrition as well as famine due to war in the millions are likely to be ignored, the thing is when large number of deaths occur in a short period of time is the attentiong grabber the atomic bomb is not worse than the japanese onslaught however, we wont like that any more than future wars the face of war has been changed by the use of machines and atomic bombs, the latter very big. lets hope no abomb explodes in the future, as we know its powers when inthe hands of the wrong people, like terrorists and iran and NK __________________ A signature is a little text that can be added at the bottom of the posts you make. It\'s limited to 300 characters (size 7 to 12) on 5 line(s) and 1 image(s) with none larger than 100x500 pixels and for a maximum of 20Kb. In your text, no more than 100 characters without space too.

February 23rd, 2005	Post 36
Missileer Nuclear Duck Hunter Gear	I guess all I can say is, don't try to overrun them. __________________ “War is an ugly thing but not the ugliest of things; the decayed and degraded state of moral and patriotic feelings which thinks that nothing is worth war is much worse.” —John Stuart Mill

February 24th, 2005	Post 38
C/Cpl. Chirico Milites Gregarius	interesting fact that the US has enough nukes in its arsenal to destroy the world 8 times over. __________________ -Semper Fi

February 7th, 2005	Post 32
MadeInChina Primus Pilus	lemme correct that, wrong people as in wrong leaders and countries likely to use nuclear

February 9th, 2005	Post 33
Sexybeast Banned	before we hope that no one will ever use Nukes again, we should PRAY that no one will start the WW2 like **** again and force ppl to throw nukes at them

February 9th, 2005	Post 34
MadeInChina Primus Pilus	yes, even i felt sry for the japs in hiroshima, even though their deaths was much lower than compared anyhow, it just shows the power of a single bomb to destory a city, but well enough to have a image in military minds about bigger, more powerful bombs in the future. mcarthurs willingness to nuke china was how close a second nuclear disaster will occur same with the cuba crisis and now we have the korean crisis, hope it will be solved as usual

February 9th, 2005	Post 35
Sexybeast Banned	i doubt Kim will really use nukes at anyone unless that is his last resort.. i believe that he wants to continue his life and also his ppl's lives wut is reallly disturbing is Isreal's nukes... it is rumoured that Isreal has more than 400 nuke warheads, and preparing to use them when Isreal is in danger of being overan by Arabian nations

February 25th, 2005	Post 39
Sexybeast Banned	and i hope that in my life time no one will use nukes, cuz once ppl start to use it, no one knows when ppl can stop using it without getting our poor little planet into a nuke winter