Topic: Vietnam War, lost or not. 8

U.S. Cavalry

FAQ/Rules - Search - Military Photo Gallery

  International Military Forums > Military History Forums > Modern Military History
User Name
Password

View Poll Results :Please pick one of the two options.
The US militarily lost the Vietnam War. 36 46.75%
The US withdrew only due to the homefront protests, but they it never lost on the military level 41 53.25%
Voters: 77. You may not vote on this poll

 
January 2nd, 2006   Post 71
godofthunder9010
Tribunus Laticlavius
 
 
Gear

Quote:
Originally Posted by DTop
That wasn't exactly how it happened. Khe San was an attempt by the NVA (not the VC) to do to the US what they did to France at Dien Bien Phu. The siege of the firebase started in January 1968 and lasted until April of the same year. 5 regiments (~5,000) of US Marines repelled repeated attempts to overrun the base by 20,000 to 40,000 NVA.
Once the weather cleared, US air power was brought to bear and in April 6th, the base was reinforced by US Army (2nd Cav). Two days later the 2/7 Cav linked up with the 26th Marines to officially relieve the base. The NVA was forced to withdraw and give up the notion of taking the base.
The base was indeed abandoned but it was in June of '68 and because the base had no further military value to the US and there was nobody left to "march in unopposed". It's amazing how the facts can get twisted and tweaked over time.
It's also interesting to note that nearly a quarter of all television news was devoted to covering the battle, and was even higher for some. For example, CBS devoted half of their news shows to the siege. The intensely televised coverage was one of the hallmarks of Vietnam conflict in general.
Just thought I'd interject some facts about Khe Sahn at this point in the discussion.
Yet another case where the NVA played a very big part in the Vietnam War. The ridiculous and silly thing of it all was that the USA was not allowed to respond with a full counterattack against North Vietnam. The machine that drove the Vietnam War against us was sitting in Hanoi and we kept ourselves well clear of it (cept boming it of course). We were a giant and powerful military machine with its arms tied behind its back, but kickin butt regardless. But you can't win a war that way.

The really amusing thing is how greatly people tend to underestimate the NVA role in the war. As stated before, without the NVA resupplying and smuggling in NVA regulars into South Vietnam, the Vietcong woulda been pretty close to finished, especially after the Tet Offensive.
__________________
"It is well that war is so terrible, else we should grow too fond of it."
- General Robert E. Lee
Warning, critical pebkac error in the iD10t!! pebkac\wtflolurpwnzd\snafuroflmao.exe called iD10t, iD10t failed to respond!! System in danger!!

"It takes a big man to admit when he's wrong. I am NOT a big man." -Chevy Chase
 
January 3rd, 2006   Post 72
DTop
Milforum Moderator
 
 
Gear

Actually, if the NVA wasn't involved then the whole purpose of the American invlovement wouldn't have existed, at least in my opinion. That is to say that if the VC were the only force fighting the South Vietnamese, then there would have been no question about the conflict being solely an internal (civil) war. But because the North chose to support the VC and to invade the South with their own troops, coupled with the fact that the USSR and China chose to support, supply, and advise the North, the conflict became a war of proxy for these bigger powers.
In those days, the American government's concern about increased communist expansion in the world (the famous Domino effect) was the reason for US involvement in the Vietnam conflict in the first place.
You have to place yourself in this time and the prevalent mindset that existed. The Domino Effect stemmed from the policy of containment established by President Truman as his foreign policy doctrine. It was based on several premises:
1. The USSR was always fanatically expansionist and determined to control the world.
2. Any new communist government would inevitably end up as part of the USSR.
3. Communism and the USSR must be contained by any means short of all out war.
The last premise is key in understanding why the US never decided to invade the North or to even officially declare war. It was believed that either act would have brought the same response from the USSR.
__________________
"I was a soldier, I am a soldier, I always will be a soldier."

To Avoid Infractions - Click Here And Read the Forum Rules Before You Post.
 
January 4th, 2006   Post 73
Whispering Death
Tribuni Angusticlavii
 
 
Gear

Yeah, look, you can try and dance around it however you want. And if you are a Vietnam veteran I can definately see how you wouldn't want to admit it.

But all that blood and treasure we spent was for a lost war. We had the war 75% won but the American public decided to cut and run... so we did when we had the majority of the war won.

It may have been one of the worst strategic decisions in American millitary history but just because it's stupid doesn't mean we didn't lose. America gave into left-wing propoganda and deciet and we retreated back accross the ocean and let South Vietnam die.

Last edited by Whispering Death; January 4th, 2006 at 11:14.
 
January 4th, 2006   Post 74
bulldogg
Milforum's Bouncer
 
 
Gear


Quote:
Originally Posted by Whispering Death
Yeah, look, you can try and dance around it however you want. And if you are a Vietnam veteran I can definately see how you wouldn't want to admit it.
That ^^^ is one ballsy statement and a clear testament to the sense of security and authority sitting behind a monitor with a keyboard can bestow upon a person.

I daresay it is a statement I would love to see you make to any Vietnam Vet face to face. Just let me know when and where you do it so I can get a good seat.
__________________
"The purpose of fighting is to win. There is no possible victory in defense. The sword is more important than the shield and skill is more important than either. The final weapon is the brain. All else is supplemental." - John Steinbeck
 
January 4th, 2006   Post 75
zander_0633
Milforum Gnat
 
 
Gear

Well, How come the US had to retreat, I thought the Vietcons forced the US troops into street battles?
 
January 4th, 2006   Post 76
Whispering Death
Tribuni Angusticlavii
 
 
Gear

Quote:
Originally Posted by bulldogg
That ^^^ is one ballsy statement and a clear testament to the sense of security and authority sitting behind a monitor with a keyboard can bestow upon a person.

I daresay it is a statement I would love to see you make to any Vietnam Vet face to face. Just let me know when and where you do it so I can get a good seat.
You're supposed to be a teacher right bulldogg? Then where's the logic in that? Just because it might anger some veterans means that we didn't lose Vietnam? Feelings > Facts?

I'd love to say that the Vietnam war ended when S.Vietnam became the fastest growing capitalist economy in the world and China disentigrated into civil war with the liberal democratic army leading the reunification and becomming America's second best ally in the world... right behind South Vietnam as America's biggest ally.

But that's not the way it played out. The Vietnam war ended with American soldiers fighting grueling smashmouth football and standing on the enemy's 20 yard line. In the red zone, within striking distance of the goal in the year 1970. But we live in a democracy, and the liberal lies convinced America to throw in the towel. They said enough is enough, we can't have our boys getting banged up anymore in this grueling fight. So the liberal American people gave up the war, forced the politicians to gave up the cause, and ordered the army to retreat back across the ocean.

As a soldier all you can do is follow orders, and the naive liberal mindset gave our servicemen no other choice but the order to give it up and go home.

Last edited by Whispering Death; January 4th, 2006 at 14:49.
 
January 4th, 2006   Post 77
bulldogg
Milforum's Bouncer
 
 
Gear


No, it was the irreverance of the remark that drew my comment. The way you began that post was very condescending and cheeky as hell bruv. But like I said, by all means say that to a Vietnam vet, just let me know when and where I always enjoy watching someone being "educated".
 
January 4th, 2006   Post 78
Whispering Death
Tribuni Angusticlavii
 
 
Gear

Quote:
Originally Posted by zander_0633
Well, How come the US had to retreat, I thought the Vietcons forced the US troops into street battles?
So what? Just because we killed them in streets instead of rice fields? It doesn't matter where we killed the enemy, we killed them in huge numbers and absolutely decimated them in every single battle of the war. Every time the vietcong came to fight they where destroyed. That, combined with the "hearts and minds" program where we gave food and economic aid to villiages who helped us stopped the insurgentcy after a few years and convinced the South Vietnamese that this was their destiny.

Of course this never penetrated the liberal media. Instead it was just bad news every night and liberal propoganda on the airwaves. In the end the American people forced all our brave servicemen to leave the job unfinished and the underprepared South Vietnamese helpless against all the weight of the communist countries' alliance.
 
January 4th, 2006   Post 79
Whispering Death
Tribuni Angusticlavii
 
 
Gear

Quote:
Originally Posted by bulldogg
But like I said, by all means say that to a Vietnam vet, just let me know when and where I always enjoy watching someone being "educated".
I'm not sure I'd take any pleasure from "educating" a Vietnam vet. What the American people did to those guys from sending them to fight a war halfway around the world to forcing them to stop right when they where winning to spitting on them when they came back... it sickens me, but it's the truth. But maybe if this current generation learns the truth of Vietnam they wouldn't be so quick to try and pull the same s*** with our boys currently in Iraq?
 
January 4th, 2006   Post 80
bulldogg
Milforum's Bouncer
 
 
Gear


I daresay the person being "educated" would be you.