| |
Topic: Vietnam War, lost or not. 8 |
![]() |
|
| View Poll Results :Please pick one of the two options. | |||
| The US militarily lost the Vietnam War. | | 36 | 46.75% |
| The US withdrew only due to the homefront protests, but they it never lost on the military level | | 41 | 53.25% |
| Voters: 77. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
| |
| | Post 71 | |
| Tribunus Laticlavius | Quote:
The really amusing thing is how greatly people tend to underestimate the NVA role in the war. As stated before, without the NVA resupplying and smuggling in NVA regulars into South Vietnam, the Vietcong woulda been pretty close to finished, especially after the Tet Offensive.
__________________ "It is well that war is so terrible, else we should grow too fond of it." - General Robert E. Lee Warning, critical pebkac error in the iD10t!! pebkac\wtflolurpwnzd\snafuroflmao.exe called iD10t, iD10t failed to respond!! System in danger!! "It takes a big man to admit when he's wrong. I am NOT a big man." -Chevy Chase | |
| |
| | Post 72 |
| Milforum Moderator ![]() | Actually, if the NVA wasn't involved then the whole purpose of the American invlovement wouldn't have existed, at least in my opinion. That is to say that if the VC were the only force fighting the South Vietnamese, then there would have been no question about the conflict being solely an internal (civil) war. But because the North chose to support the VC and to invade the South with their own troops, coupled with the fact that the USSR and China chose to support, supply, and advise the North, the conflict became a war of proxy for these bigger powers. In those days, the American government's concern about increased communist expansion in the world (the famous Domino effect) was the reason for US involvement in the Vietnam conflict in the first place. You have to place yourself in this time and the prevalent mindset that existed. The Domino Effect stemmed from the policy of containment established by President Truman as his foreign policy doctrine. It was based on several premises: 1. The USSR was always fanatically expansionist and determined to control the world. 2. Any new communist government would inevitably end up as part of the USSR. 3. Communism and the USSR must be contained by any means short of all out war. The last premise is key in understanding why the US never decided to invade the North or to even officially declare war. It was believed that either act would have brought the same response from the USSR.
__________________ "I was a soldier, I am a soldier, I always will be a soldier." To Avoid Infractions - Click Here And Read the Forum Rules Before You Post. |
| |
| | Post 73 |
| Tribuni Angusticlavii | Yeah, look, you can try and dance around it however you want. And if you are a Vietnam veteran I can definately see how you wouldn't want to admit it. But all that blood and treasure we spent was for a lost war. We had the war 75% won but the American public decided to cut and run... so we did when we had the majority of the war won. It may have been one of the worst strategic decisions in American millitary history but just because it's stupid doesn't mean we didn't lose. America gave into left-wing propoganda and deciet and we retreated back accross the ocean and let South Vietnam die. Last edited by Whispering Death; January 4th, 2006 at 11:14. |
| |
| | Post 74 | |
| Milforum's Bouncer | Quote:
I daresay it is a statement I would love to see you make to any Vietnam Vet face to face. Just let me know when and where you do it so I can get a good seat.
__________________ "The purpose of fighting is to win. There is no possible victory in defense. The sword is more important than the shield and skill is more important than either. The final weapon is the brain. All else is supplemental." - John Steinbeck | |
| |
| | Post 75 |
| Milforum Gnat | Well, How come the US had to retreat, I thought the Vietcons forced the US troops into street battles? |
| |
| | Post 76 | |
| Tribuni Angusticlavii | Quote:
I'd love to say that the Vietnam war ended when S.Vietnam became the fastest growing capitalist economy in the world and China disentigrated into civil war with the liberal democratic army leading the reunification and becomming America's second best ally in the world... right behind South Vietnam as America's biggest ally. But that's not the way it played out. The Vietnam war ended with American soldiers fighting grueling smashmouth football and standing on the enemy's 20 yard line. In the red zone, within striking distance of the goal in the year 1970. But we live in a democracy, and the liberal lies convinced America to throw in the towel. They said enough is enough, we can't have our boys getting banged up anymore in this grueling fight. So the liberal American people gave up the war, forced the politicians to gave up the cause, and ordered the army to retreat back across the ocean. As a soldier all you can do is follow orders, and the naive liberal mindset gave our servicemen no other choice but the order to give it up and go home. Last edited by Whispering Death; January 4th, 2006 at 14:49. | |
| |
| | Post 77 |
| Milforum's Bouncer | No, it was the irreverance of the remark that drew my comment. The way you began that post was very condescending and cheeky as hell bruv. But like I said, by all means say that to a Vietnam vet, just let me know when and where I always enjoy watching someone being "educated". |
| |
| | Post 78 | |
| Tribuni Angusticlavii | Quote:
Of course this never penetrated the liberal media. Instead it was just bad news every night and liberal propoganda on the airwaves. In the end the American people forced all our brave servicemen to leave the job unfinished and the underprepared South Vietnamese helpless against all the weight of the communist countries' alliance. | |
| |
| | Post 79 | |
| Tribuni Angusticlavii | Quote:
| |
| |
| | Post 80 |
| Milforum's Bouncer | I daresay the person being "educated" would be you. |
| |