![]() | About Vacuum Bomb |
![]() |
| | #1 |
| | Vacuum Bomb infoAs you know, in 2007 Russia tested the world's most powerful vacuum bomb, more powerful than American MOAB (first tested in 2003). According to: http://operkor.wordpress.com/2011/03...%D0%B0-%D1%80/ that this weapon has now been officially delivered to Russia's military. A vacuum bomb, as I understand it, works like a nuclear bomb, but leaves no radiation behind. Who here think this is the future, that, eventually, these will completely replace nuclear weapons? |
![]() | |
| |
| | #2 |
| |
Personally I don't think anything will ever substitue the fear brought upon people in the way nuclear weapons does. You just take a look at the footage from Hiroshima and Nagasaki, a test of any other kind of bomb can't even nearly match that anyway. |
| | #3 |
| |
Nope, just search for the "Tsar Bomba". Wikipedia provides pretty good information. The Tsar Bomba literally make the Hiroshima and Nagasaki bombs look like fireworks....
|
| | #4 | |
| | Quote:
The pictures and description of the utter misery and devastation in Hiroshima and Nagasaki is forever burned into the minds of human beings as symbols of ultimate human made destructive devices. Hence, nuclear bombs will be the # 1. fear also in the years to come. Even in the Soviet Union, the word "Hiroshima" was used to describe the utter nuclear cathastrophy scenario, even though the letter "H" doesn't exist in the Russian Cyrillian alphabet... | |
| | #5 |
| |
That's what keeping the peace: nuclear weapons. The nightmare will never be forgotten, and nobody, not even Kim-Jong-Il or Mahmoud Ahmadinejad wants it
|
| | #7 | ||
| | Quote:
Quote:
Yes, a nuclear bomb can kill 10,000 people at once but I donīt die 10,000 times more because it's a nuke. And it is "just a bomb, itīs the shock wave, as in all other bombs you are exploiting. Moreover, I donīt believe that the risk of a nuclear war is particularly high. And should it happen thatīs it. I donīt fear nuclear bombs - and thatīs not a lie. | ||
| | #8 | |
| | Quote:
| |
| | #9 |
| |
Personally, if faced with biological or nuclear (or hydrogen) weapons, then I prefer the nuclear (and hydrogen) weapons. If I was nuked, then it would be over in a second (unless I only was injured, then the pain would be awful |
![]() |