| |
Topic: V-22 Debate Continues Despite Deployment Decision 2 |
![]() |
|
![]() |
| |
| | Post 11 | |
| Tribunus Laticlavius | Quote:
__________________ Please note that 98% of what I say is my opinion and/or my "version" of the facts. Most of what I say is rumor with little to no evidence to back it up, just something I picked up somewhere. My City | |
| |
| | Post 12 |
| Tribuni Angusticlavii | Globalsecurity.org is a pretty good site, it's also good for a lot of misinformation. Bulldogg is right, sensitive information isn't going to be put out for public release. There's a lot of things that go on our birds that don't get released for Globalsecurity and other civilian run sites to ramble over. As for what's wrong with the (C)V-22, are you asking what's wrong in relation to not being a valid platform for CSAR or what's wrong with the platform in general? I'm not a pilot or a FE, I've been on them and there are guys from my community, pilots and FEs, that are transfering over to the -22 airframe. It's split down the middle on their feelings about it. Half depise it, half think it might be okay. Very few guys are 100% confident in it. The biggest issue, and they're tackling that as much as they can, is the lack of guns. The ramp is getting one, but there isn't much we can do for the sides.
__________________ Ugh. |
| |