| |
| | Post 1 | |
| Milforum's Bouncer | Post; USAR Readiness issuesQuote:
Any reservists on here have similar issues or a contradicting viewpoint from that of the author? With the US Army relying more heavily upon guard and reserve troops this is a serious concern. Incomplete and second rate training is a deadly mistake. Time to write letters to congressmen to light a fire under someone's backside.
__________________ "The purpose of fighting is to win. There is no possible victory in defense. The sword is more important than the shield and skill is more important than either. The final weapon is the brain. All else is supplemental." - John Steinbeck | |
| |
| | Post 2 | ||
| Tribuni Angusticlavii | Post; Re: USAR Readiness issuesQuote:
I saw a photo (ANG aiding in the current crisis) in the paper of a ANG soldier wearing M-1955 Body Armor, ANG soldiers had M16A1's. When my father was Guard (1995) they had .45's as standard issue sidearms. One of my CAP Captian's, who was a company leader in a Cav company, commanded an M113A1 from Veitnam, it still had the O.D. Green paint job and white star on the side.
__________________ F.O. Seaman CAP/USAFAUX DoA/DHS Administration Officer Golden Armor Composite Squadron, 15077 Fort Knox, Kentucky 40121 ![]() | ||
| |