Topic: US and Russian air fighters 3

U.S. Cavalry

FAQ/Rules - Search - Military Photo Gallery

  International Military Forums > Military Discussion Forums > Military Related Discussions
User Name
Password

 
June 12th, 2006   Post 21
zander_0633
Milforum Gnat
 
 
Gear

Well, the Su-47 sure have it's killer looks! Remains me of the aircraft in X-Men!

Is it possible to fit the Su with Us engines? If it is possible, then that bird sure has killer looks and killer power!
__________________

- Ready To Strike -
 
June 12th, 2006   Post 22
Senior Chief
Banned
 
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rabs
That wouldnt be becaused they "borrowed" some of our ideas would it. No, never.
Actually there is a high probabability that it was a two way trade off. I think we might have done a little spying in the day as well!
 
June 12th, 2006   Post 23
SwordFish_13
Tribuni Angusticlavii
 
 

Hi,

If we are Only Considering Looks .... Russian Birds Beat Everyone hands Down


^
An Indian SU 30 MKI
 
June 12th, 2006   Post 24
Senior Chief
Banned
 
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by SwordFish_13
Hi,

If we are Only Considering Looks .... Russian Birds Beat Everyone hands Down


Picture removed.

An Indian SU 30 MKI
I think each person may have a different outlook on the subject.

Beauty is in the eye of the beerholder!
 
June 12th, 2006   Post 25
AussieNick
Forum Digger
 
 
Gear

Nobody is right so you can't debate this.
Just give your opinions on the LOOKS!!!
It is a subjective matter, so don't treat it like it's not.
And for the record, right on Bulldogg. Looks can't kill.
__________________
Platoon Commander, 6 Platoon, B Company
10/27th Battalion
Royal South Australia Regiment

PRO PATRIA
 
June 12th, 2006   Post 26
Rabs
Tribuni Angusticlavii
 
 
Quote:
Looks can't kill.
You've aparently never seen my mother in the mornings.
__________________
 
June 12th, 2006   Post 27
Easy-8
Centurion
 
 
Gear

The F-23 the aircraft which lost to the F-22. However most people say it was by far the better looking of the two aircraft.

__________________
 
June 12th, 2006   Post 28
Rabs
Tribuni Angusticlavii
 
 
It is sleek.
 
June 12th, 2006   Post 29
Senior Chief
Banned
 
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Easy-8
The F-23 the aircraft which lost to the F-22. However most people say it was by far the better looking of the two aircraft.
But was it functional?
 
June 12th, 2006   Post 30
Rabs
Tribuni Angusticlavii
 
 
Quote:
But was it functional?
What do you mean? It just didnt fill the needs the air force wanted. I think there were some slight problems with the weapon bays but I it was functional.