![]() | About US political ad mistakenly shows German troops |
![]() |
| | #1 |
| | US political ad mistakenly shows German troops infoDemocrat Tim Spear's campaign has apologised after inadvertently sending voters a leaflet showing actors in World War II-era German uniforms The flyer read: "In combat, you always want another soldier covering your back." I'm all in favour of keeping dangerous weapons out of the hands of fools. Let's start with typewriters. Frank Lloyd Wright |
![]() | |
| |
| | #2 |
| |
That's embarrasing. Gunner. Sabot. Sniper. Is not an appropriate use of ammunition. |
| | #3 |
| |
Even worse I think those guys in the picture are playing SS
|
| | #4 |
| |
Someone's going to get fired?
|
| | #5 |
| |
Definitely. There was also another poster here for the Potomac College or something of that nature saying they were geared towards military students. The poster featured a soldier wearing a British desert combat uniform. |
| | #6 |
| |
How could you make such a mistake? Ok, they're facing the other way and the camo could be mistaken for American's in the pacific but just look at the helmets and I suppose their posture. Doesn't look very much like Americans. Either somebody doesn't know their history or they had a train to catch and copy and pasted anything that would look good!
Thanks Yin717 |
| | #7 |
| |
It would not be a problem for this type of mistake. It is why you are required to proof advertisement and sign off on it. After you do that you pay for the ad, even if mistakes are found later. People in advertising are not necessarily "into military stuff" and just used some file footage. This ad leaves the politician with egg on his face and the advertising company paid, but not likely to get repeat business. |
| | #8 |
| |
The gun that the far right soldier is holding looks like a Karabiner, though I can't tell what kind of model. Also, the same soldier's upper clothing is definitely not German
|
| | #9 | |
| | Quote:
| |
| | #10 |
| |
Maybe it was mistaken for multicam |
![]() |