Units' Deployment May Be Canceled

Team Infidel

Forum Spin Doctor
By LOLITA C. BALDOR
WASHINGTON - (AP) The Pentagon has tentative plans to halt the
scheduled deployment of two brigades to Iraq and instead send in smaller
teams to support and train Iraqi forces in what could be an early step
toward an eventual drawdown of U.S. forces, defense officials said
Wednesday.
The proposal comes amid growing pressure from Congress and the
public to pull troops out of Iraq. Details are still under discussion, and
it would largely depend on the military and political conditions there after
the parliamentary elections next week, said the officials.
The two officials, who did not want to be identified because the
plans have not yet been finalized, said a third brigade, initially scheduled
to go to Afghanistan, may also stay home. Defense Secretary Donald H.
Rumsfeld is preparing to announce the plan after the Iraq election next
Thursday, if all goes well, they said.
Pentagon officials have said all along that they hope to reduce U.S.
troop levels, now at about 154,000, as Iraqi security forces become more
capable of defending their own country. A brigade usually numbers around
3,500 troops.
Under the plan, deployment of the 1st Brigade, 1st Infantry
Division, based at Fort Riley, Kan., would be canceled. Instead, for the
first time, portions of the brigade would be divided into 10- or 11-member
military transition teams that would be sent separately into Iraq to work
with Iraqi security forces.
Also, some other members of the brigade would go to Iraq to do
security duty, such as guarding high profile targets.
The second unit that would not deploy to Iraq is the 2nd Brigade,
1st Armored Division, which is currently in Kuwait and is usually based in
Germany. Under the plan, up to two-thirds of the brigade would return to
Germany, while the rest would stay in Kuwait, prepared to respond to any
emergency in Iraq.
The 4th Brigade, 10th Mountain Division, based at Fort Polk, La.,
would not go to Afghanistan.
NATO has been gradually expanding across Afghanistan, assuming
responsibility for security from the U.S.-led coalition. The NATO-led force
has about 12,000 soldiers from 36 nations and is responsible for security in
Kabul as well as northern and western regions of the country. A separate,
20,000-strong U.S.-led force is in the east and south hunting Taliban and
al-Qaida fighters.
The new deployment plan would not dramatically reduce the number
U.S. forces in Iraq but instead would set the stage for a gradual troop
reduction, allowing the military to stop or delay other unit deployments
planned for 2006-2008.
President Bush has refused to set a withdrawal timetable, and the
administration has consistently said U.S. troops will remain as long as
needed. The administration, with Vice President Dick Cheney at the
forefront, has strongly criticized a call last week by Rep. John Murtha,
D-Pa., for a U.S. withdrawal within six months.
A month ago, the Pentagon announced that more than 92,000 troops
would be in the next rotation of U.S. forces in Iraq. Rumsfeld said the
92,000 should not be taken as the final troop level and said the exact size
would not be decided until after the election. The usual troop level this
year has been about 138,000, but the total peaked at about 160,000 this fall
because of concerns about heightened violence during the elections.
 
Back
Top