![]() | About Unconstitutional Search prompts foul cries from Congressional Republicians Page 4 |
![]() |
| | #31 | |
| | Quote:
That was a very funny question though. Try freerepublic.com to see, for real, how people support GOP and Pres. Bush | |
![]() | |
| |
| | #32 |
| |
My stats came from a poll done by ABCNEWS (which is center) and you call that untrustworthy. Your response is Freerepublic? You just proved Ted correct, if the news is unfavoriable to you its obviously false and when its from largest Bush apologist website on the internet its information is totally correct. That's just living in denial. |
| | #33 | |
| | Quote:
Ut ceteri vivant. | |
| | #34 |
| |
PJ, do you think its possible to plug the holes without losing our freedoms as Americans? Can we tighten up our security and leave the constitution and bill of rights intact? I make no claims to genius but my brain can't wrap itself around an answer that does.
"The purpose of fighting is to win. There is no possible victory in defense. The sword is more important than the shield and skill is more important than either. The final weapon is the brain. All else is supplemental." - John Steinbeck |
| | #35 |
| |
That is a really though question Bulldogg, and to be honest it will take some effort to close the gaps. You´ll always have people opposing and claiming that their constitutional rights are being infringed even if this isn´t the case. And how to monitor all the emails and phone calls? Do this ransomly and you catch a bad guy by luck. Do it thorough and you are in the grey area´s of civil rights. It is difficult... I am curious how they´ll go about it!
|
| | #36 |
| | That is a tough one, B. I think in order for more security we are going to have to make a few changes, but I don't believe they need to be so great that it changes the basic rights afforded in the Constitution/BoRs. Exactly how we do that without crossing the line, I don't know. Something for the brain to chew on. |
| | #37 |
| |
Like I said, the US has faced enemies greater than terrorism in her past and it successfully confronted those enemies without making any changes to the constitution. I dont see any justification to do so now with an enemy whom in my opinion is far less dangerous than say the 3rd Reich or Stalin's USSR.
|
| | #38 | |
| | Quote:
Try freerepublic.com dude and stop whinning! If they're Bush apologists, then who are you? Are you not a RATs' apologist too? Last edited by phoenix80; May 27th, 2006 at 08:37.. | |
| | #39 | |
| | Quote:
You dont think I already have? That site is for GOP drones who are simply too lazy and narrow-minded to do their own research to formulate their own opinions. And for your information, I dont get 'facts' (I use the term loosely) from left wing apologist sites neither, you have never seen me quote Moveon.org have you? Thats the difference between you and I. | |
| | #40 | |
| | Quote:
| |
![]() |