Topic: Turning point of WW2 23

U.S. Cavalry

FAQ/Rules - Search - Military Photo Gallery

  International Military Forums > Military History Forums > World War 1 to World War 2 Forum
User Name
Password

 
September 20th, 2005   Post 221
panzer
Optio
 
 
Gear

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ray89
i think if the germans could keep their alliance with russian troops.. the war would of ended verry differant

Never happen. Stalin was eyeing eastern europe that is part of the reason he jumped into bed with Hitler in the first place. In return for the non-aggro pact with germany they partition poland and the baltic states. And buys time to coming industrializing his nation and place it on a war footing which like every other nation in world was behind germany.


On a side note it awesome to see this discussion still going on. I have been gone for awhile and can't wait to get back into the discussion.
__________________

"If the tanks succeed, then victory follows."
- Heinz Guderian
 
September 20th, 2005   Post 222
Pyro
Optio
 
I am sure i will take a major bashing for this. but i think the turning point was the whole start of the war. IIRC he told his Admirals they would have until 1945 to prepare the navy. by then he promised them they would have Aircraft Carriers.
 
September 28th, 2005   Post 223
CanadianCombat
Centurion
 
 
Gear

Russian Canpaign
__________________
If we don't end war,war will end us.
 
September 28th, 2005   Post 224
Padre
Milforum Chaplain
 
 
Gear

I'm convinced what lost Hitler the war - and thank God he did - was his invasion of Russia. No Eastern Front would have meant the Nazi's could have driven harder on England, Africa, Italian Penninsula, etc - at least it would have stretched the war out to perhaps 1950 because Germany, without Russian campaign, would have had twice the army in action than it ended up with in 1944/45. So the turning point I believe was that point when Germany was defeated on its Eastern Front losing hundreds of thousands of troops and assets to the Russians. She was weakened severly after that and also that's when German commanders realised the war was lost and started plotting against Hitler - unsuccessfully.
 
September 28th, 2005   Post 225
Kevin
Immunes
 
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ray89
i think if the germans could keep their alliance with russian troops.. the war would of ended verry differant
I agree with you there.
 
September 28th, 2005   Post 226
Doppleganger
Tribuni Angusticlavii
 
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kevin
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ray89
i think if the germans could keep their alliance with russian troops.. the war would of ended verry differant
I agree with you there.
Very big 'if' though IMO. Asking 2 megalomaniacs in charge of 2 superpowers armed to the teeth, with totally opposed ideologies, who both covet the same territory, to keep the peace for any length of time is like asking Wayne Rooney to stay on the pitch for 90 minutes, or Kate Moss to stay off coke, in other words nigh on impossible. War in Russia was inevitable.

To answer those who simply state that Hitler attacking the USSR cost him the war. It's too simple and easy to say that. Germany had chances to defeat the Soviet Union had they done some things differently. They had the chance to make peace with the USSR and revert back to pre-war borders as late as mid 1943, effectively moving the Soviet Union out of the picture. This would have made any Allied invasion in 1944 very difficult indeed, if not impossible. Hitler would have been free to keep almost all of Europe under the jackboot and who knows how history may have changed as a result.
__________________
"An Emperor is subject to no-one but God and justice."

Frederick 1, Barbarossa
 
October 6th, 2005   Post 227
bootxbomber
Tirones
 
Okay I think there are several mistakes Hitler made throughout the war. 1 of which was stupid. "Battle of Britain". Hitler should of ignored the bombings of Berlin by RAF and continued there attacks against British Air Fields and smashing communication infustructures. By then, Hitler could of resumed the invasion of Britain. Only then, there would of never been a D-Day invasion which then change the course of history as we speak. All of Britains war material would of belong to Germany. Plus without France or Britain capable of future attacks. There would of been virtually no allied shipments to Russia by the atlantic. Which would of crumbled Russia's war material by constant attacks from the Luftwaffe and no way of resupplying its forces in time. Russia would of then collapsed. Plus more countries joining the Axis powers from Asia or the Middle East. The African Campaign, would of gone successful. Conquering Egypt, Iraq, India and so forth. Thus, Europe would of been in German control for many many years. Don't forget the southern part of France would of therefore be conquered once the Facist party in Spain wins the elections. Only then America along with Mexico and Canada would of faced the Axis powers alone. Which we all know the Mexicans would definitely join Axis powers once they realize they could have economic ties plus realizing war is among them. Which then an invasion from Southern Africa to Southern America into Brazil. Then Hawaii would of been taken by axis powers mainly Japan and the American navy pushed back into its own waters. While the future attacks from the Japanese navy and air force pounding the California coast with its battleships & cruisers. German forces invading from Siberia to Alaska. Therefore to the invasion of Canada. Followed by the United States, by a 4 front war (Northwestern front from Canada, Western front from California, Southern front from Mexico and Northeastern front Nova Scotia/Maine). And finally, what all Axis powers want "World Domination".
 
October 10th, 2005   Post 228
Fox
Can you hear me now?
 
 
Gear

Yeah, Battle of Britain and Battle of Midway was major turning point of WW2. Also Stalingrad.