| |
| | Post 11 | |
| Milforum's Bouncer | Quote:
__________________ "The purpose of fighting is to win. There is no possible victory in defense. The sword is more important than the shield and skill is more important than either. The final weapon is the brain. All else is supplemental." - John Steinbeck | |
| |
| | Post 12 |
| Tribunus Laticlavius | My money is on Turkey, they have been more than restrained up until now even as it grows more and more obvious that Iraq is going to do nothing and more likely incapable of doing anything so its up to the Turkish government to protect its own people and I am sure they can do that most effectively once the gloves are off. As for the gorilla well in this case it is somewhat toothless because the only real threat it has is of military action and I am reasonably sure that the day US troops open fire on Turkish troops to protect a group that its own state department have labeled a terrorist organisation will be a very interesting day in world and domestic politics.
__________________ To mistrust science and deny the validity of the scientific method is to resign your job as a human. You'd better go look for work as a plant or wild animal. P. J. O'Rourke |
| |
| | Post 13 |
| Milforum's Bouncer | The US cuts Turkey loose, no aid, no training, no nothing... there are a couple teeth still intact. And which country was it that didn't want to let our troops use her territory for a staging round for the invasion of Iraq? |
| |
| | Post 14 | |
| Tribunus Laticlavius | Quote:
I am thinking the remaining intact teeth could are getting a little blunt. | |
| |
| | Post 15 | ||
| Milforum's Bouncer | Third largest trading partner... Quote:
That's could smart a bit. Quote:
No man is an island, and in the world's globalised economy, nor is any country, metaphorically speaking. | ||
| |
| | Post 16 |
| Tribunus Laticlavius | All true but I suspect irrelevant, as I said earlier I think it will be an interesting day in politics when the USA moves to protect an organisation it has labeled a terrorist group. Some how I just don't think that America will go to war, impose sanctions, place embargo's or in fact do anything more than make the usual "political" noises about regret, all this hype about terrorism and the global war has come back to bite you on the arse here. Essentially you are stuck with a choice: A) Take action against Turkey and watch the war on terror become a joke. B) Buy off the Turks for the short term (could be expensive they don't seem to be for sale). C) Let them do what they want to do and wave goodbye to Kurds as allies |
| |
| | Post 17 |
| Tribunus Laticlavius | The turkish guys, at least, put their case well, and i am pleased at how Turkey has been determined to maintain its secular stance, as per Attaturk. As for Iraq, yes, now let me see............ what is needed............. is another Sadam! It seems that all they respect is strength and power. Ole'. |
| |
| | Post 18 |
| Milforum's Bouncer | Fourth option, coalition forces hunt down PKK members inside Iraq. Fifth option. Get the Iraqi Kurds to hand them over by offering a homeland in return. I like 5 the best, these people got shafted when Britain and France arbitrarily drew lines in the sand post WWI. |
| |
| | Post 19 |
| Tribunus Laticlavius | 4. Will just mean Coalition forces get shot at instead of Turkish ones and given the coalitions inability to finish anything we will be holding the same argument in 6 months. 5. Might work but I doubt Turkey would or should turn over territory however if the Iraqi's want to give them a chunk of Iraq good for them, to be honest though handing over territory for peace didn't work that well in the 1930's and I am pretty sure will be just as ineffective this time. |
| |
| | Post 20 | |
| U of B and B Alumnus | Quote:
Way I see it the US cannot attack Turkey without NATO Forces (minus the US of course) needing by Law to attack the United States in return, and Canada is right across our Northern Border, so, that would not turn out well for the United States, otherwise NATO ends because of nations breaking the Treaty. And it is true that President Bush couldn't bribe the Turks before the Iraq misadventure, so I, like you do not believe the Turks can be bought off, seeing how it is their own Nation under attack from the Terrorists (Kurds). Turkey moves into Iraq Militarily and I do not believe there will be many Kurds left, and as the United States has claimed the right of attacking any Nation that offers Safe Harbor to Terrorists engaged against the United States, well, Turkey attacking Iraq for offering Safe Harbor to Terrorist attacking Turkey seems legal enough.
__________________ Last edited by Gator; November 2nd, 2007 at 07:55. Reason: Deleted "to" in one place. | |
| |
![]() |