| |
| | Post 51 |
| Primus Pilus | Yes, welcome, Zyca! I think you're like the first Taiwanese on the forum.
__________________ \"The superior man, when resting in safety, does not forget that danger may come. When in a state of security he does not forget the possibility of ruin. When all is orderly, he does not forget that disorder may come. Thus his person is not endangered, and his States and all their clans are preserved.\" |
| |
| | Post 52 |
| Tribuni Angusticlavii | How come? Should be the second, the Thread Starter was the First
__________________ From Corporals to Generals. Rising Dragons of Middle Kingdom. http://s3.invisionfree.com/PLA_MILIT...TURE/index.php |
| |
| | Post 53 |
| Primus Pilus | cool, mind to show us some pics of taiwan?
__________________ A signature is a little text that can be added at the bottom of the posts you make. It\'s limited to 300 characters (size 7 to 12) on 5 line(s) and 1 image(s) with none larger than 100x500 pixels and for a maximum of 20Kb. In your text, no more than 100 characters without space too. |
| |
| | Post 54 |
| Optio | Hey, nice to meet everyone! I recently got back from Taiwan (like 3 weeks ago) and had to endure the politics in Taiwan daily when I was there. People are extremely divided in Taiwan. I hope to learn more from different perspectives in this forum and hopefully have more people understand what the Taiwanese are thinking |
| |
| | Post 55 | |
| Optio | Quote:
Pardon my ignorance, what is CSB? | |
| |
| | Post 56 | |
| Optio | Quote:
| |
| |
| | Post 57 | |
| Optio | Quote:
| |
| |
| | Post 58 | |
| Optio | Quote:
2. First, good for u to agree it that u r same etnic. As I had say for many times. Same etnic and speaking group is one of the criteria I think Taiwan is not independent. And also, be rasional, why China warned Taiwan? The reason is becoz they did not want Taiwan to do something that's unlawful and disgrace, that's why he warn. So how can u say they just want to GET RIP OF? Even more, u should have know more than I, Taiwan political system is a totally b******t. No further explain coz u know 3. Japanese r definately ******* of the millenium. They came and burned all the Taiwanese ancestor's worship board and did a "Ancestor changing" ceremony, turn their ancestor to Japanese and since then they make Taiwanese full with Japanese culture. They also caught(Actually they lied to them) some Taiawanese women to be comfort girls at the occupation area. U wanna talk Japanese? arse! And, I believe that China did give Taiwan developement, Zheng Cheng Gong din come and develope Taiwan? After Ch'ng Dynasty got Taiwan back they din develope Taiwan? Don't lie to me plz. 4. Occupiers, huh! What a disgrace. For I said u have been brainwash by many lying fact. Taiwan is not a colony of China as state in the history. It's a proper territory. U want to know what is real colony? Come over to South East Asia plz. 5. I raftly know what happen it 1945-1949. After gotting Taiwan back, KMT soldiers went in to Taiwan and a few men among the thousands took gun and shoot the civilians, for some reason, maye accidentally. And this contribute to "Racial" conflict between the local Taiwanese with Mainlanders. However, it was later controled well by KMT and KMT also built Chinese schools and develope Taiwan, under a part of China. U cannot deny so. Let's go trough the recent history. IN year 1943 there was a Cairo Declration, where it stated that after the WW II end, Manchuria, Northeast China, Taiwan and etc territory will be giving back to China from Japanese hands. In year 1945, There was a Postam (Bo-Si-Tan) Agreement in No.8, Stated that all the statement in Cairo Declaration 1943 must be fullfilled. So Taiwan is given back to China. Also in one time American President (Roswell/Truman forgotten) said to the world officially that Taiwan is GIVEN BACK TO CHINA. But the IT fellas translated this saying wrongly. In year 1951, there was a Los Angelas(Was it los angelas? Chinese translation was Old-Gold Mountain) Agreement state that Japanese officially give up authority over Taiwan, this agreement was signed by Japanese and USA only, but in the statement they didn't said they given to who! But this agreement has to be signed by Chinese! But the problem was during that time China had been communist land, so USA forced Japanese to signed this agreement with Chiang Khai Shik(In the land of Republic of China) in 1952. (The Japanese din want to do so, becoz they think they should sign this agreement with Beijing , Not Taiwan, but USA still forced them to do so) In year 1978, China mainland and Japanese signed an agreement, said that Japanese will give all lost territory to China back, but they did not say Taiwan, for Taiwan has been given in year 1951. And in this agreement it also said that Japanese will respect the China Tong-yi (Tong-yi......something like reunification, well I wrote this to cyca, so u know what I am saying). I hate the Taiwanese education minister tried to skip the Cairo declaration 1943 and Postam declration 1945 in the new history text book. But they mentioned Los Angelos agreement 1951 very heavily. WHY? Becoz they want TI! Illegally! Where is Taiwan when Asians r appealing to look properly at the denial of Japanese over history for they also victims?Still Lee Deng Hui everyday barking like dog saying the Japanese r the best.U Taiwanese cannot handle 921 and SARs, plz don't come and find China, China were also facing many problems in the mainland. Even China did wanted to help, what will the Taiwan government do about it? Remember Taiwan r richer than China. Many people in China also have problems and u want to wate China's money and then still claim IT? Xiang De Mei(In ur dreams)! | |
| |
| | Post 59 | |
| Optio | Quote:
1. Believe it or not, native Taiwanese people did not need KMT's words to know that they are different from the Chinese. KMT actually came in acting exactly like "occupiers", calling the local Taiwanese "Japanese slaves" or "slave people". Strip them of land, belongings, and forbade them from participating in politics. You should know that when the KMT came, native Taiwanese thought of them as saviors, to free them from the Japanese and to finally be treated equally and with respect. But in contrast, the corruption and the lack of respect only made them look worse. Native Taiwanese needed not to be taught that Chinese are different, they saw it with their own eyes. Can you understand at least WHY the native Taiwanese want to have a country of their own? Put aside your colored glass that Taiwan is part of China, at least know why before you flame the 'TI fellas'. TI is not a product of brainwashing, TI is a direction more and more Taiwanese want to take. And the fact that Taiwan was not legally recognized as a country = China owns Taiwan? If China was not so powerful, no one would even blink an eye if TI is declared now. Face it, it's the power you enjoy, not the legitimacy you claim so that Taiwan cannot become independent. 2. My grandfather was only half the story, my mother is from the native Taiwanese side. I don't consider myself pure Chinese but a 'mix'. Believing the same religion, speaking the same language, eating the same primary food, etc. show what influenced your culture. It does not, however, gives you the right to anyone else's land. Taiwanese want to do something 'unlawful' and 'disgrace'? We view Chinese' bullying action 'unreasonable' and 'barbaric'! Seriously, what will happen once China invades Taiwan and occupies it later? View the people on the island as traitors and less-pure? Disrespect the people for voicing their opinions that they want to be their own master? 3. What the Japanese did differed little from what the KMT did, and will probably differ little from what the PRC will do when they invade and occupy Taiwan. Are they going to let the native Taiwanese believe that they came very close to having their own country? Not a chance in hell, they will burn and wipe out the trace. 1662, Zheng Ch'eng-kung loyalists came and fought the Dutch, took control of Taiwan, to do what? Do you know? History repeats itself, he (actually his son) did what the KMT did when it was fighting PRC, he used the resources on the island, thinking that he can reconquer China and re-establish Ming over Manchu. By looking at history, China will come and conquer the small island just like what Manchu did to Zheng. You want to talk developments? Come to Taiwan, pay a visit, look around and see for yourself. I won't lie but I don't pretend to know it all, seeing is believing. 4. Disgrace, what a strong word. Anything opposing your "great China" idea is a disgrace. Mongolia was probably a disgrace, Tibet is probably a disgrace too. Considering PRC has questionable rights to Taiwan, I wouldn't call native Taiwanese or myself calling them "occupiers" when they invade a disgrace. Hey, Taiwan has been a colony before, the Dutch merchants made Taiwan attractive to Japanese and Chinese alike, but the goal? Benefit from the island. 1662 Zheng and his loyalists took Taiwan, the goal? Re-conquer the mainland. 1895-1902 Japanese took Taiwan, the goal? Colonizing at first, turning everyone into Japanese later. 1945 KMT took Taiwan, the goal? Sack the resources to support KMT's forces in mainland to fight PRC. Why are they not occupiers? Now we are in 2004, PRC wanting to take Taiwan, the goal? What is it? Save the people? Help out developments in Taiwan? Re-unite the brothers and sisters whom you don't even know what they are like? Brainwashed? Who's brainwashed? Taiwanese people wanting TI, the goal? To be a disgrace? To annoy China? To look for trouble? No, we just want a land of our own, have our policies created by our people, have our leaders selected by popularity. What is so hard to understand? 5. Let me re-state your belief: KMT came over, had an "accident" shooting a civilian, which created "racial" uprising, and was later controlled "well". Hmm, where to begin. 228 incident, heard of it? I did an extensive research on it, it will take too long to describe everything. We can discuss this in another thread if you are interested. Let me just simply counter by saying no, the whole thing was triggered by an accident, but a racial uprising cannot be turned on by a mere accident. And no, it was not controlled well at all. KMT briefly lost the control of the island, and later a massacre took place similar to Nanking massacre done by the Japanese when KMT's supporting army landed. And no, KMT's true development did not start until they completely lost the war in mainland and was forced to retreat to Taiwan. Even then, the goal of schools, factories, everything, was for the preparation of re-conquering China. Before lifting the martial law, the KMT claimed to have over 500,000 great army stationed in Taiwan waiting to fight back. You will not develop a country well when your focus is only military, won't you agree? Cairo Declaration reverts Taiwan's control to the ROC government under Chiang Kai-shek's KMT, it has nothing to do with PRC. ("Japan has stolen from the Chinese, such as Manchuria, Formosa, and the Pescadores, shall be restored to the Republic of China") Since this is not going to strengthen the case for PRC, I don't think we should even discuss it. I understand that ROC, PRC, Japanese, etc. all occupied Taiwan before, but that only means the occupiers changed. No one really thought for the native Taiwanese who did not know how to speak for themselves in the international world. Now, DPP has stepped up and changed the face of Taiwan. Visit Taipei under Chen, visit Kaoshiung under Hiseh, etc. Btw, it's San Francisco. And I agree with you, education, media, newspaper, are all just tools. But you should read the textbooks I used when I studied in Taiwan. They desperately needed to be updated. Incorrect facts, misleading quotes, etc. It seems that you pay a lot of attention to the Taiwanese news, where do you get the information? If you read Chinese, I have a good compilation of list of Taiwanese media, I like to read all of them to get different opinions: http://www.chineseypage.com/web-news-tw.htm Taiwan was there when recently a Japanese dude came out and claimed their textbooks of detailing too much of their atrocity. It was reported in one of the links up there I provided dated 11/29/2004 ( I believe, or 28, it's very recently). By the way, Chinese mainland suffer greatly from frequent floods, Taiwan has aided China in monetary basis to a great amount. Based on your logic, Taiwan should not have helped becuase China is always bullying us around, right? Heck, I agree! Taiwanese government is rich, and the aid does not always please the people because WE wanted to benefit from the money, but that's besides the point. Taiwanese did handle 921, and did handle SARS on our own. Not to mention SARS broke out in China to begin with and was kept undercover by the government when prompt care could've prevented a wide-spread. 921 help was deterred by the Chinese government, Turkey aid plane was not allowed accross the Chinese territory to help, Red Cross from around the world was not allowed direct help until later. SARS? That's even worse. Go back and lookup "Who cares about you Taiwanese" in google or something. Find the spokesperson for PRC when Taiwan was requesting to join the WHO to jointly find a cure for SARS, as an OBSERVER. My point is exactly this, we can handle stuff on our own even when PRC is pulling our legs, so why wouldn't we think that we are independent? Why wouldn't we WANT to be independent? We are already independent, we just don't have the recognition. Why? Because China's got the fist. Anyone disagrees will get a punch in the face. Do you truly think that anyone CARES about one-China if not to please China? | |
| |
| | Post 60 |
| Centurion | Why complain? You know that PRC doesn't appreciate Taiwan's Indepedence Movement.
__________________ \"When you kill one, it is a tragedy. When you kill ten million, it is a statistic.\" - Joseph Stalin |
| |