| |
| | Post 1 |
| Optio | Post; Tougher Penalties for Posers Coming Soon!Would toughen penalties for unauthorized wearing of medals By John Hoellwarth Times staff writer Legislation introduced in the House of Representatives July 22 calls for stiffer penalties against those who pretend to rate military decorations they didn’t earn. Rep. John Salazar, D-Colo., authored “The Stolen Valor Act of 2005,” an initiative he said would preserve the honor of military awards by giving authorities the ability to prosecute phonies. The legislation would close a loophole in current law that allows fakers to avoid prosecution as long as they never physically wear the medal they claim to rate. The bill states that anyone who fraudulently claims, “verbally or in writing, to have been awarded any decoration or medal authorized by Congress,” will face fines, up to six months imprisonment or both. Fines would be raised and maximum prison terms doubled for those claiming to rate combat valor awards such as the Navy Cross or Silver Star. “Our country is at war and our men and women are sacrificing,” Salazar said at a July 22 press conference on Capitol Hill. “For all the real heroes, there are hundreds of phonies who dishonor them.” Salazar insisted “we need this legislation” to honor our country’s fighting men and women by preserving the integrity of the awards with which they are recognized. This is good - I hate people who pretend they are someone that they really aren't. Douchebags... |
| |
| | Post 2 |
| Optio | I hope it passes. |
| |
| | Post 3 |
| Optio | Me too.. I hate people who act like someone they aren't. Pogues... Nothing makes me feel better and at the same time worse then outting someone who isn't who they say they are. SEALs, SF, Ranger, MACV SOG, Snipers... theres a ton of them out there and all posting on message boards apparently... |
| |
| | Post 4 | |
| Milforum Moderator ![]() | Quote:
While I have no problems calling a fake a fake on the internet - they really aren't a huge concern for me. I am more interested in those attempting to take advantage of others and profit from they unearned 'valour' than the internet dink using cool guy creds to impress others. The act needs to be more clearly defined, and it needs to focus on the big fish .. not the little inconsequential ones. The little fish generally fry themselves, I've found. Another thing I do not care for is the bill is attempting to include manufacturers. There are many legitimate vendors out there who provide medals to collectors/museums. I am 100% behind punishing those that would happily steal what was earned in sweat, blood and tears - but I also like clearly defined laws with not much wriggle room. | |
| |
| | Post 5 |
| Master Gunner | Makes sense to me, I'll second that. |
| |
| | Post 6 |
| Banned ![]() | "stolen valour act"] that is a Great name |
| |
| | Post 7 |
| PainMaster | I saw this too and I think it's a great piece of legislation to combat frauds. RnderSafe made a good point too. Obviously, the severity is a big difference betwen someone just trying to pick up grils at a bar and somebody lieing about there background to get a job.
__________________ |
| |
| | Post 8 | |
| Primus Pilus | Post; Stolen ValorWhat do you think about this? http://www.homeofheroes.com/herobill/index.html Quote:
| |
| |
| | Post 9 |
| Milforum Pivotman | Sounds to me like a fair thing to do...The only men to wear medals should be those who earned them...
__________________ C/1Lt Ret. Henderson "Life is a tragedy to those who feel, and a comedy to those who think."- Fortune Cookie |
| |
| | Post 10 |
| Milforum Moderator ![]() | Thread merged - remember to always perform a search prior to starting new topics. |
| |