Topic: The Top Military Powers 20 Years From Now 4

U.S. Cavalry

FAQ/Rules - Search - Military Photo Gallery

  International Military Forums > Military Discussion Forums > Military Related Discussions
User Name
Password

 
April 11th, 2007   Post 31
bulldogg
Milforum's Bouncer
 
 
Gear


Feeding the wolf so he doesn't eat the sheep.
__________________
"The purpose of fighting is to win. There is no possible victory in defense. The sword is more important than the shield and skill is more important than either. The final weapon is the brain. All else is supplemental." - John Steinbeck
 
April 12th, 2007   Post 32
the_13th_redneck
No Chance Outside
 
 
Gear

Kind of but not really.
The chances of North Korea actually winning a war against the South is pretty darn slim at this point.
The problem arises when North Korea LOSES. South Korea needs to rebuild North Korea which will strain the economy like crazy. South Korea can't afford to rebuild North Korea and still maintain its economic growth. So in other words, South Korea's government doesn't want reunification. That's why we're stopping them from collapsing. Reunification, and even perhaps a short war, will be too expensive.
__________________
I don't exist.
TRESPASSERS WILL BE PROSTITUTED

Next time you travel http://www.epictrip.com
 
April 12th, 2007   Post 33
bulldogg
Milforum's Bouncer
 
 
Gear


Is it worse than the hit that West Germany took when they reunified?
 
April 12th, 2007   Post 34
the_13th_redneck
No Chance Outside
 
 
Gear

I don't know the details but I would imagine that it could be worse.
If we have a war before unification, then we would have a situation FAR worse than Germany had.
Even without it, we don't have an economy the size of Germany's and I can't see North Korea's current state any better than East Germany was back when they got unified. Right now what we have in North Korea is a humanitarian catastrophe.
Yeah, I'd say it's going to be far worse.
 
May 25th, 2007   Post 35
Red_Army
Optio
 
 
I don't get why China is 4th and India is 2nd? China's military buildup is all over the news. Its military budget for 2007, jumped 17.8%. And its been climbing for 18 consecutive years. US Department of defense estimates China's real military budget is 90 billion US dollars and climbing.

This is what Donald Rumsfeld had to say in 2005
http://video.msn.com/v/us/msnbc.htm?.../8091198/ET&fg=
 
May 25th, 2007   Post 36
bulldogg
Milforum's Bouncer
 
 
Gear


Quote:
Originally Posted by Red_Army
I don't get why China is 4th and India is 2nd?
I'd be willing to venture its based on a couple things.

1) Quality of equipment being bought rather than quantity

2) Quality of troops and their training

 
May 25th, 2007   Post 37
Red_Army
Optio
 
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by bulldogg
I'd be willing to venture its based on a couple things.

1) Quality of equipment being bought rather than quantity

2) Quality of troops and their training

But China's defense spending is 3X as high as India's. How do you know China's equipment is not better than India's?
 
May 25th, 2007   Post 38
bulldogg
Milforum's Bouncer
 
 
Gear


First hand knowledge mate.
 



Similar Threads
Tucson Military Recruiters Ran Cocaine
Military Taking A Tougher Line With Detainees
China plans to invade US!
India, China seek to resolve boundary dispute
Chinese Military Doctrine