| |
| | Post 21 |
| Tribuni Angusticlavii | but honestly, how fast does a spyplane really need to be? are we overdoing it with the almost mach 10 speeds?
__________________ ![]() si deum nobiscum, quis contra? AS LONG AS DIXIE STILL EXISTS,THIS COUNTRY WILL NEVER FALL |
| |
| | Post 22 |
| Centurion | I don't think that their only purpose for testing these devices at such high speeds is using them for spying, they could also be used for space travel
__________________ You can either agree with me or be wrong! |
| |
| | Post 23 |
| Centurion | Post; sr-71 bLACKBIRDAmazing shots of the SR-71 BlackBird ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
| |
| | Post 24 |
| Centurion | Post; X-15X-15 ![]() ![]() X-43 ![]() |
| |
| | Post 25 | ||
| Optio | Quote:
__________________ Flight, mans greatest accomplishment since sliced bread... \"Forget the torpedoes, Full speed ahead!\" Admiral David Glasgow Farragut (1801-1870). Aboard Hartford \"The battle of Iwo Jima has been won. Among the Americans who served on Iwo, uncommon valor was a common virtue.\"Nimitz http://s14.invisionfree.com/3rd_Army/index.php?act=idx | ||
| |
| | Post 26 | |
| Optio | Quote:
I would still like to research that incident (and the many others that undoubtedly occured). I'm curious to see how Soviet SA Missiles faired against the Blackbird. From my reference material on the Soviet Army (published circa 1981), the SA-2, SA-10, and SA-11 have the written stats to contend with the SR-71, though the SA-2 is fairly outdated in terms with the SR-71 (probably highly susceptible to counter-measures and evasive maneuvers) and the SA-11 would have to catch the SR-71 quickly since it is just under the max speed. SA-10 seems the likely choice to attack the SR-71, with a Mach 6 speed, 30km (18+ miles) ceiling, and a very high acceleration, though I am not sure if the Soviet Union had a large defense of these (perhaps just stuck with older SA models). However, I do believe the spyplane has lost most of its use, now that it is in competition with the spy satellites. | |
| |