Topic: Terror suspect turns to Australian court (AP)

U.S. Cavalry

FAQ/Rules - Search - Military Photo Gallery

  International Military Forums > Military Discussion Forums > Political Discussions
User Name
Password

 
February 26th, 2007   Post 1
News Manager
Caesar
 

Post; Terror suspect turns to Australian court (AP)


AP - Lawyers for an Australian held at Guantanamo Bay went to court Monday in a bid to force his government to bring the 31-year-old alleged Taliban fighter home.

Read more...
 
February 26th, 2007   Post 2
senojekips
Tribunus Laticlavius
 
 
Why should the Australian taxpayer have to pay for his incarceration. We don't want the imbecile. Plus, he's broken no Australian law, so I'm told.

I think he should stay in American hands.
__________________
"Those with ulterior motives may tell you what you wish to hear, but a real friend tells you what you need to know"
http://www.geocities.com/senojekips/Index.htm
 
February 26th, 2007   Post 3
Gator
U of B and B Alumnus
 
 
Gear


Yes but the American Taxpayer should likewise not have to suffer the burden of the Terrorist in question.
Seeing how Mr. Hicks is now in my opinion a man without a Country, I say Firing Squad is the best solution all the way around (except perhaps for Mr. Hicks) after a very quick Military Trial of course, and one done on Pay Per View, so as to recoup at least some of the expense that the US Government has already put out to date in the way of lodgings for and upkeep of Mr. Hicks, plus transportation from the Battlefield to Club Gitmo.
__________________
http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b106/ASROC/MilforumUofBB2.jpg
 
February 26th, 2007   Post 4
senojekips
Tribunus Laticlavius
 
 
Done! Gator. Now it's up to you to sell this to congress.
 
February 26th, 2007   Post 5
Gator
U of B and B Alumnus
 
 
Gear


Quote:
Originally Posted by senojekips
Done! Gator. Now it's up to you to sell this to congress.
Congress has the power to constitute tribunals inferior to the Supreme Court, and define and punish offenses against the laws of Nations, but sadly there seems to be little will to do so in the US Congress at the present time, nor has there been much will to do so for the past 6 years in my opinion.

I would have done things differently in regards to the Afghan Op, very, very differently, but then I'm never put in charge of such things.
 
February 28th, 2007   Post 6
Padre
Milforum Chaplain
 
 
Gear

Quote:
Originally Posted by senojekips
Why should the Australian taxpayer have to pay for his incarceration. We don't want the imbecile. Plus, he's broken no Australian law, so I'm told.

I think he should stay in American hands.
If only Hick's was a Nazi, he could be rescued from prison by the Vatican hey Seno ? !
 
February 28th, 2007   Post 7
senojekips
Tribunus Laticlavius
 
 
Got it in one Padre.

He has broken no Australian law (apparently), he was captured by the Afghan Northern Alliance and sold to the Americans as a possible source of intelligence. Nothing to do with us.

Plus I am of the opinion that he was a willing supporter of a religious group who would murder people purely on the grounds of religious belief, which to me means he's lower than a politician. and that is as low as my scale goes.
 
February 28th, 2007   Post 8
Padre
Milforum Chaplain
 
 
Gear

.....and he should receive the Chinese burn, and the Nipple Cripple, each day from nurse Diesel (Cloris Leachman in High Anxiety).
 
February 28th, 2007   Post 9
senojekips
Tribunus Laticlavius
 
 
I'm not sure that your suggestion is covered under the Geneva Convention.

I'll get back to you on that one. Our lawyers are getting quite creative with their interpretations these days, especially if a plum job is dangled in front of them.
 



Similar Threads
Appeals Court Backs Detainee
Court To Oversee U.S. Wiretapping In Terror Cases
Australian planned holy war attacks, court told
Hussein, Back in Court, Is Combative and Feisty
Who Should Bush nominate for Supreme Court?